After all, he predicted the internet would collapse under its own weight a couple of years ago. I notice that once again he's predicting its imminent failure.
The fact is, the situation is a simple "Linux vs. Windows, winner take all." Both are going to survive and prosper.
Also, I take issue with his statement that Linux is based on 60's technology and therefore bad. I would use the word "proven". I'd certainly rather be using 60's based Linux than, say, 70's based DOS, 80's based MacOS, or 90's based Win95.
Slashdot Mirror
What I meant, of course, was:
The fact is, the situation is *NOT* a simple "Linux vs. Windows, winner take all." Both are going to survive and prosper.
After all, he predicted the internet would collapse under its own weight a couple of years ago. I notice that once again he's predicting its imminent failure.
The fact is, the situation is a simple "Linux vs. Windows, winner take all." Both are going to survive and prosper.
Also, I take issue with his statement that Linux is based on 60's technology and therefore bad. I would use the word "proven". I'd certainly rather be using 60's based Linux than, say, 70's based DOS, 80's based MacOS, or 90's based Win95.