Show me. Because, on this very thread, I (actually it wasn't provided for me so much as to wankers and liars like you) was provided with proof on this very thread that the projections are doing fairly well. The least *you* can do is at least try to show some proof and not just repeat a lie over and over and over and over again.
Yup, I'm constantly amazed what kind of BS levels people can accept when it fits their preconceptions and how anything that doesn't, no matter how you put it, just must be wrong.
I agree that most likely we can't get our shit together and do enough in time, so here's something I want you to remember 30-50 years later when the changes will be more noticeable - you don't have to agree with me, just remember these words: "You were with the fucktards who prevented the rest of us from preventing what's happening, are you happy now!?"
And it don't matter what you reply (or preferably don't) - you *will* remember when the shit hits the fan.
I would think that the fact that the climate would warm up slowly and eventually would effect us even if we had done nothing to cause it is NOT a good reason to keep making it happen in close future. I would say that it is very irresponsible, short sighted, stupid and all together a very much wanker thing to do.
Your like my dads brother. Said that he wont stop smoking, because medical science is advancing so fast that if he ever got lung cancer in future, surely they would know how to cure him by then. Didn't quite work out for him, but I'm sure he was basically on the right track;)
Boy, what an attitude... Foreign aid packages? Yeah, we don't get those here in Europe, but I guess you didn't really go to school so how would you know?
People like you is why the rest of the western world so often think that USA is a country full of douchebags. And it's pretty much the other way around. PLEASE, do stop meddling with our business - but you have a lot of nerve to say that you are the ones getting screwed by us. Take your bend-over-and-take-it-in trade pacts and shove 'em.
You know, the ozone layer threat was (and still is, although it's slowly recovering) a real thing, and only because we eventually got every single country to agree and ban certain chemicals, it was slowed down and finally started to recover (giving the clueless know-it-all's a chance to claim the threat was a hoax; sometimes I wonder if we should have just let it continue and not having to hear this BS now, although not seriously).
"In 1976 atmospheric research revealed that the ozone layer was being depleted by chemicals released by industry, mainly chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Concerns that increased UV radiation due to ozone depletion threatened life on Earth, including increased skin cancer in humans and other ecological problems[4], led to bans on the chemicals, and the latest evidence is that ozone depletion has slowed or stopped."
Today, not even most climate sceptics wouldn't claim that the "scare" was unfounded, false or hoax... But then there are total nutcases, like you apparently, who prefer to not actually read anything outside of their prejudices.
It's because he gets these claims and numbers only from climate change sceptics articles. I love it when they get faced by the actual facts, but I have very little confidence that their opinions are swayed by pesky little inconveniences, such as facts.
In the end it comes to them not wanting to even have to consider any alternative, as it would be too scary. And THAT is VERY scary for the rest of us, especially as there are political leaders that think like them.
The thing with you climate sceptics is that if there's even one false prediction or one badly done study then for the next n+1 years that is ALL you can talk about. And it doesn't even matter if your argument is debunked, you guys will still keep repeating it.
And that's how your kind has lost any and all credibility in my eyes.
If you're claiming that smallpox inoculation didn't work, and all that history is just a hoax, then you're delusional - and no arguments win over delusions. Don't bother replying if you haven't read that wikipedia link above - I mean it; read it first or shut up.
Slashdot Mirror
So untasteful... Man, not so long ago this was just a joke in the simpsons....
Yuck. Good point.
Maybe, just maybe, it has something to do with the gigantic amounts of crap you've put in atmosphere?
I have read, and you are an idiot who doesn't know weather from climate.
Let me quess: Trump said it's so.
I see, you're stupid.
Show me. Because, on this very thread, I (actually it wasn't provided for me so much as to wankers and liars like you) was provided with proof on this very thread that the projections are doing fairly well. The least *you* can do is at least try to show some proof and not just repeat a lie over and over and over and over again.
Well put :)
I don't know where you get your evidence, but it's wrong. What you say? Oh, from your hat? That figures.
You people make me wish there was a hell.
Yup, I'm constantly amazed what kind of BS levels people can accept when it fits their preconceptions and how anything that doesn't, no matter how you put it, just must be wrong.
I agree that most likely we can't get our shit together and do enough in time, so here's something I want you to remember 30-50 years later when the changes will be more noticeable - you don't have to agree with me, just remember these words:
"You were with the fucktards who prevented the rest of us from preventing what's happening, are you happy now!?"
And it don't matter what you reply (or preferably don't) - you *will* remember when the shit hits the fan.
Erratic rambling vs. scientific research... How to choose, how to choose...
I would think that the fact that the climate would warm up slowly and eventually would effect us even if we had done nothing to cause it is NOT a good reason to keep making it happen in close future. I would say that it is very irresponsible, short sighted, stupid and all together a very much wanker thing to do.
Fucking Americans, won't get an education, just a waistline.
ROTFLMAO, god I wish I had mod points :D
Your like my dads brother. Said that he wont stop smoking, because medical science is advancing so fast that if he ever got lung cancer in future, surely they would know how to cure him by then. Didn't quite work out for him, but I'm sure he was basically on the right track ;)
Boy, what an attitude... Foreign aid packages? Yeah, we don't get those here in Europe, but I guess you didn't really go to school so how would you know?
People like you is why the rest of the western world so often think that USA is a country full of douchebags. And it's pretty much the other way around. PLEASE, do stop meddling with our business - but you have a lot of nerve to say that you are the ones getting screwed by us. Take your bend-over-and-take-it-in trade pacts and shove 'em.
Care to share this dark agenda that apparently every proper climate scientist seems to have, according to you that is?
Your claims about you listening to real scientists could be funny, that is if they weren't not funny at all.
...although, you're claims about UN still don't stand the fact check either.
People in the UN are political leaders, not scientists. I'm assuming he/she meant the people who actually know and understand this stuff.
You know, the ozone layer threat was (and still is, although it's slowly recovering) a real thing, and only because we eventually got every single country to agree and ban certain chemicals, it was slowed down and finally started to recover (giving the clueless know-it-all's a chance to claim the threat was a hoax; sometimes I wonder if we should have just let it continue and not having to hear this BS now, although not seriously).
"In 1976 atmospheric research revealed that the ozone layer was being depleted by chemicals released by industry, mainly chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Concerns that increased UV radiation due to ozone depletion threatened life on Earth, including increased skin cancer in humans and other ecological problems[4], led to bans on the chemicals, and the latest evidence is that ozone depletion has slowed or stopped."
Today, not even most climate sceptics wouldn't claim that the "scare" was unfounded, false or hoax... But then there are total nutcases, like you apparently, who prefer to not actually read anything outside of their prejudices.
Read a bit for a change:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_layer#Depletion
*incompehesible muttering and rambling*...socialist shithole...*more of the same*
What you claim he/she to have said and what he/she actually wrote seem to be two very different things.
It's because he gets these claims and numbers only from climate change sceptics articles. I love it when they get faced by the actual facts, but I have very little confidence that their opinions are swayed by pesky little inconveniences, such as facts.
In the end it comes to them not wanting to even have to consider any alternative, as it would be too scary. And THAT is VERY scary for the rest of us, especially as there are political leaders that think like them.
The thing with you climate sceptics is that if there's even one false prediction or one badly done study then for the next n+1 years that is ALL you can talk about. And it doesn't even matter if your argument is debunked, you guys will still keep repeating it.
And that's how your kind has lost any and all credibility in my eyes.
If you're claiming that smallpox inoculation didn't work, and all that history is just a hoax, then you're delusional - and no arguments win over delusions. Don't bother replying if you haven't read that wikipedia link above - I mean it; read it first or shut up.