"A democracy is always temporary in nature"
"it simply cannot exist as a permanent..."
"A democracy will continue to exist up until..."
"...with the result that every democracy will finally collapse..."
How much more explicitly predictive do you need it phrased? This is not just descriptive but predictive. He's formulating it as a law.
'Great' is a hopelessly imprecise word, and you can't 'disprove' a sloppily-defined concept any more than you can 'disprove', without further clarification of terms, the existence of 'God'.
You can certainly argue against it, but you can't disprove it. It's a bullshit concept. Without clarification of such fuzzy terms like 'greatest', 'spiritual faith', 'bondage' etc., and without any specification of over what time scale this supposed phenomenon operates, you can make almost anything fit into or not fit into the schema.
Slashdot Mirror
Google is a wonderful thing.
So is a sense of humor :)
WAT??? what the fuck is reverse cowboy??? slamming your ass against hers when she's bent over? you're opening up whole new worlds for me.
"it is not claiming to be a law"
"A democracy is always temporary in nature"
"it simply cannot exist as a permanent..."
"A democracy will continue to exist up until..."
"...with the result that every democracy will finally collapse..."
How much more explicitly predictive do you need it phrased? This is not just descriptive but predictive. He's formulating it as a law. 'Great' is a hopelessly imprecise word, and you can't 'disprove' a sloppily-defined concept any more than you can 'disprove', without further clarification of terms, the existence of 'God'. You can certainly argue against it, but you can't disprove it. It's a bullshit concept. Without clarification of such fuzzy terms like 'greatest', 'spiritual faith', 'bondage' etc., and without any specification of over what time scale this supposed phenomenon operates, you can make almost anything fit into or not fit into the schema.