While renewable energy technology is the answer, nuclear energy is an excellent interim solution.
Anyone whose concerned about safety, I want you to go and look up how many nuclear reactors are over 30, 40 years old. These antique behemoths are being run because there are many unnecessary obstacles to overcome if you want to build a new plant.
Nuclear technology as well as construction and information systems have improved dramatically each decade, so how is it that people can react to modern reactors as if they have no safety advantages over their retro-ancestors?
Or they feel so secure in their position that they're comfortable dropping the pretext that what they do is anything other than a huge scam.
"We can reduce the size of the haystack when we are looking for that one-in-a-billion terrorist," said TSA Administrator John Pistole."
That would mean that the TSA believes there's approximately six or seven terrorists in the world, so why is all of this necessary again?
I see several ex editors here talking about the abuses they suffered that caused them to leave Wikipedia, but at no point do they talk about making any attempt to stop the abuse. If you take a little time to document your actions and pay attention to Wikipedia's natural documentation, you can take these abuses to a higher authority and get some action taken. How can you complain about the problems with the system if you simply bent to the whims of the abusers?
couldn't help imagining what it would be like for one of the ants that had it's legs cut off, was made to walk home across the desert on it's stumps and then was totally bewildered as to where it's home had gone.
I know they're just ants, but damn that's sad.
Slashdot Mirror
While renewable energy technology is the answer, nuclear energy is an excellent interim solution.
Anyone whose concerned about safety, I want you to go and look up how many nuclear reactors are over 30, 40 years old. These antique behemoths are being run because there are many unnecessary obstacles to overcome if you want to build a new plant. Nuclear technology as well as construction and information systems have improved dramatically each decade, so how is it that people can react to modern reactors as if they have no safety advantages over their retro-ancestors?
Or they feel so secure in their position that they're comfortable dropping the pretext that what they do is anything other than a huge scam. "We can reduce the size of the haystack when we are looking for that one-in-a-billion terrorist," said TSA Administrator John Pistole." That would mean that the TSA believes there's approximately six or seven terrorists in the world, so why is all of this necessary again?
I see several ex editors here talking about the abuses they suffered that caused them to leave Wikipedia, but at no point do they talk about making any attempt to stop the abuse. If you take a little time to document your actions and pay attention to Wikipedia's natural documentation, you can take these abuses to a higher authority and get some action taken. How can you complain about the problems with the system if you simply bent to the whims of the abusers?
couldn't help imagining what it would be like for one of the ants that had it's legs cut off, was made to walk home across the desert on it's stumps and then was totally bewildered as to where it's home had gone. I know they're just ants, but damn that's sad.