At least at the university I work for, having a CS degree, or being in the CS program, is no indication of having proper systems administration skills. Perhaps there should also be an SA degree. I don't write algorithms or programs; I manage systems for security, performance and availability.
"Stanford" is not a monolithic computing environment; there is the central IT group, each school and department has their own computer systems, and students in dorms and with laptops deal with their own systems.
I'm a sysadmin for ITSS (the central IT group), and to my knowledge, none of our Solaris or Linux boxes have been compromised. (Nor have our Windows servers.) That said, ensuring that patches have been applied to all machines across campus has been a huge problem (and generally, a much bigger problem for Windows systems.)
Well, I'm an AIX systems adminstrator; I've spent zero time worrying about this, but I have wasted a good amount of my employer's time reading stories from Slashdot and other sources. Can we get money from SCO for that time?
openssh works fine under cygwin. that is what we use.
Re:And they could only kill women as well!
on
Do You Have The Time?
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
That song was written and performed by Joe Jackson; Anthrax covered it.
Re:It all depends on your reason ...
on
Penguin2Apple
·
· Score: 1
\Zeal"ot\, n. [F. z['e]lote, L. zelotes, Gr. ?. See Zeal.] One who is zealous; one who engages warmly in any cause, and pursues his object with earnestness and ardor; especially, one who is overzealous, or carried away by his zeal; one absorbed in devotion to anything; an enthusiast; a fanatical partisan.
I think my use of the word zealot describes the type of person that I was referring to perfectly.
A woman who opposes abortion and goes to see a doctor who opposes abortion is not a zealot. A woman who doesn't go to the only doctor who can save her life because the doctor believes in choice is a zealot.
A linux user who chooses to use linux because it does the job that person needs it to do, and who agrees with the linux philosophy is not a zealot. A Linux user who uses Linux only because of the "live free or die" philosophy is a zealot.
Have we strayed far enough off-topic yet?
Re:It all depends on your reason ...
on
Penguin2Apple
·
· Score: 1
I meant that if one is using Linux over other, possibly more appropriate, operating systems, simply because of ideology, then that person is a zealot.
If there are multiple "good choices", then I suppose that your view of the "moral edge" that Linux has is as good as any other arbitrary deciding factor.
It all depends on your reason ...
on
Penguin2Apple
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
... for using Linux. If you are using Linux because of an irrational devotion to the "open source - free speech and free beer" ideology, then moving to Mac OS X would be a violation of your principles.
If you are using Linux because you have evaluated the alternatives, and it provides the best bang/buck ratio for the application(s) that you are using or deploying, then using Mac OS X would also be wrong.
But if your goal is to have the power and flexibility of a Unix-like operating system and the device support, smooth, consistent GUI, and application support of a commercial mass-market operating system, then it would be illogical to just discount Mac OS X as a viable option.
Re:you can print over the network if you ...
on
Apple Licenses CUPS
·
· Score: 1
um, no, you can modify the script in the hint, setting up the output filter to do whatever you want with the input, create whatever kind of output you want.
What does your statement about being limited to postscript mean, relative to the my post, and the article I referenced?
you can print over the network if you ...
on
Apple Licenses CUPS
·
· Score: 4, Informative
I know its not open-source, but we use DocuShare, a Xerox product, for document management. It's not designed for "code management", it's designed for document management. Check it out (I don't have a URL handy, but it shouldn't be hard to find.)
one of your suggested commands (almost) works... Mac OS X PB contains an "open" command, which can be used to launch an GUI application from the command-line.
open/path/to/app/or/document
will open the application specified, or the document specified with the default app for its type.
Now if apple could create an "AppleScript Shell" (assh?) then we could type...
$ tell application movieplayer to open porno movie
Have you used AOL's software lately? U-G-L-Y. They can't decide if they are designing for low end computers with itsy-bitsy monitors or for people using 21-inch monitors @ super-high resolution and millions of colors.
So they go for both. I don't have much hope for Mozilla at this point (at least, on the Mac.)
1 The doctrine or hypothesis of Erasmus Darwin. Obs. (nonce-use.)
1856 B. W. Richardson Life T. Sopwith (1891) 256 Mr. Sopwith described the hypothesis of the development of living things from a primordial centre. That, said Reade, is rank Darwinism. It was the first time I had heard that word used..it had reference to Erasmus Darwin.
2 The biological theory of Charles Darwin concerning the evolution of species, etc., set forth especially in his works entitled `The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life' (1859), and `The Descent of Man and Selection in relation to Sex' (1871).
1864 T. H. Huxley in Nat. Hist. Rev. Oct. 567 What we may term the philosophical position of Darwinism.1871 Athenæum 15 July 84 It is impossible to reconcile the Doctors of the Church with the Doctors of Darwinism. 1876 Ray Lankester tr. Haeckel's Hist. Creation I. 1 The scientific theory..commonly called..Darwinism, is only a small fragment of a far more comprehensive doctrine. 1889 A. R. Wallace (title), Darwinism, An exposition of the theory of Natural Selection with some of its applications.
So 'Darwinist, a follower of Darwin, a Darwinian. Darwi'nistic a., of or pertaining to Darwinism. 'Darwinize v., to speculate or theorize after the manner of (Erasmus or Charles) Darwin; also trans.; so 'Darwinized ppl. a.
1883 Sci. & Lit. Gossip I. 79 Interesting to every sincere Darwinist. 1875 tr. Schmidt's Desc. & Darw. 292 Decisive in favour of Darwinistic views. 1882 Athenæum 27 May 663/2 In connexion with Darwinistic explanations of ends. 1880 Nature XXI. 246 Coleridge invented the term `Darwinising' to express his contempt for the speculations of the elder Darwin. 1886 Contemp. Rev. Sept. 435 Darwinizing sociologists. 1920 G. B. Shaw in Public Opinion 13 Aug. 160/2 It has restored faith in Providence to a Darwinised world. 1929 Blunden Nature in Eng. Lit. 14 The great mind which compares and sifts evidence until a new De Rerum Natura darwinizes us.
At least at the university I work for, having a CS degree, or being in the CS program, is no indication of having proper systems administration skills. Perhaps there should also be an SA degree. I don't write algorithms or programs; I manage systems for security, performance and availability.
"Stanford" is not a monolithic computing environment; there is the central IT group, each school and department has their own computer systems, and students in dorms and with laptops deal with their own systems.
I'm a sysadmin for ITSS (the central IT group), and to my knowledge, none of our Solaris or Linux boxes have been compromised. (Nor have our Windows servers.) That said, ensuring that patches have been applied to all machines across campus has been a huge problem (and generally, a much bigger problem for Windows systems.)
Well, I'm an AIX systems adminstrator; I've spent zero time worrying about this, but I have wasted a good amount of my employer's time reading stories from Slashdot and other sources. Can we get money from SCO for that time?
Connectix did not buy out the product. Connectix developed their own, superior product, and then sold it at a fraction of the cost of SoftWindows.
Gee, take out the word "Linux" and it sounds suspiciously like Mac OS X.
openssh works fine under cygwin. that is what we use.
That song was written and performed by Joe Jackson; Anthrax covered it.
\Zeal"ot\, n. [F. z['e]lote, L. zelotes, Gr. ?. See Zeal.] One who is zealous; one who engages warmly in any cause, and pursues his object with earnestness and ardor; especially, one who is overzealous, or carried away by his zeal; one absorbed in devotion to anything; an enthusiast; a fanatical partisan.
I think my use of the word zealot describes the type of person that I was referring to perfectly.
A woman who opposes abortion and goes to see a doctor who opposes abortion is not a zealot. A woman who doesn't go to the only doctor who can save her life because the doctor believes in choice is a zealot.
A linux user who chooses to use linux because it does the job that person needs it to do, and who agrees with the linux philosophy is not a zealot. A Linux user who uses Linux only because of the "live free or die" philosophy is a zealot.
Have we strayed far enough off-topic yet?
I meant that if one is using Linux over other, possibly more appropriate, operating systems, simply because of ideology, then that person is a zealot.
If there are multiple "good choices", then I suppose that your view of the "moral edge" that Linux has is as good as any other arbitrary deciding factor.
... for using Linux. If you are using Linux because of an irrational devotion to the "open source - free speech and free beer" ideology, then moving to Mac OS X would be a violation of your principles.
If you are using Linux because you have evaluated the alternatives, and it provides the best bang/buck ratio for the application(s) that you are using or deploying, then using Mac OS X would also be wrong.
But if your goal is to have the power and flexibility of a Unix-like operating system and the device support, smooth, consistent GUI, and application support of a commercial mass-market operating system, then it would be illogical to just discount Mac OS X as a viable option.
um, no, you can modify the script in the hint, setting up the output filter to do whatever you want with the input, create whatever kind of output you want.
What does your statement about being limited to postscript mean, relative to the my post, and the article I referenced?
just do the steps listed in the hint at Mac OS X Hints.
I know its not open-source, but we use DocuShare, a Xerox product, for document management. It's not designed for "code management", it's designed for document management. Check it out (I don't have a URL handy, but it shouldn't be hard to find.)
wow! someone who categorizes ripping mp3s as real work! any openings at your company?
one of your suggested commands (almost) works
open
will open the application specified, or the document specified with the default app for its type.
Now if apple could create an "AppleScript Shell" (assh?) then we could type
$ tell application movieplayer to open porno movie
and so on
It's called Tripwire "Academic Source Release", and is at version 1.3.1. http://www.tripwire.com/downloads/
Have you used AOL's software lately? U-G-L-Y. They can't decide if they are designing for low end computers with itsy-bitsy monitors or for people using 21-inch monitors @ super-high resolution and millions of colors.
So they go for both. I don't have much hope for Mozilla at this point (at least, on the Mac.)
OED Entries Matched
1 entry found.
1. Darwinism ('dA:rwInIz(@)m). [-ism.]
1 The doctrine or hypothesis of Erasmus Darwin. Obs. (nonce-use.)
1856 B. W. Richardson Life T. Sopwith (1891) 256 Mr. Sopwith described the hypothesis of the development of living things from a primordial centre. That, said Reade, is rank Darwinism. It was the first time I had heard that word used..it had reference to Erasmus Darwin.
2 The biological theory of Charles Darwin concerning the evolution of species, etc., set forth especially in his works entitled `The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life' (1859), and `The Descent of Man and Selection in relation to Sex' (1871).
1864 T. H. Huxley in Nat. Hist. Rev. Oct. 567 What we may term the philosophical position of Darwinism.1871 Athenæum 15 July 84 It is impossible to reconcile the Doctors of the Church with the Doctors of Darwinism. 1876 Ray Lankester tr. Haeckel's Hist. Creation I. 1 The scientific theory..commonly called..Darwinism, is only a small fragment of a far more comprehensive doctrine. 1889 A. R. Wallace (title), Darwinism, An exposition of the theory of Natural Selection with some of its applications.
So 'Darwinist, a follower of Darwin, a Darwinian. Darwi'nistic a., of or pertaining to Darwinism. 'Darwinize v., to speculate or theorize after the manner of (Erasmus or Charles) Darwin; also trans.; so 'Darwinized ppl. a.
1883 Sci. & Lit. Gossip I. 79 Interesting to every sincere Darwinist. 1875 tr. Schmidt's Desc. & Darw. 292 Decisive in favour of Darwinistic views. 1882 Athenæum 27 May 663/2 In connexion with Darwinistic explanations of ends. 1880 Nature XXI. 246 Coleridge invented the term `Darwinising' to express his contempt for the speculations of the elder Darwin. 1886 Contemp. Rev. Sept. 435 Darwinizing sociologists. 1920 G. B. Shaw in Public Opinion 13 Aug. 160/2 It has restored faith in Providence to a Darwinised world. 1929 Blunden Nature in Eng. Lit. 14 The great mind which compares and sifts evidence until a new De Rerum Natura darwinizes us.
from netcraft ... www.salon.com is running Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) mod_perl/1.23 mod_oas/4.65 on Linux.