It's my understanding that a lot of the injuries were fingers or ears that had been cut off. Not generally something you go for if your intent is to kill.
So you were probably about the same age at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union as the Marxist turd you're responding to is now. What's it like watching your home country go through the same motions?
the same rule applies to guns..which is likely to miss out of 10 times
No, it doesn't really apply at all. With a gun you have multiple chances to hit a target, and you also have multiple chances to hit multiple target. The same rules do not apply as with something where you have one chance to hit one target.
And by "creative process," do you mean "asking you again how it's coming along, even though I know you'll let me know when it's finished, just before requesting more features when you've only made it through half the ones I requested at our last meeting on top of a few sent by e-mail?"
"Protected environment?" That's quite possibly the least protected environment on earth. That's why he chose it.
There is no number. The 9/11 attacks didn't kill enough people for me to support draconian "alterations" to the Fourth Amendment. So, evidently, 3,000+ people, including children isn't enough at one time for me to want to start throwing away fundamental rights over something so rare.
Is there any sacrifice of liberty you can't be sufficiently scared into supporting?
I don't know how high the number would have to be for me to start emitting shrill cries of "Save us, federal government! Overturn the rights of millions of law-abiding Americans now!"
But it's a hell of a lot higher than 26.
Slashdot Mirror
Depends on whether it makes it to SCOTUS before or after any BHO appointees get in.
Don't know about Guatemala or Colombia, but private firearm ownership is more or less illegal in Mexico.
There's a method for changing it. And it's not "one state decides that it doesn't apply in their borders."
Except you now can't acquire most of them. And you can't sell the ones you have. And you have to sell the magazines you already have.
It's my understanding that a lot of the injuries were fingers or ears that had been cut off. Not generally something you go for if your intent is to kill.
So you were probably about the same age at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union as the Marxist turd you're responding to is now. What's it like watching your home country go through the same motions?
the same rule applies to guns..which is likely to miss out of 10 times
No, it doesn't really apply at all. With a gun you have multiple chances to hit a target, and you also have multiple chances to hit multiple target. The same rules do not apply as with something where you have one chance to hit one target.
Ever heard of an SKS?
10 seconds? If it takes you 2, you're fucking something up.
Which are great as long as there's only one attacker and you don't miss.
Until they see a good opportunity to ban them.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/remove-united-states-district-attorney-carmen-ortiz-office-overreach-case-aaron-swartz/RQNrG1Ck There's also this.
If you have to use a crowbar in the course of trespassing, that usually turns it into breaking and entering.
"Creative process" my ass.
OPSEC
I think I'll continue paying my $30 a month for cable. I'm fine with that.
I had to google this to see if you were telling the truth. Poe's law and all.
American protesters want to much money.
Don't forget smashing windows.
Ever met a pregnant teenager? I have; They tend to be a bit... emotionally unstable.
And easy lays.
woosh
As I've said before, there is no number. Being dramatic isn't going to change that, either.
"Protected environment?" That's quite possibly the least protected environment on earth. That's why he chose it.
There is no number. The 9/11 attacks didn't kill enough people for me to support draconian "alterations" to the Fourth Amendment. So, evidently, 3,000+ people, including children isn't enough at one time for me to want to start throwing away fundamental rights over something so rare.
Is there any sacrifice of liberty you can't be sufficiently scared into supporting?
But any effort spent defending the practicality or utility of a P220 under the pillow is utterly wasted.
Under the pillow would be a horrible place for it.
You also seem to be implying that people aren't mentally capable of using firearms safely and/or defensively. That is absurd.
I don't know how high the number would have to be for me to start emitting shrill cries of "Save us, federal government! Overturn the rights of millions of law-abiding Americans now!" But it's a hell of a lot higher than 26.