If that makes sense then as Congresswoman Gwen Moore says it makes a lot more sense to start at the top with the richest because you will get a much better return.
And after that you can work your way down from the richest, though it's not cost effective to go all the way to the poor.
"What could I possibly do to change the decisions others make?"
Answers can be found in normal human relations, psychologists and educational therapists could provide some help along those lines. Like if you insult someone they will be more likely to retaliate, so at that level for example you could change your behavior and that would help others make different decisions.
In this case, you can look at it at the level of cultural relations.
"the answer us kill those whose made up mind does not match the decision that you would have chosen. If you can't change a person's mind, destroying it achieve the same outcome"
The question was "What could I possibly do to change the decisions others make?"
"Asians were 'oppressed' much more than black people were in the recent past, just ask George Takei (Mr. Sulu)."
Pick any group, oppress them and you will have more of them in prison and more violence among.
"Black people haven't been oppressed for give-or-take 50 years"
so you say so
"that's several generations of black people growing up without knowing what it was like to be segregated"
or working as slaves, so?
"Still, historically, black crime wasn't nearly disproportionate as it is today even though they were 'oppressed'. In the early 1900's-1950's race of incarcerated people largely resembled the actual population ratios although it was higher for those of 'negro' decent (that was the word used in context to statistical data), there were many times more white people in prison than any other race"
Pick any group, oppress them and you will have more of them in (the oppressors) prison and (probably) more violence among
That's part of the definition. Though I'd question the 'more violence' part
"The best option now is to spread that loss all around"
In Canada, politicians (national, provincial, and municipal) have been saying they'll be more transparent for years but so far they've actually made it harder to access information.
Its not about stupid. How many people even now something like this could happen, I know it could happen, but I'm talking the average intelligent person, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot less than half of those have ever heard something like this could happen.
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed
"Value is set on the market. Including the value of labor and capital."
That simply means that those currently with the most 'value' in the current system have invested in the system that lets 'the market' set 'value'.
If that makes sense then as Congresswoman Gwen Moore says it makes a lot more sense to start at the top with the richest because you will get a much better return.
And after that you can work your way down from the richest, though it's not cost effective to go all the way to the poor.
"You don't know what the word rhapsody means?"
Do you think that he doesn't?
"Are you 10 years old or have you just been living in a cave your entire life?"
And you?
"Neither Picard nor Bill.G have a product featuring a touchscreen"
Is that only because it was too expensive at the time to include in a consumer device
"Once you give the government control over who gets a firearm, eventually only government agents get them"
Why believe that when evidence proves the opposite
Of course, but it is relevant to cause
You aren't using the same definition of the word nuts so your point is not relevant
I disagree now with what I wrote, please delete
"What could I possibly do to change the decisions others make?"
Answers can be found in normal human relations, psychologists and educational therapists could provide some help along those lines. Like if you insult someone they will be more likely to retaliate, so at that level for example you could change your behavior and that would help others make different decisions.
In this case, you can look at it at the level of cultural relations.
"the answer us kill those whose made up mind does not match the decision that you would have chosen. If you can't change a person's mind, destroying it achieve the same outcome"
The question was "What could I possibly do to change the decisions others make?"
"Asians were 'oppressed' much more than black people were in the recent past, just ask George Takei (Mr. Sulu)."
Pick any group, oppress them and you will have more of them in prison and more violence among.
"Black people haven't been oppressed for give-or-take 50 years"
so you say so
"that's several generations of black people growing up without knowing what it was like to be segregated"
or working as slaves, so?
"Still, historically, black crime wasn't nearly disproportionate as it is today even though they were 'oppressed'. In the early 1900's-1950's race of incarcerated people largely resembled the actual population ratios although it was higher for those of 'negro' decent (that was the word used in context to statistical data), there were many times more white people in prison than any other race"
Pick any group, oppress them and you will have more of them in (the oppressors) prison and (probably) more violence among
That's part of the definition. Though I'd question the 'more violence' part
Good point, but it doesn't answer your question
Hey! what happened to my sarcasm quotes!
None of that contradicts what I said
it's possible that groups of black teenagers commit more crimes and get arrested more often than groups of white teenagers"
That's what you'd expect in a racist society.
Most cultural hierarchies of authority produce down-right horrible human beings
That's really interesting.
"I want my country back, I really do"
Go back to where you came from, then
That's your assignment, answer your own question.
Pick any group, oppress them and you will have more of them in prison and more violence among.
"The best option now is to spread that loss all around"
In Canada, politicians (national, provincial, and municipal) have been saying they'll be more transparent for years but so far they've actually made it harder to access information.
Its not about stupid. How many people even now something like this could happen, I know it could happen, but I'm talking the average intelligent person, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot less than half of those have ever heard something like this could happen.
"If "excessive users" are interfering with anybody else, causing that interference was an explicit choice by the ISP."
Exactly
"serious bandwidth abusers"
LOL, witch hunts