Better yet, see if you can get hold of one of CM's "happy hacker documents" You will laugh then shake your head as she tries to explain DNS, TCP/IP etc...Its full of incorrect statements and off-the wall ideas. Very sad that alot of people actually take her writings as truth. I like the part where she is probing a machine and attempts to hide the domain by hashing it out with XXX's but then 1 page later hashes out the other half fully revealing the hostname and OS version..
This is all so sad, I wish people respected life more in the US. When I was younger (Im only 24) the thought of killing someone was out of the question. We would rather Crazy glue your locker closed, than shoot you in the face. This is in Brooklyn, NY mind you. It seems most teens have very little respect for each other and people in general. I can not begin to understand how this type of attitude came about.
You guys realize you might as well give the IP address with that much information. hashing out digits on the host part of your IP only leaves 256 possible IPS.
28$ a month 5 ips(not static, they change about every 3-4 months if you reboot or they reboot the DHCP server.) 5 email addresses 3mb down 768k up. Works for me. We have server restrictions, if you use too much bandwidth they will get pissed.
RoadRunner is a great cable modem carrier, (time Warner) The staff is knowledgable and I seldom have problems with it. I wish I had a faster PC to handle the speed.
Its faster to install linux over the network than it is off of my 2x cdrom.(yeah I know)
10.39.69.11 Internal address? or old harvard addresses?
traceroute to 10.39.69.11 (10.39.69.11), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 tas6-qe5.maine.rr.com (24.93.145.1) 15.646 ms * 4.139 ms 2 pwmcore02-atm.maine.rr.com (204.210.64.253) 7.489 ms 4.991 ms 6.867 ms 3 prbrt01-prrtr01.rr.com (24.218.188.30) 4.968 ms 5.293 ms 22.279 ms 4 bsgsr01-prbrt01.rr.com (24.218.188.26) 7.370 ms 454.815 ms 10.713 ms 5 nygsr01-bsgsr01.rr.com (24.218.188.22) 16.945 ms 16.229 ms 14.833 ms 6 nybrt01-nygsr01.rr.com (24.218.188.5) 15.206 ms 14.960 ms 14.838 ms 7 pnbrt01-nybrt01.rr.com (24.218.188.9) 18.492 ms 18.602 ms 16.900 ms 8 sprint-nap.ibm.net (192.157.69.20) 99.654 ms 19.667 ms 23.998 ms 9 nyor1sr1-5-0.ny.us.ibm.net (198.133.27.6) 22.759 ms 47.171 ms 30.571 ms 10 nyc-br4-s4-p0.ny.us.prserv.net (165.87.140.5) 95.478 ms 107.131 ms 100.180 ms 11 port1br1-10-1-0.pt.uk.ibm.net (152.158.23.25) 101.303 ms 207.499 ms 105.553 ms 12 zuri1br1.zu.ch.ibm.net (152.158.50.1) 143.565 ms 135.260 ms 137.907 ms 13 152.158.98.1 (152.158.98.1) 137.839 ms 144.676 ms 141.434 ms 14 152.158.50.253 (152.158.50.253) 340.122 ms 333.118 ms 275.063 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * zuri1br1-1-2-1.zu.ch.ibm.net (152.158.50.254) 469.613 ms !X *
This article is about geek culture and the fact that in the shadow of a disaster a geeks still love technology, computers and the internet. This is not about a morbid death fetish. Get of your soap box and quit crying. No one is twisting these peoples arms to live where they live. I dont feel bad at all for the dummy who gets crushed because he is stitting in his beach cottage filming the storm surge. Slashdot is looking at this from a geeks perspective if you dont understand that then go read www.cnn.com like the rest of the masses.
I know what I will be reading tonight. I needed to do some reasearch on a paper I am writing on information gathering, and here is a more advanced article right in phrack.
Macs are great, I wish I could afford one. I think a mac would make a great server. They seem stable enough, you could even but a *nix on for command line functionality. Doesnt the BSD's also support the mac family of processors?
I think we should beat on that LinuxPPC box. I think they should open up DoS attacks also just to prove a point. They should open sendmail and ftp ports also. I mean they have posted the root password on the website already. That is pretty confident if you ask me.
mail w2000its@microsoft.com with bo2k attached. Maybe the backwards compatible stuff will bite them in the arse. =)
Re:Nice tactic to get Linux into enterprise market
on
Yellow Dog for RS/6000
·
· Score: 1
Heh, you would like to think that nuclear power plants update hardware / software. The one I consulted for had a P100 running BSDI/2.1 for a mail server.
This would be great, another Desktop OS. If I were them I would keep it as different from BeOS System X and windows as possible. Maybe create a 3D desktop as the standard? that would be neato.
I agree that UNIX distros need work to secure them out of the box, the problem is microsoft has no security model for 98/95. NT can be made much more secure with some work; however, I wont allow our firewall to be built on one for a few reasons.
1) Patches releases take to long 2) Stability 3) The UNIX os's have been around for 30 years and poked at longer. 4) Go ahead install that service pack on your critical NT system I dare you. 5) automation.
I love linux for the fact that I can make a 386/dx 20 a firewall with an http proxy server. I use a 486DX50 at home for my webserver. Pretty snappy with only 28M of ram. I am upgrading to a 486DX 66 and 32M of ram next week. Should be interesting.
Slashdot Mirror
Look how dumb this is:
(this link is referenced by a broken pi icon from
the main page)
http://www.happyhacker.org/pi.htm
Uh, connection attempts are like logged by syslogd, you dont need to trick someone in to thinking you logged it, you really did CM!
Better yet, see if you can get hold of one of CM's "happy hacker documents" You will laugh then shake your head as she tries to explain DNS, TCP/IP etc...Its full of incorrect statements and off-the wall ideas. Very sad that alot of people actually take her writings as truth. I like the part where she is probing a machine and attempts to hide the domain by hashing it out with XXX's but then 1 page later hashes out the other half fully revealing the hostname and OS version..
funny.
This is all so sad, I wish people respected life more in the US. When I was younger (Im only 24)
the thought of killing someone was out of the question. We would rather Crazy glue your locker closed, than shoot you in the face. This is in Brooklyn, NY mind you. It seems most teens have very little respect for each other and people in general. I can not begin to understand how this type of attitude came about.
Any ideas from the younger slashdot crowd?
Packet sniffing is only possible if your seeing all the traffic pass over your cable modem. This doesnt happen.
You guys realize you might as well give the IP address with that much information. hashing out digits on the host part of your IP only leaves 256 possible IPS.
28$ a month 5 ips(not static, they change about every 3-4 months if you reboot or they reboot the DHCP server.) 5 email addresses 3mb down 768k up. Works for me. We have server restrictions, if you use too much bandwidth they will get pissed.
RoadRunner is a great cable modem carrier, (time Warner) The staff is knowledgable and I seldom have problems with it. I wish I had a faster PC to handle the speed.
Its faster to install linux over the network than it is off of my 2x cdrom.(yeah I know)
10.39.69.11 Internal address? or old harvard addresses?
traceroute to 10.39.69.11 (10.39.69.11), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 tas6-qe5.maine.rr.com (24.93.145.1) 15.646 ms * 4.139 ms
2 pwmcore02-atm.maine.rr.com (204.210.64.253) 7.489 ms 4.991 ms 6.867 ms
3 prbrt01-prrtr01.rr.com (24.218.188.30) 4.968 ms 5.293 ms 22.279 ms
4 bsgsr01-prbrt01.rr.com (24.218.188.26) 7.370 ms 454.815 ms 10.713 ms
5 nygsr01-bsgsr01.rr.com (24.218.188.22) 16.945 ms 16.229 ms 14.833 ms
6 nybrt01-nygsr01.rr.com (24.218.188.5) 15.206 ms 14.960 ms 14.838 ms
7 pnbrt01-nybrt01.rr.com (24.218.188.9) 18.492 ms 18.602 ms 16.900 ms
8 sprint-nap.ibm.net (192.157.69.20) 99.654 ms 19.667 ms 23.998 ms
9 nyor1sr1-5-0.ny.us.ibm.net (198.133.27.6) 22.759 ms 47.171 ms 30.571 ms
10 nyc-br4-s4-p0.ny.us.prserv.net (165.87.140.5) 95.478 ms 107.131 ms 100.180 ms
11 port1br1-10-1-0.pt.uk.ibm.net (152.158.23.25) 101.303 ms 207.499 ms 105.553 ms
12 zuri1br1.zu.ch.ibm.net (152.158.50.1) 143.565 ms 135.260 ms 137.907 ms
13 152.158.98.1 (152.158.98.1) 137.839 ms 144.676 ms 141.434 ms
14 152.158.50.253 (152.158.50.253) 340.122 ms 333.118 ms 275.063 ms
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * zuri1br1-1-2-1.zu.ch.ibm.net (152.158.50.254) 469.613 ms !X *
Since they have a firewall with ACLS on all ports except 80 I think we are testing a firewall instead.
Where did you guys get all that hardware? Wish I had boxen like that. Wish I had a pentium at home at least.
I am able to get updated shots, 12:00:04. Looks like they have a little sun for now....
This article is about geek culture and the fact that in the shadow of a disaster a geeks still love technology, computers and the internet. This is not about a morbid death fetish. Get of your soap box and quit crying. No one is twisting these peoples arms to live where they live. I dont feel bad at all for the dummy who gets crushed because he is stitting in his beach cottage filming the storm surge. Slashdot is looking at this from a geeks perspective if you dont understand that then go read www.cnn.com like the rest of the masses.
I know what I will be reading tonight. I needed to do some reasearch on a paper I am writing on information gathering, and here is a more advanced article right in phrack.
Macs are great, I wish I could afford one. I think a mac would make a great server. They seem stable enough, you could even but a *nix on for command line functionality. Doesnt the BSD's also support the mac family of processors?
"You probably don't even have a clue of what the real use of denial-of-service is"
I thought denial of service was used to deny service? what do you use it for?
Try loggin in as jcarr, jeff, carr, jeffrey, carr, jc,jef and mutilate his name as a password, then toss on a 30 meg dictionary file while your at it.
Unless someone has a remote buffer overflow for telnet or apache 1.3.6?
If his password is like Osd&j23O you loose.
I think we should beat on that LinuxPPC box. I think they should open up DoS attacks also just to prove a point. They should open sendmail and ftp ports also. I mean they have posted the root password on the website already. That is pretty confident if you ask me.
Hmm. looks like they have packet filtering in place, it looks like at the router. That is cheating.
mail w2000its@microsoft.com with bo2k attached. Maybe the backwards compatible stuff will bite them in the arse. =)
Heh, you would like to think that nuclear power plants update hardware / software. The one I consulted for had a P100 running BSDI/2.1 for a mail server.
A ZUI? cool got any links?
This would be great, another Desktop OS. If I were them I would keep it as different from BeOS
System X and windows as possible. Maybe create a 3D desktop as the standard? that would be neato.
I agree that UNIX distros need work to secure them out of the box, the problem is microsoft has no security model for 98/95. NT can be made much more secure with some work; however, I wont allow our firewall to be built on one for a few reasons.
1) Patches releases take to long
2) Stability
3) The UNIX os's have been around for 30 years and poked at longer.
4) Go ahead install that service pack on your critical NT system I dare you.
5) automation.
Thats funny... "yeah I got a RAID 5 Floppy array its 4MB. The disks are hot swapable when the light is out."
I love linux for the fact that I can make a 386/dx 20 a firewall with an http proxy server. I use a 486DX50 at home for my webserver. Pretty snappy with only 28M of ram. I am upgrading to a 486DX 66 and 32M of ram next week. Should be interesting.