Read Tog on Interfaces. Gives an interesting insight in to why you may find command lines perfectly usable whereas the majority of people would prefer something more Humane in the Raskin sense.
Thats pretty neat. Would a Linux cluster on no name x386 harware be cheaper (in terms of hardware). Would it take longer to set up for users of a similar ilk. Would this time cancel out any benefit in the cheaper hardware?
I've been scratching my head since Tuesday. I've not got a clue. Coz its so big I'm guessing it may be pretty well known, but something that has to use a redundant processor...
Any more clues? What size image (if the question make sense for your language) is the result of compiling all this code.
There was me thinking that chauvanism was being condescending towards women, but fortunately I took a second to check with m-w to find the first definition is:
Anyone who thinks their Java is safe should try running some class files through JAD. You'd be surprised how complete a decompilation is usually available.
Oracle has had statistics based opimization since release 7. Its been the default since release 8. This is only for Solaris - I'd guess the feature set of 8 got ported to Linux but I could be wrong
Well lets be conservative and say that a/. effect peaks out at 10Mb/s for a minute. Now if his OS can compress that down to the 2Mb/s pipe he has, within the constraints of http I think he's on to an immediate winner. Not being able to do this merely puts him in the same league as any other OS under the sun.
Heh, I was only mucking about, precisely because I'm sitting around business analysts at the moment adding two 'e's on to any noun going. I guess they do it because the added effort of trying to find the right word doesn't really add much value to the job they are doing, but it doesn't stop me taking the piss.
One day I may learn to take things seriously
Every story has an equal and opposite story
on
The Worst Of Times
·
· Score: 1
We get the stuff about the photographs of pre-revolutionary Russia, one of the most interesting stories seen in a long time on/. Then we get this drivel.
Just like I can write to the CORBA 1.0 standard and it will run on any CORBA system, except that it doesn't work beacause the standard wasn't tight enough.
You've been hanging around business analysts too long.
Analyst 1: What shall we call that thing at the other end of the relationship?
Analyst 2: Hmm, just stick a couple of 'e's on the end, nobody will notice.
Who does a king rule over? Kingees, Who's in prison, gaolees, who supports Heart of Midlothian? Jamborees
Its an impedence mismatch to development, however who is to say that Objects are as good on disk represenation of data as they are in memory?
For object databases I've only tried Versant and it had a java interface that looked like C. It gave this tantalizing view of how productive OODBMS could be but kept it just out of reach
Please note that productive doesn't equal performant. Object databases score when you have many complex inter-object relationships, and you're not sure which relationships you are going traverse at run time. They suck for things like reporting - where you access the same data in many different ways - suddenly what was a single query in RDBMS world becomes a set of linking methods and indexing objects. More flexible but more time.
Can someone give a brief outline of the process that this case will go through. I'm guessing that oral arguments are for determining whether there is a case to argue. So what happens next. How does there being apparently three parties involved affect matters. If people don't get the results they desire what will the appeals route be (if 2600 win its would seem almost inevitable that the MPAA will appeal, maybe the gov too)
Slashdot Mirror
Read Tog on Interfaces. Gives an interesting insight in to why you may find command lines perfectly usable whereas the majority of people would prefer something more Humane in the Raskin sense.
Thats pretty neat. Would a Linux cluster on no name x386 harware be cheaper (in terms of hardware). Would it take longer to set up for users of a similar ilk. Would this time cancel out any benefit in the cheaper hardware?
I've been scratching my head since Tuesday. I've not got a clue. Coz its so big I'm guessing it may be pretty well known, but something that has to use a redundant processor...
Any more clues? What size image (if the question make sense for your language) is the result of compiling all this code.
There was me thinking that chauvanism was being condescending towards women, but fortunately I took a second to check with m-w to find the first definition is:
excessive or blind patriotism compare JINGOISM.
That'll learn me.
Anyone who thinks their Java is safe should try running some class files through JAD. You'd be surprised how complete a decompilation is usually available.
25 million lines of code, what were you working on? NT 3.5 only had about 5 million and that was already pretty bloated.
Oracle has had statistics based opimization since release 7. Its been the default since release 8. This is only for Solaris - I'd guess the feature set of 8 got ported to Linux but I could be wrong
The product might turn out to be buggy, but dissing the whole of Taiwan in one sweeping statement is horribly predjudiced
How about the USPTO becomes liable for half of any damages awarded due to granting patents that a court later overturns
Where is Billy Connelly when you need him...
We want it all, and we want it yesterday, and we'll change our mind tomorrow...
Or Dilbert
If we combine these three requirements into one, can we have them all
That old open source saw
If you interested in some results that no one appears to have produced, go do them yourself. Don't criticise someone who has scratched their itch.
Well lets be conservative and say that a /. effect peaks out at 10Mb/s for a minute. Now if his OS can compress that down to the 2Mb/s pipe he has, within the constraints of http I think he's on to an immediate winner. Not being able to do this merely puts him in the same league as any other OS under the sun.
Heh, I was only mucking about, precisely because I'm sitting around business analysts at the moment adding two 'e's on to any noun going. I guess they do it because the added effort of trying to find the right word doesn't really add much value to the job they are doing, but it doesn't stop me taking the piss.
One day I may learn to take things seriously
We get the stuff about the photographs of pre-revolutionary Russia, one of the most interesting stories seen in a long time on /. Then we get this drivel.
When I upgraded my Spectrum from 16K to 48K it cost me £100 (thats pounds sterling) for that 32K.
Just like I can write to the CORBA 1.0 standard and it will run on any CORBA system, except that it doesn't work beacause the standard wasn't tight enough.
A zip file, on a pro unix site, are you out of your tiny little karma-whoring mind?
The offer must be accepted by the offeree
You've been hanging around business analysts too long.
Analyst 1: What shall we call that thing at the other end of the relationship?
Analyst 2: Hmm, just stick a couple of 'e's on the end, nobody will notice.
Who does a king rule over? Kingees, Who's in prison, gaolees, who supports Heart of Midlothian? Jamborees
Its an impedence mismatch to development, however who is to say that Objects are as good on disk represenation of data as they are in memory?
For object databases I've only tried Versant and it had a java interface that looked like C. It gave this tantalizing view of how productive OODBMS could be but kept it just out of reach
Please note that productive doesn't equal performant. Object databases score when you have many complex inter-object relationships, and you're not sure which relationships you are going traverse at run time. They suck for things like reporting - where you access the same data in many different ways - suddenly what was a single query in RDBMS world becomes a set of linking methods and indexing objects. More flexible but more time.
"The answer is always somewhere in the middle."
Removing the endpoints of a line doesn't really lose very much
Though that parser just got a whole lot more complicated because it now has to understand XML schema, rather than well-formedness and DTDs.
The only comment in this thread that is more redundant than yours is this one.
If nobody else finished the assignment its hardly surprising that yours was the quickest implementation
There are only two exceptions to Sturgeon's Law : Sturgeon's Law and crap
Oops I just recursed up my own arse
Can someone give a brief outline of the process that this case will go through. I'm guessing that oral arguments are for determining whether there is a case to argue. So what happens next. How does there being apparently three parties involved affect matters. If people don't get the results they desire what will the appeals route be (if 2600 win its would seem almost inevitable that the MPAA will appeal, maybe the gov too)