Slashdot Mirror


User: RoLi

RoLi's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,355
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,355

  1. Re:Mix code in long mode? on Introduction to 64-bit Computing and x86-64 · · Score: 1
    There is really no need, just code up a simple "runme.sh" that uses

    cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name"

    and launches the corresponding executable.

  2. Re:Cost advantage? on Introduction to 64-bit Computing and x86-64 · · Score: 1
    While that might be true right now, we will hit the 4GB-wall (which is a 2GB wall in many cases) pretty soon.

    So with Opteron coming out in mid/late 2003 it is right on time.

    In a lot of cases, over 4GB of memory make more sense than more than 2 GHz.

    Also, I don't know what "extra cost and administration time" you are talking about.

  3. Will Microsoft survive the 64-Bit transition? on Introduction to 64-bit Computing and x86-64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The 64-Bit transition comes with a lot things, all bad for Microsoft:

    • For the first time in computing history AMD and Intel no longer see Microsoft as the sole software provider. Both Intel and AMD support Linux from day 1 on their 64-chips. I repeat: That did not happen before. So far, Linux was never available on a chip's introduction.
    • On Operon and Itanium, Linux is available before Windows.
    • In the first 1 or 2 years, 64-chips will be mainly used on servers, where Linux is already strong.
    • To use the additional features/registers, a recompile is neccessary - OSS will use those features right away, while CSS vendors will take quite some time to release a 64-Bit version and will probably want some money for the upgrade.
    • The traditional Windows-on-servers customer is a very conservative market segment not likely to jump on the 64-Bit bandwagon very early.

    To summarize, Microsoft might run into a chicken-and-egg problem on 64-Bits: Nobody runs Windows on 64-Bits because it's not faster -> Nobody makes Win64 software -> Nobody runs Windows on 64-Bits.

    Add into that the fact that Microsoft is traditionally very incompetent and slow when it comes to adopting new architectures and you get the idea.

    I think that Microsoft will lose the majority of their server marketshare and a large chunk of their desktop marketshare during that transition. Simple market inertia will prevent Microsoft to be thrown out of the desktop market, but because of the 64-Bit transition, the Linux desktop market might finally gain critical mass and endanger the Windows domination in the long term.

  4. Re:My mini review... on LinuxPlanet Reviews KDE 3.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Konqueror - A very good browser. Fails to correctly render a few sites (sadly perlmonks home page is one of those). Doesn't support tabbed browsing. But it's nice to have a browser properly integrated with KDE, so I'm giving up hope on tabbed browsing for a little while - so far it's the only real thing I miss from Mozilla.

    Tabbed browsing is on the KDE 3.1 feature list, so it won't be a long while until you can have tabbed browsing in Konqui. Probably 3 or 4 months, but definitely still in this year.

  5. Re:KDE's appearance on LinuxPlanet Reviews KDE 3.0 · · Score: 1
    Well, that's the great thing about KDE3.0:

    You get the stability and polish from a .3 release, but the marketing hype and media attention from a .0 release.

    KDE 3.0 will make big inroads, while KDE 2.3 wouldn't.