I get we came in last because thats what the article "implied" by its summary. Since I *always* rely on CNN as the most balanced of all news reporting agencies holding itself to the highest standards in journalism, I was kinda suprised by this article. In short, it says all of them are good. Sez w2k has all these neato keeno features, and redhat has'em too, just not as cool. Sez w2k is better than NT, and rh is good too, just not as good, better at some things, but w2k is still cool. Netware is real fast, but w2k is better, thought not as fast, but we may have made a mistake in how we set it up. And All this other *crap*. The article is worthless. It goes on to state some points of view that I also share, is pretty kind to all, but basicly wraps up with RH is okay if you are a tight-wad and cheap-skate and only need skeletal services and can't afford to play with the big dogs. What a bunch of non-sense.
Slashdot Mirror
I get we came in last because thats what the article "implied" by its summary. Since I *always* rely on CNN as the most balanced of all news reporting agencies holding itself to the highest standards in journalism, I was kinda suprised by this article. In short, it says all of them are good. Sez w2k has all these neato keeno features, and redhat has'em too, just not as cool. Sez w2k is better than NT, and rh is good too, just not as good, better at some things, but w2k is still cool. Netware is real fast, but w2k is better, thought not as fast, but we may have made a mistake in how we set it up. And All this other *crap*. The article is worthless. It goes on to state some points of view that I also share, is pretty kind to all, but basicly wraps up with RH is okay if you are a tight-wad and cheap-skate and only need skeletal services and can't afford to play with the big dogs. What a bunch of non-sense.