Playboy auctioned-off some photos that included notes. One said, "Butt too big - flatten," while a different girl said "But too flat; make rounder". So it can go either way. --- They also had a very strange note on a third girl about "Nipple too pointy; trim in half." Personally I like pointy nipples so I don't know why the editors felt any reason to alter it, but whatever.
The end result is a photo of a woman that doesn't really exist. In contrast the old 1960s photo is a real person with virtually no alteration.
"Because the human body is created by God, it may be without clothes and still reflect the holiness of its Creator." - Pope John Paul II. In other words nudity is not sinful because the body is not sinful. It is created in God's image.
What? She looks cute to me (link below). Also it's worth noting today's playmates are not real and therefore not comparable. They are photoshopped to remove blemishes, expand breasts, erase fat knees, give them flatter butts, and so on. http://www.google.com/images?q=de+de+lind&um=1&client=seamonkey
>>>>Palin map with the candidates name AND a crosshair on it
That never happened Mr. Liar. ALSO: Is this the comment you wanted me to see? "Congresswoman Giffords was known for her desire to crack down on illegal aliens and secure the southern border, putting her at odds with Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress." I doubt anybody affiliated with Obama would do this, but can easily imagine Van Jones, George Soros or similar persons doing it. The other possibility is that it's just a nut, like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building. We'll just have to wait and see.
Of course the Dems/MSNBC are already blaming people like me (tea partier) and I didn't have anything to do with it. MSNBC received several billion in taxpayer dollars to spread this propaganda.
(1) You insult tea partiers. (2) You insult the mentally-handicapped. (3) And your reward for this juvenile behavior is "Insightful"??? That's frakked up. If you cannot speak to me or others without the teenage/childish insults, and handle an adult-to-adult conversation with respect towards one another, then you have nothing to say that I want to hear.
Bullshit Your ignorance of the GPL and licensing terms in general is astounding.
Shove your rudeness up your pussy!!! Goddamn ignorant fool. If the copyright has expired, then the code is PUBLIC DOMAIN you stupid brainless father-fucking smeghead. You don't need to license public domain art or programs you ignorant father-fuckig bitch. That's WHY it is called public domain. Example: You don't need to license Tom Sawyer to use it. Or the "Hello world" program.
>>>They previously promised more then they are now able to deliver.
That's true. Anybody who understands EM spectrum also knows it can only carry so much information. With DSL or FiOS or Cable you can multiply spectrum by laying more cables, but not so with the wireless spectrum. It fills-up and then you're done. It sounds like T-Mobile UK has simply run out of space. .
>>>This is bordering on false advertising, made legal only by a line of small print that allows them to change the contract any time they wish.
At which point you can refuse to accept the new terms, and terminate the contract.
Wonderful Life was considered a flop by the studios. They left it fall into public domain in the 1970s to 80s, and that's why TV stations kept playing it over-and-over (it was free). You could also buy it cheap on VHS from random companies..... then it became popular with americans, so the Megacorps hired a bunch of lawyers to RE-copyright it. Probably included some judge bribery as well.
After the original programmer/author loses his copyright (28 years?), the GPL code falls into public domain. At that point you no longer need to abide by the license.
There's no such thing as "abandonware". You've invented a term that is popular but doesn't actually exist in legal parlance. There's copyrighted work like 1928's Steamboat Willie, and then there's uncopyrighted work like 1946's It's A Wonderful Life (the license was not renewed) AKA public domain. Since this MTR program is only 10 years, the copyright has Not run out yet.
Somebody created a program called MTR, and a web company modified it to WinMTR and stole the author's labor without payment. Is that the general gist of it? Sounds like something RIAA/MPAA, record, and Movie Companies would do.
>>>>Palin map with the candidates name AND a crosshair on it
That never happened you lying Liberal son of a bitch. ALSO: Is this the comment you wanted me to see? "Congresswoman Giffords was known for her desire to crack down on illegal aliens and secure the southern border, putting her at odds with Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress."
I doubt anybody affiliated with Obama would do this, but can easily imagine ACORN or similar organization doing it. The other possibility is that it's just a nut, like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building. We'll just have to wait and see. Of course the Dems/MSNBC are already blaming people like me (tea partier) and I didn't have anything to do with it.
>>>>>>Palin put a crosshairs over the congresswoman's face in a political setting. >>> >>>Source or it didn't happen. And before you link, how do I know that came from Palin is not just some image made by somebody else? >> >> March 23, 2010 4:49 PM on CBSNews.com: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001021-503544.html [cbsne
So where is it? I don't see any "crosshairs over the congresswoman" in your link! Lying piece of communo-democratic shit.
I don't know what that response meant. YOU claimed the British protesters were more-civilized than the protesters/police at Kent University. BUT "off with their heads! Off with their heads!" is what the British citizens were yelling when they attacked Prince Charles car. - And so I repeat my question: Does that sound like the British protestors were being reasonable, or any better-behaved than americans?
>>>Palin put a crosshairs over the congresswoman's face in a political setting.
Source or it didn't happen. And before you link, how do I know that came from Palin is not just some image made by somebody else? .
>>>It's really not the time for Fox and the right wing republicans to be making jokes about shooting people.
Neither is it time for White House *employees* like Van Jones (and others whose names I forget) to be going 'round giving speeches about revolution and "hitting them over the head" if they oppose the white house. C'mon. These people are *on the taxpayer paycheck* and should not be saying things like that. One could argue Alex Jones, FOX, and other private companies are nuts but at least they are on their OWN dollar, not the taxpayer dollar.
The reason why the Second Amendment was included is for the same reason why the US Founders used guns to revolt against the British parliament. Without guns they would not have succeeded, and we'd still be the British colonies, or possibly a British Commonwealth country like Canada rather than independent like India.
Slashdot Mirror
>>>the average woman is 5'1" and overweight.
That isn't true if you limit your sample size to 25 and younger, like Playboy does. Then it's more like 5'5" and normal weight.
>>>FLATTER butts?
Playboy auctioned-off some photos that included notes. One said, "Butt too big - flatten," while a different girl said "But too flat; make rounder". So it can go either way. --- They also had a very strange note on a third girl about "Nipple too pointy; trim in half." Personally I like pointy nipples so I don't know why the editors felt any reason to alter it, but whatever.
The end result is a photo of a woman that doesn't really exist. In contrast the old 1960s photo is a real person with virtually no alteration.
>>>Go ahead and reconcile these two things:
"Because the human body is created by God, it may be without clothes and still reflect the holiness of its Creator." - Pope John Paul II. In other words nudity is not sinful because the body is not sinful. It is created in God's image.
What? She looks cute to me (link below). Also it's worth noting today's playmates are not real and therefore not comparable. They are photoshopped to remove blemishes, expand breasts, erase fat knees, give them flatter butts, and so on.
http://www.google.com/images?q=de+de+lind&um=1&client=seamonkey
>>>The US national debt: $126,000 per taxpayer. Spent enough yet? [usdebtclock.org]
I like to use the Per household" numbers which is 14 trillion divided by ~100 million homes == ~$140,000 per US household
.
>>>adding political material to the supposed child-porn black list has only happened in every country that has every implemented
I didn't realize that.
Got a citation?
Does your definition of "child porn" also include nude children or teens?
I bet the politicians' definition does.
It is suppression of nudism.
Yep! I used less than 10 minutes, no texts, and zero MB data.
I'm on the $0/month plan.
And 20 c/minute.
>>>>Palin map with the candidates name AND a crosshair on it
That never happened Mr. Liar.
ALSO: Is this the comment you wanted me to see? "Congresswoman Giffords was known for her desire to crack down on illegal aliens and secure the southern border, putting her at odds with Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress." I doubt anybody affiliated with Obama would do this, but can easily imagine Van Jones, George Soros or similar persons doing it. The other possibility is that it's just a nut, like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building. We'll just have to wait and see.
Of course the Dems/MSNBC are already blaming people like me (tea partier) and I didn't have anything to do with it. MSNBC received several billion in taxpayer dollars to spread this propaganda.
Like one base station per house? ;-)
Might as well just install fiber directly into the owner's wall.
>>>They're blaming nutbag teatards
(1) You insult tea partiers. (2) You insult the mentally-handicapped. (3) And your reward for this juvenile behavior is "Insightful"??? That's frakked up. If you cannot speak to me or others without the teenage/childish insults, and handle an adult-to-adult conversation with respect towards one another, then you have nothing to say that I want to hear.
Bullshit Your ignorance of the GPL and licensing terms in general is astounding.
Shove your rudeness up your pussy!!! Goddamn ignorant fool. If the copyright has expired, then the code is PUBLIC DOMAIN you stupid brainless father-fucking smeghead. You don't need to license public domain art or programs you ignorant father-fuckig bitch. That's WHY it is called public domain.
Example: You don't need to license Tom Sawyer to use it.
Or the "Hello world" program.
AND ONCE AGAIN YOU LINK TO AN IMAGE THAT DOES *not* SHOW A TARGET OVER Congresswoman Giffords face (original claim) or name (current claim).
>>>They'll just report that you have an arrears balance, which will destroy your credit rating
Hardly. If you have an already-excellent rating, and just one dispute ("guy terminated contract"), you will STILL have a very-high rating overall.
Breach of contract (no service) and by their own admission (map shows poor). You no longer need to pay.
>>>They previously promised more then they are now able to deliver.
That's true. Anybody who understands EM spectrum also knows it can only carry so much information. With DSL or FiOS or Cable you can multiply spectrum by laying more cables, but not so with the wireless spectrum. It fills-up and then you're done. It sounds like T-Mobile UK has simply run out of space.
.
>>>This is bordering on false advertising, made legal only by a line of small print that allows them to change the contract any time they wish.
At which point you can refuse
to accept the new terms, and
terminate the contract.
>>>Palin map with the candidates name AND a crosshair on it
I don't see an image of this. You keep making this claim, but none of your links show it. You are inventing FUD/.
Wonderful Life was considered a flop by the studios.
They left it fall into public domain in the 1970s to 80s, and that's why TV stations kept playing it over-and-over (it was free). You could also buy it cheap on VHS from random companies..... then it became popular with americans, so the Megacorps hired a bunch of lawyers to RE-copyright it. Probably included some judge bribery as well.
After the original programmer/author loses his copyright (28 years?), the GPL code falls into public domain. At that point you no longer need to abide by the license.
There's no such thing as "abandonware".
You've invented a term that is popular but doesn't actually exist in legal parlance. There's copyrighted work like 1928's Steamboat Willie, and then there's uncopyrighted work like 1946's It's A Wonderful Life (the license was not renewed) AKA public domain. Since this MTR program is only 10 years, the copyright has Not run out yet.
Somebody created a program called MTR, and a web company modified it to WinMTR and stole the author's labor without payment. Is that the general gist of it?
Sounds like something RIAA/MPAA, record, and Movie Companies would do.
>>>>Palin map with the candidates name AND a crosshair on it
That never happened you lying Liberal son of a bitch. ALSO: Is this the comment you wanted me to see? "Congresswoman Giffords was known for her desire to crack down on illegal aliens and secure the southern border, putting her at odds with Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress."
I doubt anybody affiliated with Obama would do this, but can easily imagine ACORN or similar organization doing it. The other possibility is that it's just a nut, like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building. We'll just have to wait and see. Of course the Dems/MSNBC are already blaming people like me (tea partier) and I didn't have anything to do with it.
>>>>>>Palin put a crosshairs over the congresswoman's face in a political setting.
>>>
>>>Source or it didn't happen. And before you link, how do I know that came from Palin is not just some image made by somebody else?
>>
>> March 23, 2010 4:49 PM on CBSNews.com: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001021-503544.html [cbsne
So where is it?
I don't see any "crosshairs over
the congresswoman" in your link!
Lying piece of communo-democratic shit.
>>>UK citizens don't live in a fantasy world.
I don't know what that response meant. YOU claimed the British protesters were more-civilized than the protesters/police at Kent University. BUT "off with their heads! Off with their heads!" is what the British citizens were yelling when they attacked Prince Charles car. - And so I repeat my question: Does that sound like the British protestors were being reasonable, or any better-behaved than americans?
>>>Palin put a crosshairs over the congresswoman's face in a political setting.
Source or it didn't happen. And before you link, how do I know that came from Palin is not just some image made by somebody else?
.
>>>It's really not the time for Fox and the right wing republicans to be making jokes about shooting people.
Neither is it time for White House *employees* like Van Jones (and others whose names I forget) to be going 'round giving speeches about revolution and "hitting them over the head" if they oppose the white house. C'mon. These people are *on the taxpayer paycheck* and should not be saying things like that. One could argue Alex Jones, FOX, and other private companies are nuts but at least they are on their OWN dollar, not the taxpayer dollar.
The reason why the Second Amendment was included is for the same reason why the US Founders used guns to revolt against the British parliament. Without guns they would not have succeeded, and we'd still be the British colonies, or possibly a British Commonwealth country like Canada rather than independent like India.