This is the silliest of false dichotomies. It's not a luxury because it's so widely and cheaply available. It's not a human right because it's a proper commodity like everything else.
Not everything that is desirable is a human right.
Exactly. Given the question would you rather work for
a) a jerk who is always right or
b) a nice person who is always wrong,
i'd pencil in:
c) a nice person who is occasionally wrong.
Otherwise, it's a false dichotomy.
I agree. In fact, even if you don't have a system as such, simply using the line "it's in my queue", or giving them a time slot -- "you're scheduled between 2-3" -- is helpful.
Slashdot Mirror
"Hi, I'm interested in studying X. What's best manual to read?" Internet Misanthrope: "READ THE FUCKING MANUAL, DUMBASS"
"Hi, i'm interested in studying X, where's the best place to start?" Internet misanthrope: "READ THE FUCKING MANUAL DUMBASS"
This is the silliest of false dichotomies. It's not a luxury because it's so widely and cheaply available. It's not a human right because it's a proper commodity like everything else. Not everything that is desirable is a human right.
Personally, i can see an upside to all this... I can't wait to go for a dive in Lake Vostok
Exactly. Given the question would you rather work for a) a jerk who is always right or b) a nice person who is always wrong, i'd pencil in: c) a nice person who is occasionally wrong. Otherwise, it's a false dichotomy.
I agree. In fact, even if you don't have a system as such, simply using the line "it's in my queue", or giving them a time slot -- "you're scheduled between 2-3" -- is helpful.
Stop Celebrating!! 1.0 is only a number!! Don't you get it?? The pedants have spoken.