I haven't read this book, and I'm not sure I want too, because it seems to be overkill. Bicyclists in search of a practical, down-to-earth analysis of the bike might check out the prodigious writings of Jobst Brandt, a mechanical engineer and avid touring rider. Brandt eschews quantum mechanics and other irrelevancies and instead analyzes and explains the real problems of bicycles. Most notably, Brandt published The Bicycle Wheel, the definitive text on the function, response, and building of spoked wheels. I used it to select parts for and to build my current wheels and let me tell you, building your first set of bike wheels is even more interesting than building your first PC.
Brandt is a tourer of some note. His Alpine and Sierra Nevada tours are legendary and have inspired a lot of cyclists.
You can access and search Brandt's writings via USENET: try looking at rec.bicycles.tech.
The best supercomputers aren't here because Americans are some superior people. They are here because 1) we have the money to buy them 2) we need them for our nukers 3) American firms dominate the CPU market.
Oxford is in the U.K. Our last president went there to study. Stanford is in California, which may or may not be a foreign country.
Check your nationalism at the door when you talk about science. How many of the "American professors" other countries are "beg"ging for are of non-native extraction? American postwar science was built on the knowledge of refugee scientists. Werhner von Braun? Enrico Fermi? Edward Teller? von Neumann?
I hate it when the press makes it sound like America is the jack-ass backwards donkey of the supercomputing world. This writer implies the Japanese and Europeans have vastly superior computing power. This is clearly the notion of a chucklehead. Take a look at The Top 500. By its (Linpack) metric, 8 of the top 10 machines are in America. Three of them are DEDICATED to weather or environmental work (Naval Oceanographic Office, National Centers for Environmental Prediction). A fourth one at NERSC is relatively open, compared to defense machines, and I'd be willing to bet weather code is running on it regularly. These are all teraflops machines. Japan has the other two in the top 10. Anybody know the job mix on those two? Europe's fastest machine is the Hitachi in Muenchen. The fastest dedicated European weather machiens are the T3Es at the Deutscher Wetterdienst and at the UK Meteorological Office.
I don't buy these whiny weathermen's complaints. The difference is that the American machines are all massively parallel machines (mostly IBM SP). The Japanese manufacturers all make vector machines, some of which the Europeans use. The Cray T3E is kind of a weird in-between architecture. It takes a good programmer to use a MPP to its full capability. The vector users, on the other hand, have 30 years of old code and practice which keeps them in the game. If the Americans would suck it up and learn to use their amazingly fast IBMs we would hear whining from the other side of both ponds. If you try to run your old code for the Cray C90 on an IBM SP, you are going to get terrible performance. If you rewrite the code, you may get great performance. But these guys aren't rewriting the code. Take for example the machines at NCEP. These create the daily production weather models used all over the US. They are IBMs which replaced a Cray that self-immolated about 1.5 years ago. When they brought the new machines up, I wonder if they rewrote the code beyond making it run?
If you know, enlighten us!
Slashdot Mirror
I haven't read this book, and I'm not sure I want too, because it seems to be overkill. Bicyclists in search of a practical, down-to-earth analysis of the bike might check out the prodigious writings of Jobst Brandt, a mechanical engineer and avid touring rider. Brandt eschews quantum mechanics and other irrelevancies and instead analyzes and explains the real problems of bicycles. Most notably, Brandt published The Bicycle Wheel, the definitive text on the function, response, and building of spoked wheels. I used it to select parts for and to build my current wheels and let me tell you, building your first set of bike wheels is even more interesting than building your first PC.
Brandt is a tourer of some note. His Alpine and Sierra Nevada tours are legendary and have inspired a lot of cyclists.
You can access and search Brandt's writings via USENET: try looking at rec.bicycles.tech.
Oxford is in the U.K. Our last president went there to study. Stanford is in California, which may or may not be a foreign country.
Check your nationalism at the door when you talk about science. How many of the "American professors" other countries are "beg"ging for are of non-native extraction? American postwar science was built on the knowledge of refugee scientists. Werhner von Braun? Enrico Fermi? Edward Teller? von Neumann?
I hate it when the press makes it sound like America is the jack-ass backwards donkey of the supercomputing world. This writer implies the Japanese and Europeans have vastly superior computing power. This is clearly the notion of a chucklehead. Take a look at The Top 500. By its (Linpack) metric, 8 of the top 10 machines are in America. Three of them are DEDICATED to weather or environmental work (Naval Oceanographic Office, National Centers for Environmental Prediction). A fourth one at NERSC is relatively open, compared to defense machines, and I'd be willing to bet weather code is running on it regularly. These are all teraflops machines. Japan has the other two in the top 10. Anybody know the job mix on those two? Europe's fastest machine is the Hitachi in Muenchen. The fastest dedicated European weather machiens are the T3Es at the Deutscher Wetterdienst and at the UK Meteorological Office.
I don't buy these whiny weathermen's complaints. The difference is that the American machines are all massively parallel machines (mostly IBM SP). The Japanese manufacturers all make vector machines, some of which the Europeans use. The Cray T3E is kind of a weird in-between architecture. It takes a good programmer to use a MPP to its full capability. The vector users, on the other hand, have 30 years of old code and practice which keeps them in the game. If the Americans would suck it up and learn to use their amazingly fast IBMs we would hear whining from the other side of both ponds. If you try to run your old code for the Cray C90 on an IBM SP, you are going to get terrible performance. If you rewrite the code, you may get great performance. But these guys aren't rewriting the code. Take for example the machines at NCEP. These create the daily production weather models used all over the US. They are IBMs which replaced a Cray that self-immolated about 1.5 years ago. When they brought the new machines up, I wonder if they rewrote the code beyond making it run? If you know, enlighten us!