> Of course, you'll pay a hefty premium ($50 more > for the Plextor SCSI, or 300% compared to > Lite-On, Cyberdrive, or other inexpensive CD-RWs) > and get a much slower drive (12/10/32 vs 40/12/40 > or 40/12/52).
There is still Yamaha: it's latest "F1" (44x I think) is going to be available in:
- internal IDE
- internal SCSI (but more expensive)
- external USB
- external SCSI
- external Firewire
- combo external USB+Firewire
BTW, SCSI is still much better quality when it comes to disks: not only performance but also MTBF etc.
Cheers, Christophe.
= "If there is a better solution... find it." -- Thomas Edison =
Well.. I totally agree with you. In fact, the *only* advantage of XMLRPC, SOAP, etc. you-name-it, is that ... it's *not CORBA* ! That's why MS is behind it. How could they say now: go to CORBA, it's the way.. They can't!:-D
Slashdot Mirror
> Of course, you'll pay a hefty premium ($50 more
> for the Plextor SCSI, or 300% compared to
> Lite-On, Cyberdrive, or other inexpensive CD-RWs)
> and get a much slower drive (12/10/32 vs 40/12/40
> or 40/12/52).
There is still Yamaha: it's latest "F1" (44x I
think) is going to be available in:
- internal IDE
- internal SCSI (but more expensive)
- external USB
- external SCSI
- external Firewire
- combo external USB+Firewire
BTW, SCSI is still much better quality when it
comes to disks: not only performance but also
MTBF etc.
Cheers,
Christophe.
= "If there is a better solution... find it." -- Thomas Edison =
Well.. I totally agree with you. In fact, the *only* :-D
advantage of XMLRPC, SOAP, etc. you-name-it, is that
... it's *not CORBA* ! That's why MS is behind it. How could
they say now: go to CORBA, it's the way.. They can't!