The Constitution is not a "living" document! It's a contract that cannot be changed without proper consent. People have a right to religious freedom even if there views seem nutty. They just don't have a right to impose their religious views on others.
Also, science neither discovers absolute truth(Godelian incompleteness) nor discovers truth absolutely(never have certainty) so it's founded on assumptions. Truthfully, evolution isn't a fact; it's just as apparent as gravity. So you could rationally deny evolution, but you'd have to deny gravity as we know it. I also don't see how evolution contradicts the Scriptures.
Slashdot Mirror
The Constitution is not a "living" document! It's a contract that cannot be changed without proper consent. People have a right to religious freedom even if there views seem nutty. They just don't have a right to impose their religious views on others. Also, science neither discovers absolute truth(Godelian incompleteness) nor discovers truth absolutely(never have certainty) so it's founded on assumptions. Truthfully, evolution isn't a fact; it's just as apparent as gravity. So you could rationally deny evolution, but you'd have to deny gravity as we know it. I also don't see how evolution contradicts the Scriptures.