This is a necessary technology for powering devices (not cars - given the conversion/efficiency/pollution costs) that need portable and dense energy sources - such as planes and ships (fast movers - since robotic sail freighters can work off of solar/wind). The idea that we could replace current fossil fuel usage with hydrocarbon-based fuels from sustainable energy sources is possible but rather idiotic. Conversion losses would be significant and would only perpetuate a system that was only possible due to our amazing bounty of fossil fuels.
ALL of our energy comes from solar (fossil fuels, wind, solar energy), radioactive isotopes or in some cases gravity-based (geothermal - though you could consider this solar since the sun is the largest gravity sink affecting us). Of course, we need to convert it from the original source to something that is fit for purpose. Hydrocarbon-based fuels are fit for purpose for high-density energy needs. If we come up with better high-density energy sources, we'll no longer need to convert some of our wind/solar/geo/tidal/... to hydrocarbon-based fuels.
BTW - wouldn't it be amazing if we could price our energy usage based on total cost (e.g. environmental, without government subsidies, military support needs, oil-financed terrorist activity/response, long-term health,...). I wonder how many dollars/gallon gas would cost taking that into account ($10, $15, $20).
You can take a look at Parabon Computing, Entropia and United Devices. I think these companies are probably the furthest along in this area. They have been running on the Internet for a while in beta mode and are starting to get commercial contracts for both internet and intranet services.
I would suggest trying to work a deal with them in promoting their client on your ISP customers. Their clients can run code from various computationally needy customers. They handle the problems with scheduling, the distribution of jobs, customer relations, etc.
Parabon Computing and United Devices both run customer Java code in the JVM which is installed on every client as part of their client-side application. They can therefore (theoretically) run on Windows/Mac/Unix/etc. I'm pretty sure both have multiple OS clients at this point. Entropia's client, last I checked, could only run on Windows as it uses a Windows specific 'sandbox'. The advantage with Entropia is they can theoretically run all sorts of binary, script, Java code without security problems.
Good luck in setting this up. If you would like some contact numbers for any of these companies, let me know (w s hayes @ mindspring dot com).
Slashdot Mirror
This is a necessary technology for powering devices (not cars - given the conversion/efficiency/pollution costs) that need portable and dense energy sources - such as planes and ships (fast movers - since robotic sail freighters can work off of solar/wind). The idea that we could replace current fossil fuel usage with hydrocarbon-based fuels from sustainable energy sources is possible but rather idiotic. Conversion losses would be significant and would only perpetuate a system that was only possible due to our amazing bounty of fossil fuels.
ALL of our energy comes from solar (fossil fuels, wind, solar energy), radioactive isotopes or in some cases gravity-based (geothermal - though you could consider this solar since the sun is the largest gravity sink affecting us). Of course, we need to convert it from the original source to something that is fit for purpose. Hydrocarbon-based fuels are fit for purpose for high-density energy needs. If we come up with better high-density energy sources, we'll no longer need to convert some of our wind/solar/geo/tidal/... to hydrocarbon-based fuels.
BTW - wouldn't it be amazing if we could price our energy usage based on total cost (e.g. environmental, without government subsidies, military support needs, oil-financed terrorist activity/response, long-term health,...). I wonder how many dollars/gallon gas would cost taking that into account ($10, $15, $20).
I would suggest trying to work a deal with them in promoting their client on your ISP customers. Their clients can run code from various computationally needy customers. They handle the problems with scheduling, the distribution of jobs, customer relations, etc.
Parabon Computing and United Devices both run customer Java code in the JVM which is installed on every client as part of their client-side application. They can therefore (theoretically) run on Windows/Mac/Unix/etc. I'm pretty sure both have multiple OS clients at this point. Entropia's client, last I checked, could only run on Windows as it uses a Windows specific 'sandbox'. The advantage with Entropia is they can theoretically run all sorts of binary, script, Java code without security problems.
Good luck in setting this up. If you would like some contact numbers for any of these companies, let me know (w s hayes @ mindspring dot com).