Slashdot Mirror


User: sycodon

sycodon's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,795
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,795

  1. Re:NASA budget is two days expenditure by the US on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    My son had go see the Dr. today. Called at 8 and got a 9:30 appointment. Been that way since I started working in 1986.

    Maybe you are the one whose been lied to.

  2. Re:NASA budget is two days expenditure by the US on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    We've all read about how they keep people Healthy over there.

    Just don't ask for a glass of water.

  3. Re:NASA budget is two days expenditure by the US on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    Doesn't take much effort

  4. Re:Money, money, money on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    GameboyRMH gets his news from the Daily Show and Foreign Policy insight from Cracked.

    This is America's future.

    Abandon all hope.

  5. Re:Money, money, money on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    It's all our fault eh?

    Shouldn't you be out defecating on a Police Car or something?

  6. Re:Answer: No, it isn't on Is the OMB Trying To End Planetary Exploration? · · Score: 1

    De-fund Congress and we'd all be better off.

  7. Re:Just another form of show business on Behind the Scenes: How Conflict Photographs Come To Be · · Score: 1

    they have only one overriding ideology - increasing ratings to gain influence, and more importantly, to get more of that almighty dollar bill.

    Hmmm...MSNBC's obvious slant and piss poor ratings argue against this. But they do seem to operate by another set of rules than other networks.

  8. Re:Just another form of show business on Behind the Scenes: How Conflict Photographs Come To Be · · Score: 1

    Journalists twist and manipulate facts to match their political narrative.

    Shocker.

  9. Re:Sick of it... on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    And in 10 years most of these protestors will be married, have children and be working for the very same corporations they are protesting.

  10. Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1
  11. Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    Most of the people posting on this topic are probably at the protests, posting on Slashdot using their iPhones.

  12. Re:Sick of it... on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    Using their iPhones and Blackberrys and toting Starbucks cups.

  13. Re:The 1% are insulated on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    Hear Hear!

  14. Re:The 1% are insulated on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    You are the Eeeeevil "rich".

  15. Re:The 1% are insulated on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 0

    Here is a very good description of the protestors

  16. Re:Shut the fuck up on Is the Creative Class Engine Sputtering? · · Score: 2

    Ferriers
    Blacksmiths
    Typesetters
    Lamplighters
    Elevator Operators
    Milkman
    Stables
    etc.

    I don't recall any mass suicides when each of these occupations were rendered obsolete.

  17. Re:Shut the fuck up on Is the Creative Class Engine Sputtering? · · Score: 2

    So an industry sector was made obsolete due to more innovative ways of distributing content. And?

    This is why History and in particular U.S. Economic History needs to be taught more.

    Things change. Industries die, new ones are created. Markets shift. New markets created

    Get the fuck over it.

    Or, you could go Occupy something a whine that you can't fine a decent job with your Liberal Studies degree.

  18. Re:I am offended on NY Senators Want To Make Free Speech A Privilege · · Score: 1

    Well, if you are not an America, then you are a foreigner using my frame of reference.

    I don't get it. Were you responding to someone else?

  19. Re:Bullshit on NY Senators Want To Make Free Speech A Privilege · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wasn't that long ago that it would be normal and acceptable to kick the shit out the bully.

    Ahh...those were the good old days.

  20. Re:I am offended on NY Senators Want To Make Free Speech A Privilege · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great. Foreigners are getting their news about America from the Daily Show.

    But then, I learned everything about Great Britain from the Benny Hill Show.

  21. Re:Fact-based solutions already exist on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1

    A government where Science is king would perform the risk/benefit analysis and mandate a course of action based on the results, whether the people like it or not.

  22. Re:Fact-based solutions already exist on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1

    So that is not a "Science based government". It's a political government reacting to facts, or not, depending on the circumstances and popular opinion.

    A true science based government would say "Science says A, therefore our response is B".

    A political government says "Science says A, therefore or response is B...or C...maybe D, wait, election is coming up so none of the above."

  23. Here's your Scientific Government on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1
  24. Re:Fact-based solutions already exist on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1

    In other words, the way to entice someone to build a better mouse trap is to make all the other mouse traps too damned expensive.

    That's not market forces...that's coercion.

  25. Re:Fact-based solutions already exist on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but Science and Government are two incompatible disciplines.

    Science is all about determining the absolute. Facts know no compromise.

    Government is all about moderating the absolute. Government (Politics) is the master of compromise.

    A "Scientific" Government is a dictatorship.