I wonder how youre children will cope with these new-found rights, when they have never known how to use them. I wonder you can define someone as a child based on his/her birthday. I wonder how you can deny a teenager his right to read such things as "Bondage of Man" or any given Ginsburgh poem. Hey, I wonder if next you'll tell your child that he can't read Moby Dick because it's homo-erotic. How soon will you ban National Geographic? People have sex, are nude, act violently, use drugs all the time. To think that you can simply will it away from youre child is to abanddon him/her to a painful and dangerous discovery process. I say dangerous, because I barely escaped mine alive, and many people do not.
actually, more like serendipity, of a coincidental misspelling. freudian slips typically are much more sexual in nature. Ever wonder if Freud was just a man sreaming "Please let it not just be me!!!"?
It seems too often that people read a post, reply to it immediately in a fervor of rage, frenetic that such a person would ever think such a thing, and ignore the fact that ten other people have already stated the exact same message. I think this should be rated down, and marked redundant. STOP BEING SHEEP! BE DIFFERENT! WEAR DRESSES!
what happens when libraries ban certain books, magazines because the majority finds them offensive (hint: 72% of americans have not read Jack Kerouac's on the road, 39% of americans believe it should be banned)
actually, radical is the wrong word for that. You see, a radical christian is looking for an overhaul of all christianity, with a much more liberal approach to Christs teachings. I think you mean extremist, or fundamentalist.
"E. There is no right to view the Internet in the constitution. There is no law that says public computers must have access to all URLs. Stop trying to apply Free Speech in a case where it is not involved." Actually untrue, the logic you use is extremely 451 esque, well the internet hurts people, they cant look at it anymore, books are harmful to people, ban them. The fact of the matter is, every person has the right to have their ideas sought ought and heard. The porn sight owners have a right to provide porn to every person who wants it.
Hey, I am a communist! dont make fun of us! Besides, us weirdos are more outraged at our record in Central America than that in CHina, If Taiwan asks for our help, give it. Drink Bigelow Tea, and eat chiquita bananas, nothing tastes sweeter than 100 years of oppression. love, the shroom
If you steal my car, then in all likelyhood you'll drive it, sell it, do something useful with it, cars aren't designed to kill people (except late 70's american cars) guns are. metaphors are for people who can recognise the difference between death and driving about. love, thhe shroom
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder how youre children will cope with these new-found rights, when they have never known how to use them. I wonder you can define someone as a child based on his/her birthday. I wonder how you can deny a teenager his right to read such things as "Bondage of Man" or any given Ginsburgh poem. Hey, I wonder if next you'll tell your child that he can't read Moby Dick because it's homo-erotic. How soon will you ban National Geographic? People have sex, are nude, act violently, use drugs all the time. To think that you can simply will it away from youre child is to abanddon him/her to a painful and dangerous discovery process. I say dangerous, because I barely escaped mine alive, and many people do not.
actually, more like serendipity, of a coincidental misspelling. freudian slips typically are much more sexual in nature. Ever wonder if Freud was just a man sreaming "Please let it not just be me!!!"?
It seems too often that people read a post, reply to it immediately in a fervor of rage, frenetic that such a person would ever think such a thing, and ignore the fact that ten other people have already stated the exact same message. I think this should be rated down, and marked redundant. STOP BEING SHEEP! BE DIFFERENT! WEAR DRESSES!
what happens when libraries ban certain books, magazines because the majority finds them offensive (hint: 72% of americans have not read Jack Kerouac's on the road, 39% of americans believe it should be banned)
actually, radical is the wrong word for that. You see, a radical christian is looking for an overhaul of all christianity, with a much more liberal approach to Christs teachings. I think you mean extremist, or fundamentalist.
take youre head out of your ass, unless your ego has swelled it to the point you can't. People who attack the proofs are afraid of the thesis
sorry, been up since sometime friday night, and the elves are triny to get my attention . . .
"E. There is no right to view the Internet in the constitution. There is no law that says public computers must have access to all URLs. Stop trying to apply Free Speech in a case where it is not involved." Actually untrue, the logic you use is extremely 451 esque, well the internet hurts people, they cant look at it anymore, books are harmful to people, ban them. The fact of the matter is, every person has the right to have their ideas sought ought and heard. The porn sight owners have a right to provide porn to every person who wants it.
Hey, I am a communist! dont make fun of us! Besides, us weirdos are more outraged at our record in Central America than that in CHina, If Taiwan asks for our help, give it. Drink Bigelow Tea, and eat chiquita bananas, nothing tastes sweeter than 100 years of oppression. love, the shroom
If you steal my car, then in all likelyhood you'll drive it, sell it, do something useful with it, cars aren't designed to kill people (except late 70's american cars) guns are. metaphors are for people who can recognise the difference between death and driving about. love, thhe shroom