I agree with your comments. I was also able to recreate the Solitaire bug. I have been running Win2K since October and have found it to be very stable. I have had very few problems porting over some Windows 98 applications and WinNT 4.0 applications to Windows 2000. Windows 2000 is far more stable than any other MS OS that I've ever seen. As for the 65,000 bugs, I have only seen 2 or 3 since I started using the product. Those that I saw were subsequently fixed or not reproducible by RC3. The current release is working great (both Professional and Advanced Server). And it is the best OS I've ever run on my Dell Inspiron notebook. The bottom line is that Windows 2000 is as big a leap forward as Win3.11 to Win95.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree with your comments. I was also able to recreate the Solitaire bug. I have been running Win2K since October and have found it to be very stable. I have had very few problems porting over some Windows 98 applications and WinNT 4.0 applications to Windows 2000. Windows 2000 is far more stable than any other MS OS that I've ever seen. As for the 65,000 bugs, I have only seen 2 or 3 since I started using the product. Those that I saw were subsequently fixed or not reproducible by RC3. The current release is working great (both Professional and Advanced Server). And it is the best OS I've ever run on my Dell Inspiron notebook. The bottom line is that Windows 2000 is as big a leap forward as Win3.11 to Win95.