Attack the idea, not the language to convey that idea.
Great slogan, don't you think?
Attacking language is the elitists way to diminish and idea without actually touching it. They just assume that because the language is shoddy the idea is shoddy as well.
And about Man-Made Global Warming. I ordinarily would just have this to say: Prove it. And then show how I really don't care as long as no one tries to "fix" it.
But, I'm in a good mood, today. You get a discourse. Lucky you.
Lets start with the obvious target. No not Al Gore. I don't want to be THAT obvious. I'm talking about the "Hockey Stick Graph" that proves that the earth has been warming steadily for the past half a century. But, there is just one problem with that. There is no dips at all. And if the warmest year of the 20th century was 1934 and not 1998, sorry NASA, then there should be a huge frigging climb before it jumped down right around the 1934 to 1950 area on the graph. Kind of suspicious isn't it. And then there is the story about a group of people, that they were scientists has not been confirmed, who managed to get their hands on the equation that created the "Hockey Stick" and found out that even when putting in data progressing from 100 to -100 you still got that "Hockey Stick". While I'm not sure if that story is true it would explain a lot. And then there was the push to have 1998 be named the hottest year of the 20th century. Why was that? It matched the "Hockey Stick Graph". Flawed. Yet they won't toss it out. Kind of like Al Gore.
I did NOT promise that I would not make fun of Al Gore I just said he was too obvious of a target.
I mean I can make the same argument that it was advanced medicine and medical technology that is the cause of global warming. How? Its allowed not only more human beings to live, but more of the livestock as well. And we really are walking heat factories aren't we. That and we produce more global warming gases than our cars do. They only produce CO2. We produce a variety of gases that can and have been declared toxic.
So the solution is clear. Get rid of warning labels and advanced medical techniques. My belief in Darwinism says that the strongest shall survive and we will be stronger as a whole. That and I won't have to deal with idiots over the phone.
Or...we can do nothing and I can finally have that beach front property I wanted so badly here in Arizona.
Attack the idea, not the language to convey that idea.
Great slogan, don't you think?
Attacking language is the elitists way to diminish and idea without actually touching it. They just assume that because the language is shoddy the idea is shoddy as well.
And about Man-Made Global Warming. I ordinarily would just have this to say: Prove it. And then show how I really don't care as long as no one tries to "fix" it.
But, I'm in a good mood, today. You get a discourse. Lucky you.
Lets start with the obvious target. No not Al Gore. I don't want to be THAT obvious. I'm talking about the "Hockey Stick Graph" that proves that the earth has been warming steadily for the past half a century. But, there is just one problem with that. There is no dips at all. And if the warmest year of the 20th century was 1934 and not 1998, sorry NASA, then there should be a huge frigging climb before it jumped down right around the 1934 to 1950 area on the graph. Kind of suspicious isn't it. And then there is the story about a group of people, that they were scientists has not been confirmed, who managed to get their hands on the equation that created the "Hockey Stick" and found out that even when putting in data progressing from 100 to -100 you still got that "Hockey Stick". While I'm not sure if that story is true it would explain a lot. And then there was the push to have 1998 be named the hottest year of the 20th century. Why was that? It matched the "Hockey Stick Graph". Flawed. Yet they won't toss it out. Kind of like Al Gore.
I did NOT promise that I would not make fun of Al Gore I just said he was too obvious of a target.
I mean I can make the same argument that it was advanced medicine and medical technology that is the cause of global warming. How? Its allowed not only more human beings to live, but more of the livestock as well. And we really are walking heat factories aren't we. That and we produce more global warming gases than our cars do. They only produce CO2. We produce a variety of gases that can and have been declared toxic.
So the solution is clear. Get rid of warning labels and advanced medical techniques. My belief in Darwinism says that the strongest shall survive and we will be stronger as a whole. That and I won't have to deal with idiots over the phone.
Or...we can do nothing and I can finally have that beach front property I wanted so badly here in Arizona.
See? Win-Win.