Sure the "encryption" scheme is weak, but it raises an interesting question. What if people started using a third-party real encryption codec which also tells them what to search for using a simple translation dialog? Would it be illegal for RIAA and Napster to reverse engineer this? /Smuffe
In general, the government supports all of Judge Kaplan's "best" positions in his decision: linking is not speech, linking is equivalent to distributing banned content yourself.
Does this mean I can sue Google or other Search Engines for linking me to illegal content?
Smuffe
Slashdot Mirror
Serioulsy, isn't Luke blowing up the Death Star (killing approx. 150000 workers) the ultimate union bashing?
Smuffe
...a user code execute arbitrary code...
This Im not worried about. Its when they start executing specific code that I become scared.
My point exactly. ;D
Start trademarking protocol names and soon you can't write a whole sentence without
Sure the "encryption" scheme is weak, but it raises an interesting question.
What if people started using a third-party real encryption codec which also tells them what to search for using a simple translation dialog? Would it be illegal for RIAA and Napster to reverse engineer this?
/Smuffe
In general, the government supports all of Judge Kaplan's "best" positions in his decision: linking is not speech, linking is equivalent to distributing banned content yourself.
Does this mean I can sue Google or other Search Engines for linking me to illegal content?
Smuffe