Jon Katz's entire article contained no opinions nor offered any insights but simply summarizes news that has already been on Slashdot
Isn't that what objective journalism is? Seems as though everytime an article crops up in which the journalist injects some opinion slashdotters (negativly) brand them as biased. Katz does a peice of a piece of objective journalism and he gets flamed for not being biased.
"MP3.com is yet to produce any stars while most people I have met (as well as myself) who use Napster download music from established artists who have cost the record labels million$ of dollars to find, produce and market" Maybe the death of the rock star is another step in the evolution of the music industry. We just aren't completly there yet.
Isn't that what objective journalism is? Seems as though everytime an article crops up in which the journalist injects some opinion slashdotters (negativly) brand them as biased. Katz does a peice of a piece of objective journalism and he gets flamed for not being biased.
"MP3.com is yet to produce any stars while most people I have met (as well as myself) who use Napster download music from established artists who have cost the record labels million$ of dollars to find, produce and market" Maybe the death of the rock star is another step in the evolution of the music industry. We just aren't completly there yet.