i don't think ultimately comes down to morals. that partner's info is supposed to be hidden, so i think it comes down to the same thing that's up with decss, people found a way around it. i don't think it's necessary to act as though the l.a. times' partner-only info is sacred. you don't tiptoe around the issue that the security is lax.
or, maybe it does come down to morals, and that mine are simply of the mindset that if you're not able or even willing to protect it, you will lose it. the internet is young and needs to evolve, and to play 'good christian' with this stuff is foolish.
wasn't there a link here a while back, maybe it was elsewhere, concerning gait recognition. overlapping camera fields in an airport and this mystical software allowing you to single out people and record bizarre behavior.. (such as a person leaving a piece of baggage alone for an inordinate amount of time?) and letting you to track a person's movements throughout the monitored area.
Slashdot Mirror
i don't think ultimately comes down to morals. that partner's info is supposed to be hidden, so i think it comes down to the same thing that's up with decss, people found a way around it. i don't think it's necessary to act as though the l.a. times' partner-only info is sacred. you don't tiptoe around the issue that the security is lax.
or, maybe it does come down to morals, and that mine are simply of the mindset that if you're not able or even willing to protect it, you will lose it. the internet is young and needs to evolve, and to play 'good christian' with this stuff is foolish.
wasn't there a link here a while back, maybe it was elsewhere, concerning gait recognition. overlapping camera fields in an airport and this mystical software allowing you to single out people and record bizarre behavior.. (such as a person leaving a piece of baggage alone for an inordinate amount of time?) and letting you to track a person's movements throughout the monitored area.