Ya...... I love seeing responses which contain NONE of the points I mentioned. I don't even understand your point because it's based off what you didn't read and couldn't assume. I"m literally amazed you pulled that reply out of no where.
You have a valid point, how ever it was an example. The point is if a woman did touch a man I highly doubt anything would happen even if the man complained. I'm not going to blame chemicals or nature I'm just commenting on the fact of the matter.
I'm just going to break down what I wrote because either you misunderstood it or you don't know how to understand a normal post but in either case I'll help you out.
The first post
Any woman who wears a shirt which is to tight, to showing, to low. A skirt which is to short, to tight. If she wears make up or is hot, is just as guilty as any man. So well you can believe that lie it's not entirely true.
I never mention myself or hint that I'm talking about myself or even hint at any relation to me or me not having a girl friend. The entire direction of the post would state that in general any woman who does that is as guilty as any man.
Second Post
I never said anything about the Muslim world. Second of all if to vs too causes you hardship reading then that is your own issue.
If a woman makes her self all "sexy" or "hot" then she is misconducting herself. If I enter a work place and I have to deal with beautiful women who doll themselves up then I'm put in a situation where my body is being played with even though I might never act. Face it, the second a woman enters the work place dressed up any more then she needs to be she is misconducting herself.
In the same right, if I dress myself up, if I put my self in a state where I know I'm playing with the females around me I'm misconducting myself. I highly doubt this study took into account the fact then women make themselves look good on purpose and in doing so they have misconducted themselves because they want a reaction, which they achieve.
Again I never mention myself directly, I use the term "I" to mean any man which is clear to anyone who can understand simple English. Clearly what is meant to be implied by the post is that I'm not targeting the Muslim culture and that any woman who dresses up or any man who dresses up is causing misconduct. The post really if read correctly is very general in use of terms and very general in overall concepts.
Third Post
The post had nothing to do with not having a girl friend and in fact by your very response you seem to want to objectify women mentally, so by that very post your part of the issue. Everything must be on even playing field, the second you allow one side a handicap you are not longer comparing apples to apples and hence a study or test no longer has meaningful results.
Very clear that I've pointed out the last two posts didn't involve me and that the study isn't realistic because it's not testing all the angles. I mention myself once but only to clear up the fact that you somehow gained a false understanding that I didn't have a girl friend.
Amazing attempt at learning to read but you didn't really get the point I guess.
The post had nothing to do with not having a girl friend and in fact by your very response you seem to want to objectify women mentally, so by that very post your part of the issue. Everything must be on even playing field, the second you allow one side a handicap you are not longer comparing apples to apples and hence a study or test no longer has meaningful results.
Your right! If a woman gives a man a pat on the butt and the man complains in 99% of all cases nothing will happen. If that man even looks at a woman with subjective eyes then he can be fired or suspended from work. Women have been able to create a system where men can't even look at them subjectively but they can do almost anything and get away with it.
I never said anything about the Muslim world. Second of all if to vs too causes you hardship reading then that is your own issue.
If a woman makes her self all "sexy" or "hot" then she is misconducting herself. If I enter a work place and I have to deal with beautiful women who doll themselves up then I'm put in a situation where my body is being played with even though I might never act. Face it, the second a woman enters the work place dressed up any more then she needs to be she is misconducting herself.
In the same right, if I dress myself up, if I put my self in a state where I know I'm playing with the females around me I'm misconducting myself. I highly doubt this study took into account the fact then women make themselves look good on purpose and in doing so they have misconducted themselves because they want a reaction, which they achieve.
Any woman who wears a shirt which is to tight, to showing, to low. A skirt which is to short, to tight. If she wears make up or is hot, is just as guilty as any man. So well you can believe that lie it's not entirely true.
I would say make a loose standard, Only include major visual aspects such as brackets or control blocks. Make sure you comment the code very well so it's useful. The main issue I have when I have to look at other peoples code is mainly the fact that 99% of the world can't write a good comment that has any use. I think comments are the most mistreated and misunderstand concept in programming. I'm going to completely disagree with every programming book, prof and professional developer out there! A good comment needs to explain what you were thinking and why you thought it and how it works, anything else is not effective. For instance, this is from my working code
/* loops forever looking to see if a message queue exists,
* looping every 10 seconds to see if it exists
* if it does it continues in the program,
* otherwise it loops forever */
This is an example of how to write an effective comment that explains what's going on, how the structure works and why it works the way it does, most code I've seen wont even put that comment there, leaving a new team member to have to look at it for a period of time longer then needed to figure it out. I also think people don't comment enough, a comment should be at any line that isn't simple enough where a non coder can sit down and figure it out with in a few seconds.
So in my opion, focus on making effective and good comments, not a ton of code structure, formatting, characters in a line, editor to use etc... etc... etc... and NEVER include spelling. Any developer who gets mad at a spelling mistake shouldn't code, a spelling mistake that doesn't break the code doesn't matter. Spelling errors matter in documentation and legal defence not code. Also overall have fun, I find alot of standards have no fun in them, locking a standard into a military strict format just takes the fun out of coding, having to worry about every little thing with no freedom doesn't help to create an effective coding enviroment.
I don't think I'm better then those who willingly serve, I know I'm.
If you want to willingly serve go ahead but don't complain at all if you get hurt and don't let you family complain if you get killed, that's what you accept happening by going into the military, hence you want to get hurt and that to me sounds like serious mental illness, not rational.
To troll you have to be wrong or want to cause a situation where you needlessly make people argue with you because your being a shit head. My original point is that the government doesn't care about solders and until someone can prove me wrong I haven't trolled anything. I have never heard of a solder who came back and got the treatment they deserved. If the government really cared they would treat a returning solder like the second coming of god and not a homeless man with no medical insurance.
If I'm not willing to project how I feel then I either don't feel that way or I don't know how I feel, in either case I wouldn't have a point. When someone can show me a war where no one dies ( without using Star Trek ), then I'll finally support the military, until then I see the military and war as nothing but a mass killing.
So every solder gets a gold carpet treatment? Every solder that dies get tried like queen of england getting married? Does a solder get life time medical benefits that no one argues or even doubts? My point is that the governement doesn't remotely give a care in the world about a solder. We hear more about ( at least in Canada ), Kate having a baby or the deal at Macdonalds then we do about a solder. I don't support war, solders, militaries or war efforts but looking past that, we care more about everything else then we do about the people who "defend" our freedom.
Funny story is that a country doesn't need a military. The massive secret no one seems to have figured out is that you just don't piss everyone else off and no one attacks you. A military is the bully's friend, after the bully gets suspended the friend come in to "fix" the reason the bully got suspended. A military is no different, the leader of a country orders an attack and when that fails or when a little slap back happens they feel the need to act like the boss and just go full force. The only point of the military is to pointlessly kill people, a solder is just the name of a human who can murder legally. Hence when a solder gets injured or suffers pain it's really a very funny situation.
I don't think I'm better then those who willingly serve, I know I'm. I have a purpose in life, I have potential, I have a life I want to live. I don't need to be killed because the leader of my country wants to act like a 5 year old playing with army men. To all the men and women who served from Canada and the US in Iraq, it was a great example of natural selection. Those who have purpose and dignity don't need to try and prove it on the battlefield, we do that without needlessly and pointlessly risking our lives.
If your so F'd up that you think going to War or even joining the military is a good idea then you deserve to have mental health problems set in. What the country wants to do is give you a number and tell you that your life is worth as much as gum on there shoe. They don't care if you die, if you get injured, if you live or even if you make your country look good. They want to use you as a means to an end and they really don't care. Take responsibility for your own life and tell your government to F off, If you really care about your life then don't join the military, go to school, get a job and really show what you can do when your not just a number.
The issue isn't how many computers have moved over, the issue how many computers haven't. It takes one old computer on the backbone of a network that everyone forgot about to cause the issue. Sure all the production and mainstream systems will or should have protection setup to deal with it, but in the midst of all of that there will be the one program or the one computer that can't be converted and when time overflows that computer / program will cause all hell world wide to fall out.
Also there is alot of system that can't be touched, many embedded systems wont / can't understand 64 bit data types or even 32 bit data types, so well they can start to port time over to a 64 bit storage container, it won't matter because not everything can go 64 bit.
Unlike all the "big problems" in the world today, this one is real! I don't care about Kate having a baby or prince Harry smoked pot with Justin Beaver well Kim Celebrities is having an affair. This is actually a very real and important issue, yet how many people outside of the "nerd" community even know it exists. When the puck drops and Unix time overflows, I can promise you that all of a sudden what Kate's child is going to wear to her wedding is all of a sudden the least important headline in the papers.
Why is this funny? I just finished my second degree and I can say with a total degree of certainty that the only good code I get to see from day to day is either from my Embedded Software Developers or from Software Developers who use C or ASM.
To make a good password just don't think about it . Don't use anything that you would have to remember or figure out, type something random into the password box, copy the password and then remember it.
If I walked into a server room and saw Windows installed on any system that didn't 100% require it, I would tell the admin to change them over to Linux or get the hell out of the company.
Windows is typically perceived as cheaper as the cost of maintenance is generally lower; the long term cost of a server is power and maintenance. There are far more engineers supporting Windows than Linux, and consequently the theory of supply & demand would suggest lower cost Windows support.
Your assumption is wrong, Windows does not come off as cheaper in anyway when compared to the cost of supporting a well designed Linux system. A good Linux admin will outperform a Windows admin every day of the week and at the same time complete most jobs with time left over. If you compare costs you have to pay thousands for a set of Windows Server license packs, with Linux you download it, hire a qualified IT staff and your off and running. If I sat down with an IT staff and they tired to tell me that Linux would be a harder road to travel and cost us more money with Risk / Cost, well I wouldn't have that same staff for much longer. I've done support for many large and small company's and with out exception Linux has always been the cheaper option.
That would make sense, the education sector rarely does what is smart. Windows + Anything will never match the same setup as Linux + Anything. Windows does not deliver the same amount of performance when compared to a properly set up Linux system.
Slashdot Mirror
Ya ...... I love seeing responses which contain NONE of the points I mentioned. I don't even understand your point because it's based off what you didn't read and couldn't assume. I"m literally amazed you pulled that reply out of no where.
You have a valid point, how ever it was an example. The point is if a woman did touch a man I highly doubt anything would happen even if the man complained. I'm not going to blame chemicals or nature I'm just commenting on the fact of the matter.
The first post
Any woman who wears a shirt which is to tight, to showing, to low. A skirt which is to short, to tight. If she wears make up or is hot, is just as guilty as any man. So well you can believe that lie it's not entirely true.
I never mention myself or hint that I'm talking about myself or even hint at any relation to me or me not having a girl friend. The entire direction of the post would state that in general any woman who does that is as guilty as any man.
Second Post
I never said anything about the Muslim world. Second of all if to vs too causes you hardship reading then that is your own issue.
If a woman makes her self all "sexy" or "hot" then she is misconducting herself. If I enter a work place and I have to deal with beautiful women who doll themselves up then I'm put in a situation where my body is being played with even though I might never act. Face it, the second a woman enters the work place dressed up any more then she needs to be she is misconducting herself.
In the same right, if I dress myself up, if I put my self in a state where I know I'm playing with the females around me I'm misconducting myself. I highly doubt this study took into account the fact then women make themselves look good on purpose and in doing so they have misconducted themselves because they want a reaction, which they achieve.
Again I never mention myself directly, I use the term "I" to mean any man which is clear to anyone who can understand simple English. Clearly what is meant to be implied by the post is that I'm not targeting the Muslim culture and that any woman who dresses up or any man who dresses up is causing misconduct. The post really if read correctly is very general in use of terms and very general in overall concepts.
Third Post
The post had nothing to do with not having a girl friend and in fact by your very response you seem to want to objectify women mentally, so by that very post your part of the issue. Everything must be on even playing field, the second you allow one side a handicap you are not longer comparing apples to apples and hence a study or test no longer has meaningful results.
Very clear that I've pointed out the last two posts didn't involve me and that the study isn't realistic because it's not testing all the angles. I mention myself once but only to clear up the fact that you somehow gained a false understanding that I didn't have a girl friend.
Amazing attempt at learning to read but you didn't really get the point I guess.
The post had nothing to do with not having a girl friend and in fact by your very response you seem to want to objectify women mentally, so by that very post your part of the issue. Everything must be on even playing field, the second you allow one side a handicap you are not longer comparing apples to apples and hence a study or test no longer has meaningful results.
.... I never mentioned religion, but good job extracting meaning.
Your right! If a woman gives a man a pat on the butt and the man complains in 99% of all cases nothing will happen. If that man even looks at a woman with subjective eyes then he can be fired or suspended from work. Women have been able to create a system where men can't even look at them subjectively but they can do almost anything and get away with it.
I never said anything about the Muslim world. Second of all if to vs too causes you hardship reading then that is your own issue.
If a woman makes her self all "sexy" or "hot" then she is misconducting herself. If I enter a work place and I have to deal with beautiful women who doll themselves up then I'm put in a situation where my body is being played with even though I might never act. Face it, the second a woman enters the work place dressed up any more then she needs to be she is misconducting herself.
In the same right, if I dress myself up, if I put my self in a state where I know I'm playing with the females around me I'm misconducting myself. I highly doubt this study took into account the fact then women make themselves look good on purpose and in doing so they have misconducted themselves because they want a reaction, which they achieve.
Any woman who wears a shirt which is to tight, to showing, to low. A skirt which is to short, to tight. If she wears make up or is hot, is just as guilty as any man. So well you can believe that lie it's not entirely true.
When you figure it out come back and tell me and I'll give you a gold star
/* loops forever looking to see if a message queue exists,
* looping every 10 seconds to see if it exists
* if it does it continues in the program,
* otherwise it loops forever */
This is an example of how to write an effective comment that explains what's going on, how the structure works and why it works the way it does, most code I've seen wont even put that comment there, leaving a new team member to have to look at it for a period of time longer then needed to figure it out. I also think people don't comment enough, a comment should be at any line that isn't simple enough where a non coder can sit down and figure it out with in a few seconds.
So in my opion, focus on making effective and good comments, not a ton of code structure, formatting, characters in a line, editor to use etc... etc... etc... and NEVER include spelling. Any developer who gets mad at a spelling mistake shouldn't code, a spelling mistake that doesn't break the code doesn't matter. Spelling errors matter in documentation and legal defence not code. Also overall have fun, I find alot of standards have no fun in them, locking a standard into a military strict format just takes the fun out of coding, having to worry about every little thing with no freedom doesn't help to create an effective coding enviroment.
Find me a large undiscovered section of the Earth that has people living in it and I'll agree with you.
I don't think I'm better then those who willingly serve, I know I'm.
If you want to willingly serve go ahead but don't complain at all if you get hurt and don't let you family complain if you get killed, that's what you accept happening by going into the military, hence you want to get hurt and that to me sounds like serious mental illness, not rational.
To troll you have to be wrong or want to cause a situation where you needlessly make people argue with you because your being a shit head. My original point is that the government doesn't care about solders and until someone can prove me wrong I haven't trolled anything. I have never heard of a solder who came back and got the treatment they deserved. If the government really cared they would treat a returning solder like the second coming of god and not a homeless man with no medical insurance.
But if you didn't piss them off why are they coming in.........
If I'm not willing to project how I feel then I either don't feel that way or I don't know how I feel, in either case I wouldn't have a point. When someone can show me a war where no one dies ( without using Star Trek ), then I'll finally support the military, until then I see the military and war as nothing but a mass killing.
So every solder gets a gold carpet treatment? Every solder that dies get tried like queen of england getting married? Does a solder get life time medical benefits that no one argues or even doubts? My point is that the governement doesn't remotely give a care in the world about a solder. We hear more about ( at least in Canada ), Kate having a baby or the deal at Macdonalds then we do about a solder. I don't support war, solders, militaries or war efforts but looking past that, we care more about everything else then we do about the people who "defend" our freedom.
Funny story is that a country doesn't need a military. The massive secret no one seems to have figured out is that you just don't piss everyone else off and no one attacks you. A military is the bully's friend, after the bully gets suspended the friend come in to "fix" the reason the bully got suspended. A military is no different, the leader of a country orders an attack and when that fails or when a little slap back happens they feel the need to act like the boss and just go full force. The only point of the military is to pointlessly kill people, a solder is just the name of a human who can murder legally. Hence when a solder gets injured or suffers pain it's really a very funny situation.
I don't think I'm better then those who willingly serve, I know I'm. I have a purpose in life, I have potential, I have a life I want to live. I don't need to be killed because the leader of my country wants to act like a 5 year old playing with army men. To all the men and women who served from Canada and the US in Iraq, it was a great example of natural selection. Those who have purpose and dignity don't need to try and prove it on the battlefield, we do that without needlessly and pointlessly risking our lives.
If your so F'd up that you think going to War or even joining the military is a good idea then you deserve to have mental health problems set in. What the country wants to do is give you a number and tell you that your life is worth as much as gum on there shoe. They don't care if you die, if you get injured, if you live or even if you make your country look good. They want to use you as a means to an end and they really don't care. Take responsibility for your own life and tell your government to F off, If you really care about your life then don't join the military, go to school, get a job and really show what you can do when your not just a number.
The issue isn't how many computers have moved over, the issue how many computers haven't. It takes one old computer on the backbone of a network that everyone forgot about to cause the issue. Sure all the production and mainstream systems will or should have protection setup to deal with it, but in the midst of all of that there will be the one program or the one computer that can't be converted and when time overflows that computer / program will cause all hell world wide to fall out.
Also there is alot of system that can't be touched, many embedded systems wont / can't understand 64 bit data types or even 32 bit data types, so well they can start to port time over to a 64 bit storage container, it won't matter because not everything can go 64 bit.
Unlike all the "big problems" in the world today, this one is real! I don't care about Kate having a baby or prince Harry smoked pot with Justin Beaver well Kim Celebrities is having an affair. This is actually a very real and important issue, yet how many people outside of the "nerd" community even know it exists. When the puck drops and Unix time overflows, I can promise you that all of a sudden what Kate's child is going to wear to her wedding is all of a sudden the least important headline in the papers.
Why is this funny? I just finished my second degree and I can say with a total degree of certainty that the only good code I get to see from day to day is either from my Embedded Software Developers or from Software Developers who use C or ASM.
To make a good password just don't think about it . Don't use anything that you would have to remember or figure out, type something random into the password box, copy the password and then remember it.
If I walked into a server room and saw Windows installed on any system that didn't 100% require it, I would tell the admin to change them over to Linux or get the hell out of the company.
Windows is typically perceived as cheaper as the cost of maintenance is generally lower; the long term cost of a server is power and maintenance. There are far more engineers supporting Windows than Linux, and consequently the theory of supply & demand would suggest lower cost Windows support.
Your assumption is wrong, Windows does not come off as cheaper in anyway when compared to the cost of supporting a well designed Linux system. A good Linux admin will outperform a Windows admin every day of the week and at the same time complete most jobs with time left over. If you compare costs you have to pay thousands for a set of Windows Server license packs, with Linux you download it, hire a qualified IT staff and your off and running. If I sat down with an IT staff and they tired to tell me that Linux would be a harder road to travel and cost us more money with Risk / Cost, well I wouldn't have that same staff for much longer. I've done support for many large and small company's and with out exception Linux has always been the cheaper option.
That would make sense, the education sector rarely does what is smart. Windows + Anything will never match the same setup as Linux + Anything. Windows does not deliver the same amount of performance when compared to a properly set up Linux system.