Slashdot Mirror


User: mobilinux

mobilinux's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11

  1. Re:KIsmet saves the day on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    I will keep you updated. It is not receive only.
    I found that it would be much cheaper to build
    a special purpose antenna to overcome the requirements of a power amplifier apart from
    increasing the penetration into homes with lot
    of brick masonry.

  2. Re:KIsmet saves the day on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    It should not be a big deal to design one for
    detecting ISM band emissions but will be a bit
    tricky due to the DSS modulation scheme which
    tend to scatter the available energy over the
    entire band. I do not think that there is any
    receiver that employs pure passive tuning(which
    is a theoretical possibility and limited by the
    availability of high Q resonators and narrow band
    tunable very low noise amplifiers).

  3. Re:KIsmet saves the day on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    I am in the process of building one (stacked and phased collinear antenna) using inexpensive
    materials, for an would be secure community
    network. If you are interested let me know.

  4. Re:KIsmet saves the day on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    You don't really need an omni directional antenna,
    you could always use a switched parabolic antenna,
    or even a rotating one. We are talking about ability to identify a potential listener and not
    talking about some rf glitch caused by a solar flare!.

  5. Re:Not necessarily possible? on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    If you are thinking of using an yet another el-cheapo card as a detector for the local oscillator emission it may not work. If you
    ever knew about how a receiver works(direct
    conversion,superhet etc) you will understand
    what I mean. You do need dedicated h/w for
    doing it. Also you should remember there is
    no limit on the receiver antenna gain by FCC.
    With the current advances in DSP, RF device
    technologies, electronically controlled phased array antennas and liquid nitrogen cooled rf lna's, nothing is impossible. I could build you
    one, if you could pay me $$$$$ even out of off
    the shelf components!.

  6. Re:KIsmet saves the day on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is still possible to detect a client in RFMON
    mode by using a very high gain antenna combined
    with some DSP to identify a possible listening
    of a 802.11 receiver since there is no FCC regulation for a receiving antenna gain:)

  7. Re:securing on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    you could use mac address filtering and all other
    provisions of security(such as 128Bit WEP with
    shared authentication only) and use IPSEC to
    encrypt the entire traffic. If not you could
    just create an ssh tunnel. Time to get a linux
    tablet PC?

  8. Re:Not necessarily possible? on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    Actually the zapping could be made much
    easier if you could use additional high
    gain receivers(or switch a single receiver
    between multiple antennas) to locate the
    intruder by triangulation and immediately
    activate a focussed beam of high energy RF
    (high gain electronically controlled phased
    array Antenna?) to cripple the receiver
    without impairing ongoing sessions with
    other authorized clients.

  9. Re:Not necessarily possible? on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention that once you've identified
    a rogue receiver, you could then stop the transmission in the particular transmission or
    just transmit false data. It would be even better
    if you could start switching the WEP keys in sync
    with the legitimate clients (or) encrypt the traffic on the fly. If not you can also think
    of sending a shutdown signal to legitimate clients
    and then zap a high energy RF pulse to the direction of maximum signal strength to burn out
    the frontend of the rogue client, it would then
    become easy to spot the intruder visually with
    the smoking card!. Then continue regular transmission once the offending oscillator signal
    is absent.

  10. Re:Not necessarily possible? on Detecting 802.11 Discovery Apps · · Score: 1

    What about a high gain receive antenna hooked
    up to a highly sensitive RF receiver trying to
    identify local oscilltor emissions out of the
    listening client card. In simple terms, what
    about a detector similar to "radar detector detector"? Also any RF_MON mode client card
    is going to be actively scanning the different
    channels(leading to differing oscilltor frequencies). If you know your legitimate clients are not operating in that channel, and if you have a really focused antenna, you could even catch the intruder by moving the antenna for max signal strength of the oscillator emission.

  11. Re:New Tadpole SPARCbook RSN on New Tadpole SPARCbook RSN · · Score: 1

    I feel most of the EDA(Electronic Design Automation) vendors would use it, since a lot
    of EDA software(esp. chip design s/w from
    Cadence, Synopsys etc.) run primarily on Solaris.
    I also see some web developers would find it
    convenient since there are significant solaris
    based web servers out there.