I personally feel certifications help in the job market when they are targeted or "fit" with where you are going. Anything that shows intent, ability or simple sticktoitiveness is worthwhile in my book... of course you have to be able tell your widgets from foo and bar.
I have interviewed grads, people with certificates and people with solely work experience. I think that people with certificates can be the best of both as they often times have experience, targeted training and they tend to be older with more real world experience.
It may be a good idea to have some materials with you upon interview that speak to the particular certificate or curriculum undertaken.
The most important piece is being able to monitor whats happening at the OS level to avoid trouble to start with. I have had results on my primarily Solaris network - with some AIX and Linux boxes also, using EnlightenDSM. Regarding failover and availablity, some cool stuff is the ablity to pool machines and setup rules that will actually move services to another machine if machine is unavailable.
http://www.enlightendsm.com/ is the url i think
Also look at the the Sun Management Console and its monitoring capabilities.
I believe that for any court to allow bail forfeiture and entry of a no contest/guilty plea in any "felony" proceeding without requiring a court appearance would violate rights to due process and representation. At the very least it opens the court to the appearance of violations. Alot of court procedures are in place purposefully to document and certify that constitutional protections were in place for defendants. For example, if you were to simply plead by mail to a felony proceeding, how does the court really know you are you? How do they know you understood the nature of the charges against you? How do they know you recieved adequate legal advice? How do they know you were not intimidated and threatened by the police to plead guilty? These are all things they ascertain in court proceedings that arraign, process, try and dispose of cases. Every state is free to institute their own legal codes, however they all must be able to withstand constitutional law tests and that gives booking, arrest, accusatory and case proceedings some similarities across the country. In California misdemeanors and above require booking - which is the immediate detention and identification of the accused along with a formal notice of filed charges. There are certain exceptions where booking can be done "in the field" however and certain traffic offenses qualify. Most traffic offenses are "infractions" however. In no case ever of any felony charge will booking be done in the field or the person not be immediately detained, identified and notified of the charges against them. In fact, arraignment is generally required within 72 hours of felony charges. Additionally, to justify the felony arrest, the officer is required to file an affadavit with the court stating the reasons the felony arrest was required absent a formal arrest warrant by a judge. That is not to say that an officer cannot take information, move the case to the district atty who then reviews and determines whether charges should be pursued. If charges are pursued, the DA goes to the court and gets an arrest warrant. How do I know these things? Ten years of experience working in court, pretrial services and booking facilities in California - in a county that had 75-100,000 booking per year.
There is no arguement as to the "legality" of the governments position. They own the network and the equipment as has been stated... they also own the information and wrote the laws.
No one, least of all me, likes the government or the employer looking over your shoulder... but when the government is the employer and you are using government resources time and bandwidth... its better to use the resources, time and bandwidth for the reasons you are there in the first place.
If you bring home a dog that bites you can't complain when it bites... Your acceptance of the condition is contributory to your condition.
Slashdot Mirror
As I recall from McKusicks book... the design of 4.4, NeXT stemmed from BSD 4.2, not 4.4. Of which most significantly different was VM management.
I don't believe NeXT and subsequent evolutions rejoined the 4.4 tree
I use a NeXT running OpenStep 4.2 and it does not use BSD style VM.
Just my few cents...
I personally feel certifications help in the job market when they are targeted or "fit" with where you are going. Anything that shows intent, ability or simple sticktoitiveness is worthwhile in my book... of course you have to be able tell your widgets from foo and bar.
I have interviewed grads, people with certificates and people with solely work experience. I think that people with certificates can be the best of both as they often times have experience, targeted training and they tend to be older with more real world experience.
It may be a good idea to have some materials with you upon interview that speak to the particular certificate or curriculum undertaken.
The most important piece is being able to monitor whats happening at the OS level to avoid trouble to start with. I have had results on my primarily Solaris network - with some AIX and Linux boxes also, using EnlightenDSM. Regarding failover and availablity, some cool stuff is the ablity to pool machines and setup rules that will actually move services to another machine if machine is unavailable.
http://www.enlightendsm.com/ is the url i think
Also look at the the Sun Management Console and its monitoring capabilities.
The point of the statute is the evasion of arrest. Speeding is the means by which the crime is being committed, not the crime itself here.
I know that North Carolina can be a tough on lawbreakers but this doesn't seem out of line.
I believe that for any court to allow bail forfeiture and entry of a no contest/guilty plea in any "felony" proceeding without requiring a court appearance would violate rights to due process and representation. At the very least it opens the court to the appearance of violations. Alot of court procedures are in place purposefully to document and certify that constitutional protections were in place for defendants. For example, if you were to simply plead by mail to a felony proceeding, how does the court really know you are you? How do they know you understood the nature of the charges against you? How do they know you recieved adequate legal advice? How do they know you were not intimidated and threatened by the police to plead guilty? These are all things they ascertain in court proceedings that arraign, process, try and dispose of cases. Every state is free to institute their own legal codes, however they all must be able to withstand constitutional law tests and that gives booking, arrest, accusatory and case proceedings some similarities across the country. In California misdemeanors and above require booking - which is the immediate detention and identification of the accused along with a formal notice of filed charges. There are certain exceptions where booking can be done "in the field" however and certain traffic offenses qualify. Most traffic offenses are "infractions" however. In no case ever of any felony charge will booking be done in the field or the person not be immediately detained, identified and notified of the charges against them. In fact, arraignment is generally required within 72 hours of felony charges. Additionally, to justify the felony arrest, the officer is required to file an affadavit with the court stating the reasons the felony arrest was required absent a formal arrest warrant by a judge. That is not to say that an officer cannot take information, move the case to the district atty who then reviews and determines whether charges should be pursued. If charges are pursued, the DA goes to the court and gets an arrest warrant. How do I know these things? Ten years of experience working in court, pretrial services and booking facilities in California - in a county that had 75-100,000 booking per year.
There is no arguement as to the "legality" of the governments position. They own the network and the equipment as has been stated... they also own the information and wrote the laws.
No one, least of all me, likes the government or the employer looking over your shoulder... but when the government is the employer and you are using government resources time and bandwidth... its better to use the resources, time and bandwidth for the reasons you are there in the first place.
If you bring home a dog that bites you can't complain when it bites... Your acceptance of the condition is contributory to your condition.