While it is probably good for the market is we get rid of microsoft, the idea is create freedom for the users by having a good standard that not just one company controls, but is controlled by most, if not all.
I only think the list is a bit longer in this case something like: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they try to embrace you, then they try to extend you, then you win, profit (ok last one for the slashdot-crowd)
Actually it's probably worse for IPv6, because these attacks are about using up resource in the kernel and ipv6 uses more resources (bigger addresses for a start)
I think they want to prevent running programs that have had a some kind of overflow and there 'code rewritten' to be able to do things they were never intended to do. And by using source-code analysis this might be an easier way to construct a lot of a program is allowed to do.
In mean in the way it works, I didn't mention anything else.
I don't buy from vendors where the drivers are not in mainline or are atleast actively working towards that goal. Otherwise, yes you will get those problems, so don't.
Also I think the share of Linux-boxes in public places (webservers) is probably larger. Solaris boxes are mostly behind the firewall. Heck the firewall could even be running Linux.
Just set up a redirect from example.com to www.example.com and never change that. You can move www.example.com around any way you want. It also works better with google indexing.
While it is probably good for the market is we get rid of microsoft, the idea is create freedom for the users by having a good standard that not just one company controls, but is controlled by most, if not all.
I only think the list is a bit longer in this case something like: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they try to embrace you, then they try to extend you, then you win, profit (ok last one for the slashdot-crowd)
SMB, Kerberos, LDAP
And IE 5.5 is still the least buggy in the line of IE5, IE5.5, IE6 and IE7. And IE8, well we're not really certain yet.
And now we also have other common protocols, IP and IPv6. And I don't think there is a big problem people not adopting common protocols.
'Funny' how they always have there own standard(s)
That sucks
And they still do. :-)
Yeah, yeah, -10 redundant.
And here is de 'evidence': http://xkcd.com/224/
Actually it's probably worse for IPv6, because these attacks are about using up resource in the kernel and ipv6 uses more resources (bigger addresses for a start)
I think they want to prevent running programs that have had a some kind of overflow and there 'code rewritten' to be able to do things they were never intended to do. And by using source-code analysis this might be an easier way to construct a lot of a program is allowed to do.
Also the BSD's have something similair I've heared (and forgot the same)
It's really easy to bypass a provider, use an other ! And that's exactly why I think this doesn't work.
After buying a condo, I heared in my old neighborhood they will start running 100 Mb/s fiber. I'm now I'm "stuck" on 12 Mb/s (1.5 up)
In mean in the way it works, I didn't mention anything else.
I don't buy from vendors where the drivers are not in mainline or are atleast actively working towards that goal. Otherwise, yes you will get those problems, so don't.
Also I think the share of Linux-boxes in public places (webservers) is probably larger. Solaris boxes are mostly behind the firewall. Heck the firewall could even be running Linux.
Zones are like Linux-vserver which in Debian is just an apt-get away
You cant do the same with RedHat.
It's the reason CentOS exists.
AMD is supposed to support virtualization of I/O on their processors, but I've not seen any implementation of it.
I guess we will agree to disagree
It's not nifty to split authoritative and recursive, it's sane (security).
Just set up a redirect from example.com to www.example.com and never change that. You can move www.example.com around any way you want. It also works better with google indexing.
I wouldn't mind helping or the company I work at (the last would be for pay, maybe the first one as well).
Have a look at RFC3964
A lot of businesses use static/public IP's