Which has nothing to do with SSH, you need to use -no-remote if you want to use of different profiles at the same time with Firefox.
-no-remote isn't a very good and clean name for it. But I think it came from Unix/Linux where it was used in the same with XMMS (Can I say WinAMP-like MP3-player ?). Where remote refers to talking to the existing running application and have it opening URLs, playlists and whatever with it or the alternative: start a new XMMS or browser-session/application every single time you run the command.
Why you would want to use a plug-in for Adobe Acrobat is something I've never understood.
PDF and Java are the main malware attack vectors at the moment on websites. I would not use the plugin, don't automatically load what is on the page. Only open the PDF's you actually want to read.
The first thing I do after each new Acrobat releases is to disable the plugin.
That reminds me, I should look if there is a more general way to block it.
You are right, it isn't the version numbers. What they do now have is a more rapid release cycle. But also they don't have security updates for Firefox 4 after the release of Firefox 5.
I've been using it for years. Although you pretty much need be a webdeveloper if you don't enable the pre-configured whitelist to know what and what not to enable.
Because you'd need a pretty big disaster to destroy the earth.
And if there is no planet, who cares ? I mean we'll probably not survive either.
Anything which can 'destroy' the Internet is probably so big an advancement in technology that the Internet became useless or the above mentioned disaster and then not much survived either.
So if the solution is to create a version of Windows which doesn't allow you to install any applications, kinda like the walled garden that Apple iOS is, then the solution isn't really killing the botnet, just making it irrelevant.
I'm surprised the botnet makers haven't gotten rid of the central command&control systems. There has to be some botnet builders that can pay some smart russian to come up with code for that.
Some P2P solution.
Maybe this is because of NAT ? They don't have a simple way of connecting to every node because of it.
Slashdot Mirror
HTML5 isn't a standard yet. This is all new things. If you need stability, stick with the older standards for a while. And nothing will break.
A real standard is something which is widely used.
So that is what big companies should use. The HTML4/CSS2/JS which is already out, what they've been using for quiet a while now.
Wait a bit before the other things are widely used if you want/need stability.
I think what they mean is:
If the big corporations stick to using browser-/webpage-features which are actual standards their code won't break.
That means real standards: Things that are done, ready and _stable_.
Not some new, shiny HTML5-/CSS3-effect.
Which has nothing to do with SSH, you need to use -no-remote if you want to use of different profiles at the same time with Firefox.
-no-remote isn't a very good and clean name for it. But I think it came from Unix/Linux where it was used in the same with XMMS (Can I say WinAMP-like MP3-player ?). Where remote refers to talking to the existing running application and have it opening URLs, playlists and whatever with it or the alternative: start a new XMMS or browser-session/application every single time you run the command.
How do you test for Chrome ? How many updates does it get ? daily ?
No, really, I want to know.
Why you would want to use a plug-in for Adobe Acrobat is something I've never understood.
PDF and Java are the main malware attack vectors at the moment on websites. I would not use the plugin, don't automatically load what is on the page. Only open the PDF's you actually want to read.
The first thing I do after each new Acrobat releases is to disable the plugin.
That reminds me, I should look if there is a more general way to block it.
Ohh, there is a really simple answer to your comment:
Then why if you want/need stable do you target the newer technologies ?
Which is the whole point.
Don't aim for one or a few browsers, aim for standards.
You don't have to wipe the old profile, just create a new profile and try that first and see if the problem remains.
You are right, it isn't the version numbers. What they do now have is a more rapid release cycle. But also they don't have security updates for Firefox 4 after the release of Firefox 5.
Why would I be ?
I do however have no idea why people use it.
But other people obviously found a use for it.
Maybe I just don't see it as I'm in Europe. I know it's really, really big in the US.
Its probably better to give all investors and employees their money and kill the whole Facebook project. No one likes their privacy policies anyway.
Actually, if I understand it correctly he worked on Postgres, not PostgreSQL which came later.
You don't need to be firefoxless, pretty much anyone can install it. There is even a version for OS/2
EULA's are pretty much illegal anyway, atleast in my country.
I've been using it for years. Although you pretty much need be a webdeveloper if you don't enable the pre-configured whitelist to know what and what not to enable.
Look up Evercookie, I'm sure it still has some techniques that still work.
How about E-Tag. I don't think any tracking company uses that right now, but it could be.
Is the Internet indestructible ? Or the planet ?
Well, in a way yes.
Because you'd need a pretty big disaster to destroy the earth.
And if there is no planet, who cares ? I mean we'll probably not survive either.
Anything which can 'destroy' the Internet is probably so big an advancement in technology that the Internet became useless or the above mentioned disaster and then not much survived either.
So if the solution is to create a version of Windows which doesn't allow you to install any applications, kinda like the walled garden that Apple iOS is, then the solution isn't really killing the botnet, just making it irrelevant.
I'm surprised the botnet makers haven't gotten rid of the central command&control systems. There has to be some botnet builders that can pay some smart russian to come up with code for that.
Some P2P solution.
Maybe this is because of NAT ? They don't have a simple way of connecting to every node because of it.
Interresting how people think it is that simple, but agriculture is actually a big industry in the US, even when compared to the rest of the world.
Although you could make a point about how it is very mechanicalized now, so atleast it is industrialized.
It depends.
The rates fluctuate, sometimes wildly.
That is one of the reasons many just use hybrid apps with webtechnologies and use HTML5-offline-cache.
You don't update the app, just the part of the app that matters. And the developer decides when the update happends.
easy peasy
Verifiable != public
You are funny. :-)
Someone will always have access to it.
I don't really know much about .tk domains, what is the problem ?
The original owner, Bob Parsons, is also staying. He is now the business manager, so not much should change.