Yes, of course, it is legal, it is a form of political association and expression protected by the First Amendment. No state even tried to make vote-pairing or 'vote-trading' illegal in 2000 and none of the tens of thousands of people who did it were ever prosecuted for anything.
The reason people wonder about this is that six Republican state secretaries of state, led by California's Bill Jones, tried to shut down the movement in 2000 by claiming that vote-trading is a form of vote-buying and selling. This is absurd since nothing of material value ever changes hands. Yet, facing a series of hysterical criminal prosecution threats from these partisan officials, some website operators reluctantly shut their sites down--which almost certainly affected the outcome of the election.
The ACLU and the National Voting Rights Institute, assisted by Harvard Law Professors Laurence Tribe and Alan Dershowitz and American University Law Professor Jamin Raskin, promptly brought a free speech lawsuit seeking relief in California. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in the plaintiff's favor; we now await a final judgement in this case, Porter v. Jones, which you can examine at the ACLU website.
Meantime, the new California Secretary of State has publicly announced that he does not consider vote-trading to be a form of vote-buying and selling or otherwise illegal. We have a phalanx of constitutional lawyers and law professors, in addition to the ACLU, prepared to fight off any new partisan attempts in other states to curb our political speech rights or destroy our coalition. For further legal and historical analysis, see Jamin Raskin's book, Overruling Democracy pp.47-56 and Marc Randazza's law review articles: The Other Election Controversy of Y2K.
Check out this site that is trying to match up Nader and Gore voters!
5% of the popular vote for Ralph Nader.
4 years in the White House for Al Gore.
We can have it all with WinWin!
United, we can protect the environment, the Supreme Court, and working
families from a Bush presidency--and promote the visibility of Ralph Nader's
platform.
Visit our web site at winwincampaign.org and see how you can vote
effectively in this election.
There are alot of nonprofit organizations needing technical assistance. If anyone ever feels the need (and you should) to help others, there are many groups that can help direct your skills to help nonprofit groups tackle their use of technology to help their work. A great group you should check out is http://www.netcorps.org. They are recruiting students to help with nonprofit technical assistance. These students not only learn more about technology, but they learn how to work with people, develop projects and other real world skills.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, of course, it is legal, it is a form of political association and expression protected by the First Amendment. No state even tried to make vote-pairing or 'vote-trading' illegal in 2000 and none of the tens of thousands of people who did it were ever prosecuted for anything.
The reason people wonder about this is that six Republican state secretaries of state, led by California's Bill Jones, tried to shut down the movement in 2000 by claiming that vote-trading is a form of vote-buying and selling. This is absurd since nothing of material value ever changes hands. Yet, facing a series of hysterical criminal prosecution threats from these partisan officials, some website operators reluctantly shut their sites down--which almost certainly affected the outcome of the election.
The ACLU and the National Voting Rights Institute, assisted by Harvard Law Professors Laurence Tribe and Alan Dershowitz and American University Law Professor Jamin Raskin, promptly brought a free speech lawsuit seeking relief in California. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in the plaintiff's favor; we now await a final judgement in this case, Porter v. Jones, which you can examine at the ACLU website.
Meantime, the new California Secretary of State has publicly announced that he does not consider vote-trading to be a form of vote-buying and selling or otherwise illegal. We have a phalanx of constitutional lawyers and law professors, in addition to the ACLU, prepared to fight off any new partisan attempts in other states to curb our political speech rights or destroy our coalition. For further legal and historical analysis, see Jamin Raskin's book, Overruling Democracy pp.47-56 and Marc Randazza's law review articles: The Other Election Controversy of Y2K.
Check out: http://www.votepair.org/faq.php#legal
check out winwincampaign.org
Check out this site that is trying to match up Nader and Gore voters! 5% of the popular vote for Ralph Nader. 4 years in the White House for Al Gore. We can have it all with WinWin! United, we can protect the environment, the Supreme Court, and working families from a Bush presidency--and promote the visibility of Ralph Nader's platform. Visit our web site at winwincampaign.org and see how you can vote effectively in this election.
There are alot of nonprofit organizations needing technical assistance. If anyone ever feels the need (and you should) to help others, there are many groups that can help direct your skills to help nonprofit groups tackle their use of technology to help their work. A great group you should check out is http://www.netcorps.org. They are recruiting students to help with nonprofit technical assistance. These students not only learn more about technology, but they learn how to work with people, develop projects and other real world skills.