He combined snapshots and motion blur of objects which were all in motion. I would qualify that as manipulation of our concept of time; our expectation as observers differs from the end result.
Except I suspect that unless he's several hundred years old, they probably "named him after the country" (ethnicity, whatever) rather than the other way around.
Since there is essentially ZERO market for his images,
He's an artist; doesn't art always have a market, at least theoretically? I could apparently paint an entire canvas red and sell it for a ton of money if I could find the right rich person and convince them that I'm a famous artist.
The GP was talking about the value of the camera, not the art it produces. How much he sells the art for is besides the point.
You're not listening. I've said that I don't necessarily believe they're harmful, but I acknowledge the strong chance that they're abusing the bureaucracy for their own profit by concealing relevant data. If GMOs make better foodstuffs, are more viable as crops, and are the same price or cheaper (to the consumer!), then fine. You seem to be refusing to admit that any of those 3 conditions could possibly be found false at any point in the future.
But I guess I'll just keep being skeptical and you'll keep calling me names. Good day, sir.
to which I'd say "So? If you live your life in such terror of not knowing who might be carrying a weapon and who might not be... not only are your priorities off, but you really need to see help with your anxiety issues".
You really have to be that confrontational and rude about it? Just because I don't go up to people with guns and poke them in the eye doesn't mean that I'm "living in terror" of them. And as a rule, I find anyone questioning my literacy or mental capacity offensive.
I didn't say I refused to believe it; I'm just skeptical of all studies these days, especially ones done by the same corporation that markets the thing being tested.
Considering that we keep finding studies that are full of shit, it's unreasonable for you to attack people who doubt studies.
I'm confused as to how much the headline actually relates to the article...
"Emmett Plant Talks About the Paper-Based RPG Game Business"
In the summary, the only bit that's anything "paper-based" is a reference to the guy DM'ing (presumably?) D&D at some point...which I'm not convinced would qualify him to speak on "the paper-based RPG game business." And he's starting a company to make RPGs...are they paper-based RPGs?
And the first sentence starts with telling us he's a *musical composer* and references an audio book, which is the exact opposite of a paper-based anything!
Rather afraid that if I read the article, this'll turn out to be Bennett Haselton's cousin or something.
Slashdot Mirror
I.e. push a different address onto the stack before you return, basically changing it to an unconditional jump?
At least now it's getting fixed. I'd call that better than not knowing about it.
"more secure" != "impenetrable"
Randomized data may not account for cases where the font has to be invalid in a particular way to trip the overflow.
He combined snapshots and motion blur of objects which were all in motion. I would qualify that as manipulation of our concept of time; our expectation as observers differs from the end result.
Except I suspect that unless he's several hundred years old, they probably "named him after the country" (ethnicity, whatever) rather than the other way around.
Damn time travelers fucking up everything...
Since there is essentially ZERO market for his images,
He's an artist; doesn't art always have a market, at least theoretically? I could apparently paint an entire canvas red and sell it for a ton of money if I could find the right rich person and convince them that I'm a famous artist.
The GP was talking about the value of the camera, not the art it produces. How much he sells the art for is besides the point.
You're not listening. I've said that I don't necessarily believe they're harmful, but I acknowledge the strong chance that they're abusing the bureaucracy for their own profit by concealing relevant data. If GMOs make better foodstuffs, are more viable as crops, and are the same price or cheaper (to the consumer!), then fine. You seem to be refusing to admit that any of those 3 conditions could possibly be found false at any point in the future.
But I guess I'll just keep being skeptical and you'll keep calling me names. Good day, sir.
They also got rid of the navy after the war, which caused problems with the French not long after.
to which I'd say "So? If you live your life in such terror of not knowing who might be carrying a weapon and who might not be... not only are your priorities off, but you really need to see help with your anxiety issues".
You really have to be that confrontational and rude about it? Just because I don't go up to people with guns and poke them in the eye doesn't mean that I'm "living in terror" of them. And as a rule, I find anyone questioning my literacy or mental capacity offensive.
Because it's not possible to design a perfect computer system? Not if you want it to be customizable, anyway; you'd have to store it in ROM.
So, do you also think that vaccines cause autism? There have been studies that show a link.
A good case in point of crap studies being published.
There's no backup beryllium sphere on board.
Way to go, you broke the ship!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kellogg%E2%80%93Briand_Pact
Note that it was signed in 1928.
By Germany.
Majority vs. Supermajority vs. Plurality; yes, that's a fun one :)
I didn't say I refused to believe it; I'm just skeptical of all studies these days, especially ones done by the same corporation that markets the thing being tested.
Considering that we keep finding studies that are full of shit, it's unreasonable for you to attack people who doubt studies.
I'm confused as to how much the headline actually relates to the article...
"Emmett Plant Talks About the Paper-Based RPG Game Business"
In the summary, the only bit that's anything "paper-based" is a reference to the guy DM'ing (presumably?) D&D at some point...which I'm not convinced would qualify him to speak on "the paper-based RPG game business." And he's starting a company to make RPGs...are they paper-based RPGs?
And the first sentence starts with telling us he's a *musical composer* and references an audio book, which is the exact opposite of a paper-based anything!
Rather afraid that if I read the article, this'll turn out to be Bennett Haselton's cousin or something.
True. Hence the "limited subset" which could be rather a better thing.
pintryst
Why does one of them have to be lying? Are they supposed to be describing the same person? I'm sure all those demographics actually exist.
If anything, he was apologizing for his subconscious biases, dude.
Interesting points.
Is there a reason you're spelling it "womyn"?
30-40 still fits the range in question. GP is still relevant.
Oh, this was just example data and not judgement. My apologies; carry on.
I wasn't aware we were discriminating against Torchwood fans now?