Slashdot Mirror


User: Rujiel

Rujiel's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
454
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 454

  1. Re: MORE DISINFORMATION on Leaked Documents Detail Al-Qaeda's Efforts To Fight Back Against Drones · · Score: 1

    Do you really think your quibbling with a sock puppet will convince anyone? We get it, he's the Alan Colmes "conspiratorial" weakling to your Sean Hannity. I forget if I've said this before, but I'll say it again: you're not good at this! Why don't you stop this nonsense and do something charitable rather than maligned for once? Give up your minimum wage psyops paycheck and put in time at a homeless shelter for awhile. Maybe then you'll sleep better.

    With compassion, -Rujiel

  2. Re: MORE DISINFORMATION on Leaked Documents Detail Al-Qaeda's Efforts To Fight Back Against Drones · · Score: 1

    If backwards day is a day on which you're getting paid to lie on forums and upvote yourself with other accounts, then yes, it is backwards day just as much as any other day. I did some googling and found user Anachragnome call you out on your tired fearmongering talking-points bullshit. Above you advocated drones with a single link: "Pakistani says drones are GREAT!".

    Al Qaeda is a convenient but phony composite made up of several groups either we or the Russians funded or trained at one time or another. Even Hillary Clinton admits to this openly--
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd0fLAbV1cA

    You're an establishment lapdog because you feign histrionics when it comes to acts of terror from Muslims and claim your primary concern is terrorism, but when the west murders thousands of children in un-surgical drone strikes, sells chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians, irradiates huge numbers of Iraqis with depleted uranium, or scolds Iraqi children with white phosphorous, it's all justified because the enemy of the day did it first, or would do it if they could. Even if you tried, you couldn't make it any more obvious that your only target is a matter of "who" rather than the "what".

    The reason you need your lame disclaimer signature is because almost anyone could tell you have a vested interest in trolling people here rather than spreading the truth--you make emotional arguments that don't even match the rest of your tone. Do you really think a bunch of nerds can't read between the lines? Because I don't know if you take pride at what you do, but you're not great at it--your tail is showing.

    You have no integrity, and if you're getting paid for this, your employer sorely needs new talent. Hang yourself.

  3. Re: MORE DISINFORMATION on Leaked Documents Detail Al-Qaeda's Efforts To Fight Back Against Drones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah, always nice to see establishment lapdog cold fjord chime in in how we should murder children so as to spare our precious servicepeople from having to fight the war we fucking started. The US was fundamental in providing the resources al qaeda needed to even come into existence. Don't play dumb.

  4. Re:Not an accident on Just One Out of 16 Hybrids Pays Back In Gas Savings · · Score: 1

    There's a reason that gas cars are cheaper. The oil companies are not stupid. They know the price point at which alternative fuels become competitive with gas and they keep the price a little below that. The price of oil is not high enough for anything else to compete....and it'll stay that way barring government interference. It's good for oil companies, they're rolling in the dough. It's good for consumers, gas is cheap and plentiful. It's good for politicians, their voters are happy with them. When glitches happen to the fuel supply and price drives high then all sorts of alternative power supply comes out of the woodwork. The price never stays high for long though. No one wants expensive fuel.

    Dragging out the tired old oil company conspiracy again huh? So the car companies co-operate with this evil plan despite an overwhelming demand for a product that they could profitably sell, to prop up another industry? I suppose that works under the assumption that all big companies are evil, and thus colluding to screw the planet like some evil super-villain alliance. In the real world, I severely doubt that type of cartel-esque arrangement would hold up long. Forgive me, but I only see the Quid, but the pro quo seems to be missing in that arrangement. Gas never stays expensive long because it is still extremely plentiful, and so far the most efficient way to produce mechanical energy for mass consumption.

    Why wouldn't there be such collusion when the number of major gas providers across the US is so low, especially considering how impossible the market is to enter now that industry and government ties are set?