'"The mere fact that the device can be used for a non-infringing purpose is not a defence," read the ruling by Justice Floyd'
Umm, yes, in the UK, it is
Video recorders were allowed to be sold, despite the fact that they allowed for illegal sharing of recorded broadcasts precisely because they could be used for a non-infringing purpose
Nintendo should lose on appeal
Slashdot Mirror
'"The mere fact that the device can be used for a non-infringing purpose is not a defence," read the ruling by Justice Floyd' Umm, yes, in the UK, it is Video recorders were allowed to be sold, despite the fact that they allowed for illegal sharing of recorded broadcasts precisely because they could be used for a non-infringing purpose Nintendo should lose on appeal