If you are told that your door is unlocked, but you still don't lock it, and some robber comes and steals your stuff, the homeowner should be thrown in jail.
what's the point? losing your stuff should be motivation to lock your doors
maybe it could be the people whose credit card info has been stolen
How about unknown zero-days?
Why not make it really simple? If your system gets broken into, it's your fault. This same logic is very successful in many other such situations. The threat of punishment is enough all by itself to keep bad actors in line. You don't need to construct more government apparatus to oversee them.
While I believe that there might be some people who had no "morally" dubious intents, I fail to see why anyone with a traditional moral compass would sign up for this website
Exactly, this is like calling on terrorists to clean out the vermin in your attic and then wondering why the authorities are so upset with you.
When you define any extramarital intimacy as "cheating"
It is cheating no matter what.
So when I talk to my relatives about my childhood experiences (that's pretty intimate) and I don't mention them in the same detail to my wife, this is cheating?
I want to believe education solves the problem but I have met plenty of "well educated" people who are susceptible to the propaganda.
So you are surprised when people educated in physics and chemistry are not experts on human nature! My goodness I expect my car mechanic to be fully versed in all areas of philosophy.
What a boon for the wealthy! Every four years you get a fresh new politician with no influence, and no power. It makes racketeering and extortion so much easier.
If you go back in history, just about all wars were won when then victors pretty much stomped out the losers, across the board, to such an extent that they capitulated or were dead.
Really? US civil war? WW I? Korea? Iraq? Afghanistan?
I'm wondering if their proof requires the disk to actually write the data in the same order as the filesystem sends write commands to the disk. This is not necessarily true for disks that support command queuing, and certainly not true for SSDs.
RTFA:
"You literally have to consider every instruction or every disk operation"
Slashdot Mirror
If you are told that your door is unlocked, but you still don't lock it, and some robber comes and steals your stuff, the homeowner should be thrown in jail.
what's the point? losing your stuff should be motivation to lock your doors
What makes a system insecure?
the fact that it's been broken into
Who judges a system as secure/insecure?
maybe it could be the people whose credit card info has been stolen
How about unknown zero-days?
Why not make it really simple? If your system gets broken into, it's your fault. This same logic is very successful in many other such situations. The threat of punishment is enough all by itself to keep bad actors in line. You don't need to construct more government apparatus to oversee them.
While I believe that there might be some people who had no "morally" dubious intents, I fail to see why anyone with a traditional moral compass would sign up for this website
Exactly, this is like calling on terrorists to clean out the vermin in your attic and then wondering why the authorities are so upset with you.
ANY extramarital intimacy? Really? It's cheating when my wife talks to her brother about their childhood experiences?
When you define any extramarital intimacy as "cheating"
It is cheating no matter what.
So when I talk to my relatives about my childhood experiences (that's pretty intimate) and I don't mention them in the same detail to my wife, this is cheating?
When you define any extramarital intimacy as "cheating", you've already cut off the debate paths that the victims from the summary illustrate.
Wow, who actually says this? NOBODY.
And, yeah, I guess I'm a bit of a coward.
ya think? arguing with straw men kind of gives it away
No, I'm remarking on the fact that the city even tried to copyright the videos in the first place. Why do they even think it's their place to do that?
humans act like humans and you're surprised?
The U.S. was not defeated in Vietnam.
I'm confused, what do you call it when you pick up all your stuff and run away to not fight again? Most people would call that "defeated"
I want to believe education solves the problem but I have met plenty of "well educated" people who are susceptible to the propaganda.
So you are surprised when people educated in physics and chemistry are not experts on human nature! My goodness I expect my car mechanic to be fully versed in all areas of philosophy.
And the US Civil War? Like you really have to ask on this one... They pretty much invented "total war" during this one.
yes exactly right, the white supremacists gave up completely and faded away
No term limits. Just forbid incumbents.
What a boon for the wealthy! Every four years you get a fresh new politician with no influence, and no power. It makes racketeering and extortion so much easier.
If you go back in history, just about all wars were won when then victors pretty much stomped out the losers, across the board, to such an extent that they capitulated or were dead.
Really? US civil war? WW I? Korea? Iraq? Afghanistan?
let's give the power to google and microsoft and donald trump instead and see how that goes
produce paralysis through mass hysteria is spewed on cable news channels
only senile people in nursing homes are watching cable news any more
http://www.businessinsider.com/cable-tv-subscribers-plunging-2015-8
I have no other subversive desires.
And yes, I chose to post anonymously to avoid trollings.
posting anonymously is subversive
There is only one way to win war. That is to wipe out the opposition
and yet somehow the nazi skinhead white supremacist movement continues unabated
slashdot has truly degenerated into a cesspool when you consider that this drivel is one of the more insightful posts
before the job's soft real-time deadline has expired.
what does this have to do with anything?
I'm wondering if their proof requires the disk to actually write the data in the same order as the filesystem sends write commands to the disk. This is not necessarily true for disks that support command queuing, and certainly not true for SSDs.
RTFA:
"You literally have to consider every instruction or every disk operation"
But what about disk failure?
this is like expecting your seat belt to keep you safe during the apocalypse
That's why we have checksums.
checksums will only detect a single bit error, you've got to do better than that
the stars will implode and the universe will come to an end, how would any filesystem survive that?
what does this phrase even mean? why does speed or slowness matter? you can play the video of a disk disaster at any speed you want
i thought Journaled file systems already possessed this feature.
just like air bags and seat belts have eliminated all deaths on the road
If we can accept 'slow', it's not that difficult to build an always consistent filesystem.
citation required