Slashdot Mirror


User: LessTalc

LessTalc's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. Re:The compression algorithm... on Massive Storage Advances · · Score: 1

    No. Low entropy means highly compressible; high entropy means not very compressible (due to the data being disordered). He was right and you were wrong ha ha ha ha ha ha.

  2. Re:The compression algorithm... on Massive Storage Advances · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't show it - if you're getting visibly pissed off it's all the more entertaining for the ACs.

  3. Re:Always the size of a credit card on Massive Storage Advances · · Score: 1

    Also, the most important dimension of a credit card is its thinness. When people claim that devices are credit-card sized, they usually mean in only two dimensions. This technology is another example of that - the thing is 10mm thick. That's not sleek enough to carry around in your wallet!

  4. Re:The compression algorithm... on Massive Storage Advances · · Score: 1

    No need to cry

  5. Re:Er... on Vulnerability In SSH1 · · Score: 1

    You're still wrong. And you're a grotesquely ugly freak.

  6. Re:Er... on Vulnerability In SSH1 · · Score: 1
    Your theory would really only apply to to DSL or dialup and then only if the machine you were contacting was also connected directly to the internet with no sort of network attached to it.

    No! That is utterly meaningless. There is no such thing as "connected directly to the internet with no sort of network attached to it". The internet is a public network. Whenever you send data across a public network you should assume it is being sniffed. Apart from the fact that the original post was a joke.

  7. Re:Perverting the License on Using GPL/BSD Code In Closed Source Projects? · · Score: 1

    Listen, polar_bear, OpenSSH is licensed under the BSD license. It was developed by many of the same developers that work on OpenBSD.

  8. Flawed on Laptop Exams? · · Score: 3

    There are several reasons why this idea is flawed. Firstly, a fair exam requires that nobody in the exam can communicate with anyone else in the world during the exam. Anyone with a basic knowledge of cgi programming could easily cheat by punching the questions into a web form, having arranged previously for someone not taking the exam to collect this input and send some valid answers

    Secondly, equal opportunity. Laptops aint cheap.

    Thirdly, security. There's always going to be one kid in the class who leaves a script somewhere on the net to take out half his classmates. Even one successful DoS attack per exam would make the technique unacceptable. Firewalls? Well, how about using a small 2.4GHz frequency jammer. You can at least postpone the exam.

    I mean, if you're going to allow connectivity and communication, you might as well take away the time limit and call it "course work"

  9. Re:Rose-Hulman on Laptop Exams? · · Score: 4
    This school requires every incoming freshman to purchase a laptop. I think that this is a great policy

    Yes, that's fantastic. Good education could do with another way of weeding out the poor.