Slashdot Mirror


User: rmullins

rmullins's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Predator? on Man Has Nokia Phone Embedded In False Limb · · Score: 1

    All you need now is a shoulder-mounted, triple-laser guided canon.

  2. Re:Wrong power on DIY Laser Pistol Shoot 1MW Blasts · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's 1.21 Gigawatts.

  3. Re:Hey idiot grandson, did you learn your lesson? on Firefighters Let House Burn Because Owner Didn't Pay Fee · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you've never lived out in the country.... Everyone burns their trash in the country. What most people do is burn what they can and use a dumpster for everything else. That way you're not paying any more than is necessary for trash disposal. And no, there is no recycling pickup in the country - plastic gets burned along with the paper products. Take a drive out in the country sometime - I mean actually far away from any city - and you'll see that everyone has burn piles and 55 gal. burn cans.

  4. Re:80m? Quite a hair. on Sony Unveils Flexible OLED Thinner Than a Hair · · Score: 1

    Yes, and don't forget the State of Alaska, and the distance from there to Russia.

  5. We've got bigger issues on FTC States Bloggers Must Disclose Paid Reviews · · Score: 1

    I am in the online marketing industry and have mixed feelings about this.

    On one hand, I think it's very good because it will create more transparency which keeps the public from getting screwed. Believe me, there is A LOT of deception in this field, and it's always the consumer that takes the hit. As a practice though, I believe it's more valuable to the company to make sure the blogger is being completely honest about the product, and this decision would promote that - or at least let consumers know that they are dealing with a biased opinion.

    On the other hand, I wonder if this is an infringement on our constitutional rights. Take publications for example. I'm in the home theater industry - when we want a review in a publication of any sort, it is expected that we are going to advertise with that company. I've even had publications hold our product review hostage until we signed a year-long ad agreement. Everyone does this. Everyone. And you better believe that it effects what is written in the review. There's no way a publication is going to bash a product, even if it is completely deserved, if a year-long ad agreement is at stake.

    My point is that practically everything is biased for a myriad of reasons - don't even get me started on the News - but the question is, by cracking down on this system, are we restricting our Freedom of Speech?