I (for one) don't have any problem believing that we're causing climate changes. My problem is with the conclusions that are being based on insufficient data. Much more conclusive (to me) is the variations in temperature, CO2, and dust over the last 400,000 years as seen in the Vostok ice core (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok_Petit_data.svg). From that data I can only conclude that our "global warming" is offsetting the next ice age and that's probably a good thing.
then on the 1st round rock is 50:50; but rock is thrown then on the 2n round they can't throw rock again (that would be 100% rock when they _MUST_ throw rock 50% of the time); or if they didn't throw rock on the 1st round then they'd have to throw rock on the 2nd round, etc.;-)
Slashdot Mirror
>> What's your solution?
LFTR's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LFTR)
I (for one) don't have any problem believing that we're causing climate changes. My problem is with the conclusions that are being based on insufficient data. Much more conclusive (to me) is the variations in temperature, CO2, and dust over the last 400,000 years as seen in the Vostok ice core (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok_Petit_data.svg). From that data I can only conclude that our "global warming" is offsetting the next ice age and that's probably a good thing.
then on the 1st round rock is 50:50; but rock is thrown then on the 2n round they can't throw rock again (that would be 100% rock when they _MUST_ throw rock 50% of the time); or if they didn't throw rock on the 1st round then they'd have to throw rock on the 2nd round, etc. ;-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...