The first problem is that they can be dropped from future versions of GCC. They're not part of any standard, after all.
The second problem is that there are situations in which GCC isn't the most suitable compiler. You want to minimize hacks for each different compiler supported.
Security is a big thing, too. It's hard to audit fundamentally unpredictable code.
The British Highway Code requires you to drive at a speed that is safe for the prevailing conditions, such that you can stop safely in an emergency such as someone stepping out onto the road, and be able to maintain control of the vehicle at all times.
If a computer can't do that, then what's the use in an automated car?
In that case, there is virtually no situation in which passengers or bystanders is at significant risk. If they were, either control isn't being maintained or the car is travelling too fast to stop safely in an emergency under prevailing conditions.
America is one of the few countries that even calls it a crime.
Europe doesn't. Europe has stronger government, in many respects, yet is culturally relatively close, and values individual freedom as much as America but places a different balance between freedom from and freedom to.
Notice I do not call one better. It is a different balance, that is all.
That there are journalists and academics who cannot fathom a larger universe than their patch of ground is more troublesome than any finding they produced.
It also renders their findings worthless. Never trust an academic who doesn't understand what they are looking at.
You claim he's being reasonable but all I see is hand-waving, abuse and mysticism. Offer something solid or admit you can't.
I use the protocol. I use both. I have experience where all you offer is allegation. You want me to take you seriously? Offer a reason for your claim. A real reason.
Extended IPv4 was rejected for many good reasons. You never bothered to look them up, I see. I tend to listen to those who bother. Even if I disagree, I'll listen to those who bother.
Bit aligned fields are not simple. Fragmentation is not simple. IPv4 multicast is complicated. IPv4 anycast doesn't exist. IPv4 MobileIP is complicated. IPv4 DHCP is complicated, insecure and unreliable. IPv4 routing is slow and memory hungry.
I'm atheist and don't give a damn about protocol religion.
Only thing that matters is facts. Fact is, it is simpler. The primary header has word-aligned headers with simpler semantics, and none of the semantics that complicates things about IPv4. One word does one thing and does it well.
You've offered no contradiction to this, just some mysticism. IPv6 is simpler because each piece does less and there are fewer mandatory pieces.
One does not imply the other. In either direction.
A rev limiter on a car does not control where you go and, if you're a good driver, places no meaningful limit on how long it takes to get there.
Real teaching doesn't tell people what to think, real teaching is about guiding people into thinking. It doesn't matter how they think or what they think, as long as they can show their working and the logic is sound.
Parenting isn't that different. Optimize, maximize real freedom and real will, minimize stupid harm and pessimization.
Fields are properly aligned and have fixed meaning, making processing easier.
Routing is strictly hierarchical, so only four bytes need ever be examined - same as IPv4.
The header has a much simpler structure.
Addresses are (protocol):(location):(unique identifier). How much simpler can you get? Technically, all you have is the identifier, which you can take between ISPs that have IPv6 correctly configured. This guarantees mobility between ISPs without losing connection.
Configuring an IPv6 network? Radvd works fine. Don't need DHCP just DDNS. That's less complexity.
Address length? Who cares, it's only visible in misconfigured networks. Besides, because of the way it is composed and because of the express mobility, a full address doesn't mean anything except for fixed servers.
Correctly-configured IPv6 suffers no fragmentation, simplifying firewalls. It supports misconfigured systems, because admins are lazy, but you don't need stateful firewalls in IPv6.
Addresses are transient, only names are permanent, which means only machines deal with addresses.
Router protocols are simpler under IPv6 because the design is simpler. Latency is reduced, too.
Because the prefix identifies protocols, your stack doesn't need to check if you're in the unicast or multicast range, it checks one byte against a case statement.
Any options in the IPv4 header that were rarely used got moved to option headers. This means you've a modular design (cleaner), you don't need to process information you probably aren't going to use, and you can often ignore the extra headers anyway. Even if you don't, it invites cleaner, simpler, code.
Sorry, whoever told you IPv6 was more complex was full of it.
Emacs was said to be a perfectly good OS with built-in text editor.
When handling modular software, one module should do one thing and do it well, but the framework is responsible for ensuring deadlocks, crashes and security defects are confined to the module suffering them. Do that and it doesn't matter how buggy a component is, there's no contagion.
As you can see, the migration path cuts through Mongolia and Siberia, on its way to North America via Beringia. The consequence, unsurprisingly, is that people on that route have some (but not all) characteristics found in North Americans.
You cannot know, from simple observation, whether it's an import via Eastern Europe (a lot, especially Poles, migrated in the late 19th, early 20th centuries, but are still migrating today) or native.
What we can say is the tribe rejects his claim. Until he takes a DNA test, that's all we know.
Same attitudes, same abuse towards rivals, same embrace extend extinguish policy, same buying out success stories to illegally leverage a monopoly in other markets, same buggy products.
Gates wasn't the one who ordered the ISO group bribed to certify their Office data format as a standard. Bribery is wrong, even when done by slightly less rich people.
Gates didn't violate antitrust law by bundling Edge with Windows 10.
Gates didn't buy out Mojang or dismantle the community there.
He never directly made money off Linux, but did land at least one (possibly several) multi-million dollar per year jobs on the strength of Linux. The Transmeta shares I'll assume have historic value to a museum but not to Linus.
So he's a multi millionaire from Linux without making money from it.
It's less clear what the situation is with git. He may well have earned millions off speaking tours of businesses on the subject of proper attribution and decentralised archiving in content management, for all any of us would know.
Mind you, with so many kids to put through American schools (expensive) and American college (expensive), with their health system (expensive), he will need to. It's estimated that, in America, it costs about a million to go from pregnancy to graduating university. More, if you want quality.
Slashdot Mirror
Why? How?
Simply stating something as fact doesn't make it so.
We already know police, etc, get a room where they can install wiretap in private companies. We've seen on Slashdot eyewitness accounts of such rooms.
Police get no better access in municipal nets, arguably it may even be less access. Harder to threaten a government with new regulations.
Further, you can replace a government, you can't replace a corporation. There's no competition and the CEO doesn't answer to the populace.
More so. The current regime censors already, so that's fact. The other is purely speculative.
The first problem is that they can be dropped from future versions of GCC. They're not part of any standard, after all.
The second problem is that there are situations in which GCC isn't the most suitable compiler. You want to minimize hacks for each different compiler supported.
Security is a big thing, too. It's hard to audit fundamentally unpredictable code.
A major step forward.
The British Highway Code requires you to drive at a speed that is safe for the prevailing conditions, such that you can stop safely in an emergency such as someone stepping out onto the road, and be able to maintain control of the vehicle at all times.
If a computer can't do that, then what's the use in an automated car?
In that case, there is virtually no situation in which passengers or bystanders is at significant risk. If they were, either control isn't being maintained or the car is travelling too fast to stop safely in an emergency under prevailing conditions.
What's the problem?
You know, I doubt Thomas Jefferson would disagree. He supported freedom of speech, not freedom from responsibility.
America is one of the few countries that even calls it a crime.
Europe doesn't. Europe has stronger government, in many respects, yet is culturally relatively close, and values individual freedom as much as America but places a different balance between freedom from and freedom to.
Notice I do not call one better. It is a different balance, that is all.
That there are journalists and academics who cannot fathom a larger universe than their patch of ground is more troublesome than any finding they produced.
It also renders their findings worthless. Never trust an academic who doesn't understand what they are looking at.
How is it not CIDR?
Name a complexity added.
You claim he's being reasonable but all I see is hand-waving, abuse and mysticism. Offer something solid or admit you can't.
I use the protocol. I use both. I have experience where all you offer is allegation. You want me to take you seriously? Offer a reason for your claim. A real reason.
Extended IPv4 was rejected for many good reasons. You never bothered to look them up, I see. I tend to listen to those who bother. Even if I disagree, I'll listen to those who bother.
Bit aligned fields are not simple.
Fragmentation is not simple.
IPv4 multicast is complicated.
IPv4 anycast doesn't exist.
IPv4 MobileIP is complicated.
IPv4 DHCP is complicated, insecure and unreliable.
IPv4 routing is slow and memory hungry.
These are reasons.
I'm atheist and don't give a damn about protocol religion.
Only thing that matters is facts. Fact is, it is simpler. The primary header has word-aligned headers with simpler semantics, and none of the semantics that complicates things about IPv4. One word does one thing and does it well.
You've offered no contradiction to this, just some mysticism. IPv6 is simpler because each piece does less and there are fewer mandatory pieces.
They contributed JFS and ported DB/2. They ported Linux to their mainframes and ran the first Linux TV ads. During a superbowl, I think.
On the other hand, their maintenance of these projects, other than their mainframe, has been limited.
Start modern kids on a TRS80 or a PET3032 and weaning them won't be a problem.
Start them on an Altair or UK101 and police will be investigating a mysterious homicide in which the parent was killed by force-feeding of microchips.
Both are true until observed. I
The usual rule is 55% nature, 45% nurture, +/- 10%, where most of that 10% is decided by the last trimester through to age 24.
In other words, 10% is three standard deviations from the mean.
Between monitoring and controlling.
One does not imply the other. In either direction.
A rev limiter on a car does not control where you go and, if you're a good driver, places no meaningful limit on how long it takes to get there.
Real teaching doesn't tell people what to think, real teaching is about guiding people into thinking. It doesn't matter how they think or what they think, as long as they can show their working and the logic is sound.
Parenting isn't that different. Optimize, maximize real freedom and real will, minimize stupid harm and pessimization.
If you have IPv6 correctly installed, all reconfiguration is strongly authenticated.
If you don't have it correctly installed, sounding like a defeated Joker won't fix your problems.
I should add I've also several static IPv4 addresses, but also several IPv6 addresses since 1996. Please play again.
There is no extra complexity.
Fields are properly aligned and have fixed meaning, making processing easier.
Routing is strictly hierarchical, so only four bytes need ever be examined - same as IPv4.
The header has a much simpler structure.
Addresses are (protocol):(location):(unique identifier). How much simpler can you get? Technically, all you have is the identifier, which you can take between ISPs that have IPv6 correctly configured. This guarantees mobility between ISPs without losing connection.
Configuring an IPv6 network? Radvd works fine. Don't need DHCP just DDNS. That's less complexity.
Address length? Who cares, it's only visible in misconfigured networks. Besides, because of the way it is composed and because of the express mobility, a full address doesn't mean anything except for fixed servers.
Correctly-configured IPv6 suffers no fragmentation, simplifying firewalls. It supports misconfigured systems, because admins are lazy, but you don't need stateful firewalls in IPv6.
Addresses are transient, only names are permanent, which means only machines deal with addresses.
Router protocols are simpler under IPv6 because the design is simpler. Latency is reduced, too.
Because the prefix identifies protocols, your stack doesn't need to check if you're in the unicast or multicast range, it checks one byte against a case statement.
Any options in the IPv4 header that were rarely used got moved to option headers. This means you've a modular design (cleaner), you don't need to process information you probably aren't going to use, and you can often ignore the extra headers anyway. Even if you don't, it invites cleaner, simpler, code.
Sorry, whoever told you IPv6 was more complex was full of it.
How is it a security nightmare? It's simpler and more secure. I should know, I was one of the earliest adopters.
Emacs was said to be a perfectly good OS with built-in text editor.
When handling modular software, one module should do one thing and do it well, but the framework is responsible for ensuring deadlocks, crashes and security defects are confined to the module suffering them. Do that and it doesn't matter how buggy a component is, there's no contagion.
IPv6 should be the only protocol running. Your router can transparently convert to legacy formats.
The best possible/the most secure - these are relative concepts, not absolute.
Besides, systemd is no more Linux than Emacs or KDE.
Not really. The same facial features can be found in almost any one of East European descent, and a lot of those migrated over a hundred years ago.
The reason is simple and has to do with how slowly things change and DNA migration.
https://dna-explained.com/2017...
https://phillipsdnaproject.com...
Here's the physiological result:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blo...
http://realhistoryww.com./worl...
As you can see, the migration path cuts through Mongolia and Siberia, on its way to North America via Beringia. The consequence, unsurprisingly, is that people on that route have some (but not all) characteristics found in North Americans.
You cannot know, from simple observation, whether it's an import via Eastern Europe (a lot, especially Poles, migrated in the late 19th, early 20th centuries, but are still migrating today) or native.
What we can say is the tribe rejects his claim. Until he takes a DNA test, that's all we know.
I've taken another look.
Same attitudes, same abuse towards rivals, same embrace extend extinguish policy, same buying out success stories to illegally leverage a monopoly in other markets, same buggy products.
Gates wasn't the one who ordered the ISO group bribed to certify their Office data format as a standard. Bribery is wrong, even when done by slightly less rich people.
Gates didn't violate antitrust law by bundling Edge with Windows 10.
Gates didn't buy out Mojang or dismantle the community there.
Not as easy to answer as you might think.
He never directly made money off Linux, but did land at least one (possibly several) multi-million dollar per year jobs on the strength of Linux. The Transmeta shares I'll assume have historic value to a museum but not to Linus.
So he's a multi millionaire from Linux without making money from it.
It's less clear what the situation is with git. He may well have earned millions off speaking tours of businesses on the subject of proper attribution and decentralised archiving in content management, for all any of us would know.
Mind you, with so many kids to put through American schools (expensive) and American college (expensive), with their health system (expensive), he will need to. It's estimated that, in America, it costs about a million to go from pregnancy to graduating university. More, if you want quality.
Check for a suspiciously humming blue box with a telephone cabinet on the front.
Or accept that most people know not to trust Microsoft. Either works.
Although if anyone here has seen such a box, please let me know. I promise, I am not The Master. Look into my eyes. I am not The Master.