I'll have to second this. Links is an excellent text mode browser. I use it on Linux at work and on OS/2 on my home computer. Very fast and nice page formatting. There are some minor features that I miss from Lynx but the overall functionality makes up for them. I find myself using Netscape less and less.
yes, you can configure Icewm. You don't need to have the taskbar enabled. I've used this wm for over a year now. It is _very_ stable_ and very useful without the mouse. I detest wm that require me to use the mouse. This message posted from Lynx.
I still don't understand why KDE and related programs can't be packaged under "non-free" and distributed as such. QT doesn't seem that much less open than, say the pine sources or the GIF plugins for gimp. What am I missing here?
Maybe I'm missing something here but how is Slashdot a non-profit and why does it have an.org domain? If I remember correctly it is owned by a "for profit" type company. It seems to me like the same type of abuse of the TLD's.
Slashdot Mirror
I'll have to second this. Links is an excellent text mode browser. I use it on Linux at work and on OS/2 on my home computer. Very fast and nice page formatting. There are some minor features that I miss from Lynx but the overall functionality makes up for them. I find myself using Netscape less and less.
yes, you can configure Icewm. You don't need to have the taskbar enabled. I've used this wm for over a year now. It is _very_ stable_ and very useful without the mouse. I detest wm that require me to use the mouse. This message posted from Lynx.
I use icewm and I haven't found anything in it that I can't easily do with the keyboard.
ctrl-esc = menu
atl-tab = switch tasks
alt-esc = lower window
ctrl-shift-esc = window list
atl-F5 = restore
alt-F7 = move
alt-F8 = resize
alt-F9 = minimize
alt-F10 = maximize
alt-F12 = roll up window
alt-F1 = raise window
alt-F3 = lower window
alt-F4 = close window
There's more key bindings but those get 90% of my work done. On top of that, it is a lean and stable wm.
I still don't understand why KDE and related programs can't be packaged under "non-free" and distributed as such. QT doesn't seem that much less open than, say the pine sources or the GIF plugins for gimp. What am I missing here?
Maybe I'm missing something here but how is Slashdot a non-profit and why does it have an .org domain? If I remember correctly it is owned by a "for profit" type company. It seems to me like the same type of abuse of the TLD's.
I don't know, (and I've been looking) but if you find out let me know too.