Slashdot Mirror


User: rgcombs

rgcombs's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:Too big to fail on Clinton Hints At Tech Industry Compromise Over Encryption (huffingtonpost.co.uk) · · Score: 0

    "There should be no bank too big to fail and no individual too big to jail." —Hillary

    I laughed at the irony of that statement, considering that she's the subject of multiple FBI investigations right now.

  2. Re:If you get a back door on Clinton Hints At Tech Industry Compromise Over Encryption (huffingtonpost.co.uk) · · Score: 0

    The "trouble qualifying" you've heard about is for the main stage debates (the debate sponsors decide who qualifies). AFAIK, Rand Paul is on all the currently settled GOP primary election ballots (or caucuses where applicable). He's actually likely to do quite well in Iowa (maybe top 3).

  3. Re:If you get a back door on Clinton Hints At Tech Industry Compromise Over Encryption (huffingtonpost.co.uk) · · Score: 0

    Are there any candidates (where "candidate" is defined as someone who has actually gotten on the ballot in enough states for it to be possible to win, not a write-in) who would not support the compromise of encryption? I'm not talking about just from the major parties; I'm talking about literally any candidate that managed to get on the ballot.

    In the GOP, Sen. Rand Paul. In the Libertarian Party, whoever gets the nomination (probably Gov. Gary Johnson). In the Democratic Party, nobody.

  4. Ignorance of economics abounds on When Libertarians Attack Free Software · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, there sure are a lot of comments by economic illiterates and leftists (but I repeat myself), not to mention people who know nothing about libertarianism. At least someone finally got around to mentioning ESR, who is not only a libertarian, but an anarcho-libertarian.