Someone puts a lot of effort into writting software that is avaiolable for downloading free. And because it doesn't promote a product that costs a lot of open money they are bad?
I would love to know what product Mr Mundy is refering to. How much effort has his company put forth to provide a compatible set of drivers? Or is he too busy spending the money he makes selling adaptive technology to invest in those he earns money from?
I say that if he is so concerned, he should contact the developer and offer his product free and help make it supported. Stop leaching off blind people! There is too much of that already.
Now put up or shut up. If you need contact information I can help there. A valid email address to offer assistance to is pda@1tree.net. It will be posted here for the world to see if this is a true desire to help the blind, or a blatent attempt to get their money.
I am amazed by this thread. First, there are blind hackers out there. They are the primary force behind the distribution. Second, M$ is not the blind person's friend. Microslop revealed their true color with Internet Explorer 4. The product broke almost every screen reader on the market. I know of only one company claiming to not have suffered. They didn't suffer because they don't use the "off screen model." M$ will break the thing again when it is expediant. Also, many items are NOT accessible to blind users. There are numerous programs that sort of are accessible. I live with a blind person. There are buttons in a large number of programs that are not accessible, and or don't read. And some of them are needed to make setting changes. Third, for those who don't know, blind people are making use of XWindows programs even without having access to X. But most things use X only as a front end to a program that can otherwise work. This fact makes it a better platform. Lastly, at least in Linux one can access the code. If something doesn't work, then the people doing development can go in and find why and work on that. Speech in Linux is going into the kernel. That has never happened in the M$ world. 1Tree
Slashdot Mirror
Someone puts a lot of effort into writting software that is avaiolable for downloading free. And because it doesn't promote a product that costs a lot of open money they are bad?
I would love to know what product Mr Mundy is refering to. How much effort has his company put forth to provide a compatible set of drivers? Or is he too busy spending the money he makes selling adaptive technology to invest in those he earns money from?
I say that if he is so concerned, he should contact the developer and offer his product free and help make it supported. Stop leaching off blind people! There is too much of that already.
Now put up or shut up. If you need contact information I can help there. A valid email address to offer assistance to is pda@1tree.net. It will be posted here for the world to see if this is a true desire to help the blind, or a blatent attempt to get their money.
1Tree
I am amazed by this thread. First, there are blind hackers out there. They are the primary force behind the distribution. Second, M$ is not the blind person's friend. Microslop revealed their true color with Internet Explorer 4. The product broke almost every screen reader on the market. I know of only one company claiming to not have suffered. They didn't suffer because they don't use the "off screen model." M$ will break the thing again when it is expediant. Also, many items are NOT accessible to blind users. There are numerous programs that sort of are accessible. I live with a blind person. There are buttons in a large number of programs that are not accessible, and or don't read. And some of them are needed to make setting changes. Third, for those who don't know, blind people are making use of XWindows programs even without having access to X. But most things use X only as a front end to a program that can otherwise work. This fact makes it a better platform. Lastly, at least in Linux one can access the code. If something doesn't work, then the people doing development can go in and find why and work on that. Speech in Linux is going into the kernel. That has never happened in the M$ world. 1Tree