Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Users

User: DarkLurker

DarkLurker's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:Heh on SCO Says It Has No Plan To Sue Linux Companies · · Score: 2, Funny

    Farther south... Hmmmm....

    The Ode of SCO

    Midway between the tongue and toes
    Is where their little pecker goes
    They turned their head and gave a cough
    and out popped greasy Microsoft
    Toward their front was hard Big Blue
    Behind them Tux was lubed to screw
    And in the end, they took it long,
    That mighty, horny Linux dong
    Their mouth agape, their eyes bugged out
    It hurt so bad they had to shout
    "We lied, I say, we really lied.
    And all because of Darl McBride.
    Please take it out and go away,
    We now know TUX IS HERE TO STAY!!!"
    ==

    Windows is DEAD!!!
    SCOldera can BITE ME!!!
    LONG LIVE TUX!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. When they outlaw NATs... on State "Communication Services" Laws Analyzed · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Only Outlaws will have NATs!

    Or how about:

    They can take my Coyote Linux box when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!

    Can you tell I'm a Southerner???

    Windows is Dead!
    Long Live Tux!!!

  3. MBARI site on New Deep Sea Squid · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to the story on the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Instute
    (MBARI) site

    straight from the source...

  4. Only chicks can exploit this... on Remote 'Root' Exploit in IIS 5.0 · · Score: 2
    From the Microsoft writeup:
    A security vulnerability results because the ISAPI extension contains an unchecked buffer in a section of code that handles input parameters. This could enable a remote attacker to conduct a buffer overrun attack and cause code of her choice to run on the server. Such code would run in the Local System security context. This would give the attacker complete control of the server, and would enable her to take virtually any action she chose.

    The attacker could exploit the vulnerability against any server with which she could conduct a web session. No other services would need to be available, and only port 80 (HTTP) or 443 (HTTPS) would need to be open. Clearly, this is a very serious vulnerability, and Microsoft strongly recommends that all IIS 5.0 administrators install the patch immediately. Alternatively, customers who cannot install the patch can protect their systems by removing the mapping for Internet Printing ISAPI extension.
    So, as you can see, only a FEMALE hacker can exploit this vulnerability. And since the current /. poll shows us that females (or, more accurately, famales) are outnumbered 20:1, we really don't need to worry about this.

    Windows is dead!