...the courts have chosen to completely ignore the straightforward wording...
Well, they kinda have to, otherwise the judge will be... replaced. These guys are a pretty tight group. They don't make their careers by rocking the boat. The voters are the last hope. If they can't be bothered then all bets are off. The constitution is just another piece of nice literature describing an imaginary land that does not exist in the physical realm.
Start by making the patent non-transferable. The owner can sell a non-exclusive license (meaning that anyone who can pay the price gets to use the patent, prohibition not allowed) to anyone who wants to use it. And since the government issues patents, they have a right to control license pricing to avoid said extortion. But there are no rich lobbyists to advocate such changes and the voters don't give a shit, so let's not get our hopes up yet.
Yeah, and I also frequently bump the little problem of intentional misinterpretation by the listener for many various reasons that require the simplest thoughts take up the entire Library of Congress to explain to them. Most of the Tolstoy written around here is just people who like to pontificate and express a demeanor of superiority. It's all word masturbation. There is no need to overcomplicate things.
Damn near! Shit moves pretty slowly. Look how many years we spent riding a damn horse until the right guy could build an engine. You gotta ask, why did everything happen so recently?
Actually, the right people can make anything work. More than a few ideas are being given a bad rap because of lousy execution. But, we're still looking for the right people, definitely in the wrong place. Elusive as unicorns they appear to be.
I figure it even though I totally support dismantling most of what the federal government does until someone tells me I don't have to file a 1040 form...
I would prefer to just make them do the paperwork. Turn the Department of Internal Revenue into a Service!
Or the people can push you out of the way so they can enable themselves. Without public oversight, the whole thing is bullshit. The basic problem is excessive submissiveness and obedience in an appeal to curry favor with authority... It's much easier to be the prison yard snitch than to tear down the walls and break out. The people already have what they want. Convenience. They really don't care what goes on behind the scenes.
But yeah, they will cut corners and make nuclear power look comparatively less risky. We probably should use whatever technology that will cause the least damage with the most vodka.
The scam is working perfectly. There is absolutely no talk of any other parties or independents in mass media. The democrats have both sides locked up, while the republicans remain the comedic side show, which also seems to intentionally scare people over to the democrats.
Eh, we all know the routine, if Hillary wins, your hedge funds will never do better...
And this 'solar panel' thing? Please... the whole thing sounds like a soon to be abandoned industrial park, here we go again with the democrat's *chicken in every pot* routine (probably with the accompanying world war), but the blip on Wall Street will make a few bucks for somebody.
Our 'democracy' so far is only showing that we are horrible at delegating responsibility... I mean, if you're not going to enforce the rules, why bother going through the motions?
Yes, we should take control of the cops. However, I think you will find more people are in support of this than are against it. If we are outnumbered, there is not much we can do. We cannot appeal to a 'better nature' that does not exist. We have to convince people it is in their self interest to prosecute for justice.
...the courts have chosen to completely ignore the straightforward wording...
Well, they kinda have to, otherwise the judge will be... replaced. These guys are a pretty tight group. They don't make their careers by rocking the boat. The voters are the last hope. If they can't be bothered then all bets are off. The constitution is just another piece of nice literature describing an imaginary land that does not exist in the physical realm.
I believe these requirements should be as universal as possible, not just for autistics.
Start by making the patent non-transferable. The owner can sell a non-exclusive license (meaning that anyone who can pay the price gets to use the patent, prohibition not allowed) to anyone who wants to use it. And since the government issues patents, they have a right to control license pricing to avoid said extortion. But there are no rich lobbyists to advocate such changes and the voters don't give a shit, so let's not get our hopes up yet.
...have ownership of a patent...
I'll see what I can find on Craigslist...
Yeah, I think they notice when I zoom in the page all the time. I keep getting ads for new reading glasses.
This sounds like a good opportunity.
I'm in the money...
Yeah, and I also frequently bump the little problem of intentional misinterpretation by the listener for many various reasons that require the simplest thoughts take up the entire Library of Congress to explain to them. Most of the Tolstoy written around here is just people who like to pontificate and express a demeanor of superiority. It's all word masturbation. There is no need to overcomplicate things.
When do they have their their white sale? On Black Friday?
So big I couldn't zoom out. I had to open the pictures by themselves to make them fit the screen.
There's no magic that keeps solar installers safer than roofing installers.
Sky hooks! And we clean the panels with Prop Wash®... The real pros use Jet Blast®
Damn near! Shit moves pretty slowly. Look how many years we spent riding a damn horse until the right guy could build an engine. You gotta ask, why did everything happen so recently?
Actually, the right people can make anything work. More than a few ideas are being given a bad rap because of lousy execution. But, we're still looking for the right people, definitely in the wrong place. Elusive as unicorns they appear to be.
Let me be honest.... Brevity is a virtue :-)
You make no sense. The permit cannot legally regulate speech. But the law? PFFT! Might makes right!
Bernie Sanders? This Bernie Sanders? What's not to love?
I figure it even though I totally support dismantling most of what the federal government does until someone tells me I don't have to file a 1040 form...
I would prefer to just make them do the paperwork. Turn the Department of Internal Revenue into a Service!
Or the people can push you out of the way so they can enable themselves. Without public oversight, the whole thing is bullshit. The basic problem is excessive submissiveness and obedience in an appeal to curry favor with authority... It's much easier to be the prison yard snitch than to tear down the walls and break out. The people already have what they want. Convenience. They really don't care what goes on behind the scenes.
God wants us to use oil!
Ha ha ha! Very funny!
Ah, okay, not necessarily you and me. This so the industry can shift inventory around a little easier.
stupid autocorrect
I dissabled mine, obviously :-)
But yeah, they will cut corners and make nuclear power look comparatively less risky. We probably should use whatever technology that will cause the least damage with the most vodka.
The scam is working perfectly. There is absolutely no talk of any other parties or independents in mass media. The democrats have both sides locked up, while the republicans remain the comedic side show, which also seems to intentionally scare people over to the democrats.
Eh, we all know the routine, if Hillary wins, your hedge funds will never do better...
And this 'solar panel' thing? Please... the whole thing sounds like a soon to be abandoned industrial park, here we go again with the democrat's *chicken in every pot* routine (probably with the accompanying world war), but the blip on Wall Street will make a few bucks for somebody.
If speech can be restricted, there is no free speech. It's a generic thing. Live with it!
...so rogue states can be punished.
With drones...
Our 'democracy' so far is only showing that we are horrible at delegating responsibility... I mean, if you're not going to enforce the rules, why bother going through the motions?
Yes, we should take control of the cops. However, I think you will find more people are in support of this than are against it. If we are outnumbered, there is not much we can do. We cannot appeal to a 'better nature' that does not exist. We have to convince people it is in their self interest to prosecute for justice.