Slashdot Mirror


User: fustakrakich

fustakrakich's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13,737
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13,737

  1. Re:Nice looking but... on Irish Artist Turns Google Maps Screen Grabs Into Pricey Art · · Score: 1
  2. For real safety on Scientists Tout New Way To Debug Surgical Bots · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do not connect these things to the internet, please.

  3. Re:Good riddance on Margaret Thatcher Dies At 87 · · Score: 0

    All that stuff is imaginary bullshit, a diversion. It only matters to the currency speculators. Pay no attention to it.

  4. Nice looking but... on Irish Artist Turns Google Maps Screen Grabs Into Pricey Art · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's like looking at Google maps through a kaleidoscope.

  5. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    Without those, there is no reason to create and innovate.

    Yeah, we would still be in the stone age.

    You're right, there is no longer any point in 'discussing' this, especially when all I'm going to hear is debunked old bullshit.. You win...

  6. Re:The word is cracker, not hacker on The Rise of Everyday Hackers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, a cracker is a thin, crisp wafer often eaten with cheese or other savory toppings.

  7. Re:Good riddance on Margaret Thatcher Dies At 87 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm pretty sure 8% growth in GDP benefits everyone.

    To vastly different degrees, yes. And the people who got fucked simply don't exist.

  8. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    The only truly reasonable thing to do is abolish copyrights and patents. It's not creating new law, it's eliminating old abusive law. The sig completes this post.

  9. Giant crabs? on Increased Carbon Emissions Creating Giant Crabs · · Score: 1

    What next? Jumbo shrimp?

  10. Re:Maybe people are writing better patents...nope. on Study Suggests Patent Office Lowered Standards To Cope With Backlog · · Score: 1

    This time it is Obama's fault!

    Everything since 2009...

  11. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    Yes, theory and practice are vastly different things, and due to its inevitable abuse, abolishment is by far the best way to handle the issue.

  12. Re:Obviously the cached content was not current on Google Cache Makes Murdoch's K-12 Site Look Obscene · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I can think of a politician or two...

  13. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    Why should I need to upgrade if the previous version suits my needs? Updates could be made by third parties. Copyright is a privilege. Refusal to sell is an abuse of that privilege. It creates a false scarcity. Of course that is the very basis of capitalism, so I don't expect any relief for the foreseeable future.

  14. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    No, the word 'reasonable' applies. It's used all the time when writing legislation. Basically, if they want to keep the privilege, they must sell to anyone who wants to buy at a reasonable price.

  15. Re:Good riddance on Margaret Thatcher Dies At 87 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, she and Saint Ronnie were a matched set... They made vast fortunes for their friends

  16. Margaret Thatcher was prime minister for on Margaret Thatcher Dies At 87 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A) 900 years
    B) 3,000 years
    C) 11 years

  17. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    A car is a physical thing. If somebody takes it, I'm out a car. Copyright/patent is a privilege that should come with limits. If I refuse to license or sell them, I should lose all privileges over them so that somebody else can.

  18. Re:MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    Yep.. why not? Why is Ubuntu in there? Isn't it already freely available?

  19. MS won't sell or support XP anymore? on Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP · · Score: 1

    It's only logical that they lose all property 'rights' to it.

  20. Re:DEA can't TAP it on Is the DEA Lying About iMessage Security? · · Score: 2

    The REAL issue is that there is NO LEGAL MANDATE for Apple to do so.

    Actually we don't know that. Secret laws and all. There could be a gag order to keep them from mentioning it, like a national security letter. With all this secrecy, we don't have a clue of who knows what, leaving us to assume the worse, which is the recommended way of dealing with any of this.

  21. Re:Obviously the cached content was not current on Google Cache Makes Murdoch's K-12 Site Look Obscene · · Score: 2

    There, no one died.

    False! I bet you that more than 5,000 people died in the time it took you to write that post. The good news is that as a result of people committing 'obscenities', around 7,000 more were born.

  22. Re:DEA can't TAP it on Is the DEA Lying About iMessage Security? · · Score: 2

    The issue is that Apple won't open a giant backdoors and look the other way...

    Why not? I mean, aside from the possibility of getting caught...

  23. Re:Probably talking about two different things... on Is the DEA Lying About iMessage Security? · · Score: 1

    Higher level drug runners have nothing to worry about, until they outlive their usefulness. They are well protected government employees.

  24. Re:PGP on Is the DEA Lying About iMessage Security? · · Score: 1

    That too might be disinformacija.(sic)

    Got news for ya, buddy. So is their story about 9/11, but we had to reopen the opium supply line somehow.

  25. FTA: on Is the DEA Lying About iMessage Security? · · Score: 1

    I'd like to think that law enforcement is above attempting such tricks, but unfortunately that might just be naive these days.

    Might be?? I would say extremely so.. An indication the writer has no knowledge of history... Or maybe just something he has to say to avoid legal issues, or worse..