Oh, and one rich guy losing his head to another rich guy does not make your silly case any more valid. But I thought I'd spell it out since you're not getting it
We saw what compromise do did the democrats in 2010. There comes a time when you have to say no and take a stand. Otherwise it's nothing but a slow surrender, pretty much what we have done since 2001 in surrendering our rights in general.
In the US over the last 30 years, sure. Historically speaking, not even close.
Which is highly inaccurate. The other person disagrees apparently, but he is wrong. Historically speaking the upper class always wins, whether it's 'revolution' or union organizing. 30 Years ago it merely became more obvious, and the trend accelerated, but there was no significant change.
He has people gaping. He has a bigger more fanatical audience than the Osbournes and the Kardashians. He is dominating world attention. That's all that matters. He hardly cares about travel bans and legislation. Those are simple brain farts to feed the media frenzy. And nobody can deny it's working beautifully. The ratings are through the roof.
If there is a sad part of this story, it's the lack of credible opposition, from anywhere, least of all the voters. People stick with the devil they know and now they get to live with it.
One single instance also through high finance ('Revolution' can't happen without it, and you never mentioned it until now). And the guy replacing him wasn't exactly in the poor house, one rich guy replacing another, and it hardly fits under the original banner of 'generally speaking' in case you care about staying on topic.. So, please. pull the other one.
As are the hysterical responses from the democrats, and the press. Trump has accomplished the closest thing to world domination as we'll ever see. Every single thing is becoming an editorial about him.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah well, in the UK (and the US too?) I believe they can order you to give yours up if they bump into anything they can't decipher.
What nonsense. Until people turn away he has full consent.
Oh, and one rich guy losing his head to another rich guy does not make your silly case any more valid. But I thought I'd spell it out since you're not getting it
? Laugh it up, furball. Ya still can't name a time where it's not the case.
We saw what compromise do did the democrats in 2010. There comes a time when you have to say no and take a stand. Otherwise it's nothing but a slow surrender, pretty much what we have done since 2001 in surrendering our rights in general.
The initial premise here was (at one time):
Generally speaking, the upper class wins
In the US over the last 30 years, sure. Historically speaking, not even close.
Which is highly inaccurate. The other person disagrees apparently, but he is wrong. Historically speaking the upper class always wins, whether it's 'revolution' or union organizing. 30 Years ago it merely became more obvious, and the trend accelerated, but there was no significant change.
I retired Skype
You still here? And such projection!
More likely there will be no windows. Just not worth the expense.
I want Ted Striker and Elaine Dickinson as my pilots
citation found!
Vectors vs. bitmaps, which compresses better?
Which is more likely, hard drive failure or connection/cloud service failure, bankruptcy, etc? At least you can secure your hard drive, in theory.
We're supposed to be developing adequate encryption and ad hoc mesh networks to bypass the ISPs anyway.
Check out who financed the labor union movement, and the kinds of people that run it now, or even then. It took a lot of money to make it happen.
Compromise means victory, for the other side. That is what the election results show.
See how you make shit up? Of course nobody expects you to notice. You're kinda Trump-like and prone to projection... Eh...
This is how you blow bubbles. The real trick is knowing when to cash out.
:-) You're jus' goofin' around...
Sorry, you're the one making shit up, not me. But hey, you're just messing around anyway, not reading what I wrote, etc. Pretty transparent.
All of them, and a shitload of people outside the border too.
He has people gaping. He has a bigger more fanatical audience than the Osbournes and the Kardashians. He is dominating world attention. That's all that matters. He hardly cares about travel bans and legislation. Those are simple brain farts to feed the media frenzy. And nobody can deny it's working beautifully. The ratings are through the roof.
If there is a sad part of this story, it's the lack of credible opposition, from anywhere, least of all the voters. People stick with the devil they know and now they get to live with it.
One single instance also through high finance ('Revolution' can't happen without it, and you never mentioned it until now). And the guy replacing him wasn't exactly in the poor house, one rich guy replacing another, and it hardly fits under the original banner of 'generally speaking' in case you care about staying on topic.. So, please. pull the other one.
You win again... Just can't argue with the obtuse.
As are the hysterical responses from the democrats, and the press. Trump has accomplished the closest thing to world domination as we'll ever see. Every single thing is becoming an editorial about him.