Most of the people on this site are likely working in the tech industry or studying to work in the tech industry, if discrimination were a prevalent problem there would epic whining about it here.
The summary mentions wireless a couple of times but it doesn't explicitly mention wired connections. That's probably what is meant by "broadband", but that's a somewhat non-specific term. You actually have to read the article.. but we all know that no one here does that.
There are assholes on both sides of the political spectrum, and many from both end up in court. It's not about what the assholes are up to. What matters is whether or not the law treats everyone fairly. Going to court sucks, but it's part of the process. A neighbor and I had to repeatedly contact law enforcement and code enforcement over something similar. The city threatened to take it to court, and that settled the matter. It'd be nice if it didn't go that far, but if someone thinks they're in the right, it can be difficult to persuade them otherwise.
An opposite of the equal treatment concept would be affirmative action. That is an example of laws that selectively benefit only certain groups of people, and it's not something that you can blame on "conservatives".
I think Comcast has prior art here. Such as the story the other day of a Comcast rep changing a customer's first name to "Asshole". The significance is that Comcast can get away with it. They're part of a monopoly or equally bad duopoly in many of the areas they serve. Uber is not. A company that denigrates its customers isn't going to be able to keep its customers, and that opens the door for another competitor to step in.
You used an example that contradicts your own point. You're not very good at this.
So what if it took a court case? That's where grievances are heard. That's the whole point of having courts. What do you want to see happen? You want Judge Dredd to roll up and shoot the homeowner?
To be gender blind one would not even count the number of students in the different demographics and would not be able to see that there are any underrepresented demographics. The problem is how to encourage underrepresented demographics to participate without discouraging over represented demographics from participating.
Why do all demographics have to be represented equally?
Wait a minute.. what kind of cruel state still defines our little darlings as being either boy or girl? That's clearly not the type of progressive thinking we should be pushing for. Do they still have separate but equal bathrooms? The horror! Frankly, CS enrollments are the least of the problems in such backward thinking divisive environments. Won't somebody please think of the children?
It would send a message to Turks that their culture is fucked up.
Would it? I imagine they're used to not having the things that people in other countries have. I get what you're saying, but if social media leaves, they're left with dangerous options such as meeting in person. Makes it easy for the government to deal with them.
Look at what's happening in Russia. The anti-blogger laws went into effect. Have the people done anything to stop it?
If they pull out of Turkey, what impact on free speech does that have? Do the people living there have any equivalent means of mass communication? Social media can help foster change, but if the major social media offerings all leave an area in protest, what does that leave the people?
I have a Google Nexus. 4.3 is the last version supporting my phone. The phone does everything I need it to, so I don't want to waste money on a newer one. I think this is a blatant attempt to force people to buy newer phones. All their craplets get updated, but not the Android OS.
That DSL competition is the only reason I have DSL. Verizon sent me a modem, it couldn't connect. They do very little troubleshooting before they decided to say that DSL wasn't available in my area. One of the other DSL providers chased the problem down and forced Verizon to fix their shit. I've had DSL ever since.
I seem to recall our tax money going to these companies to pay for a fiber infrastructure. It's more like the landscaper you hired and paid for mowed the neighbor's lawn but not yours.
You guys are all over the Connect requests for this, and I want to strangle each and every one of you.
Yes, the code itself doesn't take up much memory. If that's all we were doing, we would never hit the 3GB ceiling. VS isn't just a text editor. When you start using designers (both MS's and third party), analyzers, code mapping, workflow, etc you'll find that you quickly run out of space. Products like DevExpress really chew through memory. It is very easy to hit the limit, and there are many, many developers complaining to MS about it.
Having to create and maintain only one build is better than two. It would also force software companies to develop for 64 bits. If MS dropped 32 bit support, maybe we'd finally get a 64 bit version of Visual Studio that doesn't drop dead when you hit over 3GB in use. Is Firefox even 64 bit on windows yet (the main version, not a dev branch)? There's no reason for most of us to have 32 bit support on our PCs anymore, and dropping it would convince some stragglers to finally release their software in 64 bit form.
Slashdot Mirror
But garbage collection and trace logging are part of software development which women apparently don't want to do?
Most of the people on this site are likely working in the tech industry or studying to work in the tech industry, if discrimination were a prevalent problem there would epic whining about it here.
Congrats, you have just defined government.
The summary mentions wireless a couple of times but it doesn't explicitly mention wired connections. That's probably what is meant by "broadband", but that's a somewhat non-specific term. You actually have to read the article.. but we all know that no one here does that.
Our leaders don't even obey the US Constitution, do you think they're going to let an international treaty get in their way?
Ads pay for television, yet I haven't seen any major disruption given the popularity of DVRs.
You're right, we need to involve the TSA. They can prevent Uber drivers from groping passengers.
Oh.. wait a minute.
There are assholes on both sides of the political spectrum, and many from both end up in court. It's not about what the assholes are up to. What matters is whether or not the law treats everyone fairly. Going to court sucks, but it's part of the process. A neighbor and I had to repeatedly contact law enforcement and code enforcement over something similar. The city threatened to take it to court, and that settled the matter. It'd be nice if it didn't go that far, but if someone thinks they're in the right, it can be difficult to persuade them otherwise.
An opposite of the equal treatment concept would be affirmative action. That is an example of laws that selectively benefit only certain groups of people, and it's not something that you can blame on "conservatives".
I think Comcast has prior art here. Such as the story the other day of a Comcast rep changing a customer's first name to "Asshole". The significance is that Comcast can get away with it. They're part of a monopoly or equally bad duopoly in many of the areas they serve. Uber is not. A company that denigrates its customers isn't going to be able to keep its customers, and that opens the door for another competitor to step in.
How are you defining an underrepresented group without using a quota?
You used an example that contradicts your own point. You're not very good at this.
So what if it took a court case? That's where grievances are heard. That's the whole point of having courts. What do you want to see happen? You want Judge Dredd to roll up and shoot the homeowner?
If he lost, then the law is treating both equally. Is it not?
To be gender blind one would not even count the number of students in the different demographics and would not be able to see that there are any underrepresented demographics. The problem is how to encourage underrepresented demographics to participate without discouraging over represented demographics from participating.
Why do all demographics have to be represented equally?
Wait a minute.. what kind of cruel state still defines our little darlings as being either boy or girl? That's clearly not the type of progressive thinking we should be pushing for. Do they still have separate but equal bathrooms? The horror! Frankly, CS enrollments are the least of the problems in such backward thinking divisive environments. Won't somebody please think of the children?
We have the best magic power rings.
It would send a message to Turks that their culture is fucked up.
Would it? I imagine they're used to not having the things that people in other countries have. I get what you're saying, but if social media leaves, they're left with dangerous options such as meeting in person. Makes it easy for the government to deal with them.
Look at what's happening in Russia. The anti-blogger laws went into effect. Have the people done anything to stop it?
Devil's advocate..
If they pull out of Turkey, what impact on free speech does that have? Do the people living there have any equivalent means of mass communication? Social media can help foster change, but if the major social media offerings all leave an area in protest, what does that leave the people?
The public doesn't generally hold politicians accountable for accepting these bribes, so therefore it is culturally acceptable.
You can quite easily disable updates in Steam per game. Are you saying they push updates even after you've disabled them?
Yea, it's the Galaxy Nexus that Google was selling. No 4.4.
I have a Google Nexus. 4.3 is the last version supporting my phone. The phone does everything I need it to, so I don't want to waste money on a newer one. I think this is a blatant attempt to force people to buy newer phones. All their craplets get updated, but not the Android OS.
That DSL competition is the only reason I have DSL. Verizon sent me a modem, it couldn't connect. They do very little troubleshooting before they decided to say that DSL wasn't available in my area. One of the other DSL providers chased the problem down and forced Verizon to fix their shit. I've had DSL ever since.
I seem to recall our tax money going to these companies to pay for a fiber infrastructure. It's more like the landscaper you hired and paid for mowed the neighbor's lawn but not yours.
You guys are all over the Connect requests for this, and I want to strangle each and every one of you.
Yes, the code itself doesn't take up much memory. If that's all we were doing, we would never hit the 3GB ceiling. VS isn't just a text editor. When you start using designers (both MS's and third party), analyzers, code mapping, workflow, etc you'll find that you quickly run out of space. Products like DevExpress really chew through memory. It is very easy to hit the limit, and there are many, many developers complaining to MS about it.
Having to create and maintain only one build is better than two. It would also force software companies to develop for 64 bits. If MS dropped 32 bit support, maybe we'd finally get a 64 bit version of Visual Studio that doesn't drop dead when you hit over 3GB in use. Is Firefox even 64 bit on windows yet (the main version, not a dev branch)? There's no reason for most of us to have 32 bit support on our PCs anymore, and dropping it would convince some stragglers to finally release their software in 64 bit form.
So let's get started on 128 bit systems..