Question, if the fine print(The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. Slashdot is not responsible for what they say) is not applicable as a contract between two parties, then how can a packaging licence(as used by M$) be applicable. Maybe i am confusing things, but this just came to mind
Slashdot Mirror
Question, if the fine print(The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. Slashdot is not responsible for what they say) is not applicable as a contract between two parties, then how can a packaging licence(as used by M$) be applicable. Maybe i am confusing things, but this just came to mind