If you're in the mood for some linx on how bad ms actually is, well here's some great ones: http://www.lies.com/dec97/121897.html http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-11/lw -11-vcontrol_3.html http://members.aol.com/machcu/msproducts.html http://www.ncworldmag.com/ncw-06-1998/ncw-06-lastt en.html http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2123 471,00.html And everybody's favorite: the one, the only, Microsoft Linux Myths Page! http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/Li nuxMyths.asp I can't believe ms actually tried to make this page of fake reasons on why nt is better (nt sucks).
I love it when M$ products have problems. It's one of the only ways the public can see how crappy their software is. Just compare the win95/98 crash rate with the linux crash rate. Win sometimes crashes 1-3 times a day, and linux has been known to run crashless for over a year. I can't wait till the day people will find that most of the competing products are ACTUALLY BETTER! Win2k Dataserver has very high specs, like the ability to handle up to 64G ram and 32 cpus. But if you think about it, which is better: a crash-prone closed source NT5 system with high specs and a budget-crushing price tag, or a crash-free open source linux system with lower specs and no price tag? Linux will eventally support even more stuff anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're in the mood for some linx on how bad ms actually is, well here's some great ones: http://www.lies.com/dec97/121897.html http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-11/lw -11-vcontrol_3.html http://members.aol.com/machcu/msproducts.html http://www.ncworldmag.com/ncw-06-1998/ncw-06-lastt en.html http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2123 471,00.html And everybody's favorite: the one, the only, Microsoft Linux Myths Page! http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/Li nuxMyths.asp I can't believe ms actually tried to make this page of fake reasons on why nt is better (nt sucks).
Just use netscape instead of ie - it's better
I love it when M$ products have problems. It's one of the only ways the public can see how crappy their software is. Just compare the win95/98 crash rate with the linux crash rate. Win sometimes crashes 1-3 times a day, and linux has been known to run crashless for over a year. I can't wait till the day people will find that most of the competing products are ACTUALLY BETTER! Win2k Dataserver has very high specs, like the ability to handle up to 64G ram and 32 cpus. But if you think about it, which is better: a crash-prone closed source NT5 system with high specs and a budget-crushing price tag, or a crash-free open source linux system with lower specs and no price tag? Linux will eventally support even more stuff anyway.