Yesterday I saw this in a newspaper here in Mexico and at first it sounded absurd to me, but I think/read that what happened it's that Starbucks used images taken/used by the INAH not ones that were taken for them, so the INAH wants Starbucks to pay for the use of the images, not because the images are aztec/teotihuacanas but because these particular images are owned by the INAH.
Slashdot Mirror
Yesterday I saw this in a newspaper here in Mexico and at first it sounded absurd to me, but I think/read that what happened it's that Starbucks used images taken/used by the INAH not ones that were taken for them, so the INAH wants Starbucks to pay for the use of the images, not because the images are aztec/teotihuacanas but because these particular images are owned by the INAH.