Not only is it completely uninforcable, linking has been a common, un-copyrightable practice since the dawn of, well, time. For example, you write a thesis on "Monkey Behaviour." So, you have a bibliography, saying where you did your research, etc. If the iCopyright.com thing is actually applicable to internet content, who says that it can't expand to print media? So, next time that dirt-poor college student writes his thesis, he has to drop a thousand dollars for his resources. Yeah? I don't think so.
Slashdot Mirror
Not only is it completely uninforcable, linking has been a common, un-copyrightable practice since the dawn of, well, time. For example, you write a thesis on "Monkey Behaviour." So, you have a bibliography, saying where you did your research, etc. If the iCopyright.com thing is actually applicable to internet content, who says that it can't expand to print media? So, next time that dirt-poor college student writes his thesis, he has to drop a thousand dollars for his resources. Yeah? I don't think so.